Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Centre for Public Safety, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208393. eCollection 2018.
As dog bite injuries are a considerable problem in modern society, in order to reduce such injuries, breed-specific legislation has been introduced in a number of countries. Whilst many studies have shown a lack of effect with such legislation, the commonly used methodology is known to be flawed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the Danish breed-specific legislation on the number of dog bite injuries using more credible methods. A time series intervention method was used on a detailed dataset from Odense University Hospital, Denmark, regarding dog bite injuries presented to the emergency department. The results indicate that banning certain breeds has a highly limited effect on the overall levels of dog bite injuries, and that an enforcement of the usage of muzzle and leash in public places for these breeds also has a limited effect. Despite using more credible and sound methods, this study supports previous studies showing that breed-specific legislation seems to have no effect on dog bite injuries. In order to minimise dog bite injuries in the future, it would seem that other interventions or non-breed-specific legislation should be considered as the primary option.
由于犬咬伤在现代社会是一个相当严重的问题,为了减少此类伤害,一些国家已经出台了针对特定品种的立法。尽管许多研究表明这种立法没有效果,但众所周知,常用的方法存在缺陷。因此,本研究旨在使用更可信的方法来调查丹麦针对特定品种的立法对犬咬伤数量的影响。本研究采用时间序列干预方法,对丹麦奥胡斯大学医院关于犬咬伤急诊就诊的详细数据集进行分析。结果表明,禁止某些品种对总体犬咬伤水平的影响非常有限,对这些品种在公共场所强制使用口罩和牵绳的影响也有限。尽管使用了更可信和合理的方法,但本研究支持了之前的研究结果,表明针对特定品种的立法似乎对犬咬伤没有影响。为了减少未来的犬咬伤,似乎应该考虑其他干预措施或非针对特定品种的立法作为主要选择。