Sanchez Alejandro Martin, Terribile Daniela, Franco Antonio, Martullo Annamaria, Orlandi Armando, Magno Stefano, Di Leone Alba, Moschella Francesca, Natale Maria, D'Archi Sabatino, Scardina Lorenzo, Mason Elena J, De Lauretis Flavia, Marazzi Fabio, Masetti Riccardo, Franceschini Gianluca
Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Istituto di Semeiotica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
J Pers Med. 2021 Mar 2;11(3):172. doi: 10.3390/jpm11030172.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant treatment (NACT) has been questioned by many studies that reported heterogeneous identification (IR) and false negative rates (FNR). As a result, some patients receive axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) regardless of response to NACT, leading to a potential overtreatment. To better assess reliability and clinical significance of SLNB status on ycN0 patients, we retrospectively analyzed oncological outcomes of 399 patients treated between January 2016 and December 2019 that were either cN0-ycN0 (219 patients) or cN1/2-ycN0 (180 patients). The Endpoints of our study were to assess, furthermore than IR: oncological outcomes as Overall Survival (OS); Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS); and Regional Disease Free Survival (RDFS) according to SLNB status. SLN identification rate was 96.8% (98.2% in patients cN0-ycN0 and 95.2% in patients cN+-ycN0). A median number of three lymph nodes were identified and removed. Among cN0-ycN0 patients, 149 (68%) were confirmed ypN0(sn), whereas regarding cN1/2-ycN0 cases 86 (47.8%) confirmed an effective downstaging to ypN0. Three year OS, DDFS and RDFS were significantly related to SLNB positivity. Our data seemed to confirm SLNB feasibility following NACT in ycN0 patients, furthermore reinforcing its predictive role in a short observation timing.
新辅助治疗(NACT)后的前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)受到了许多研究的质疑,这些研究报告了不同的识别率(IR)和假阴性率(FNR)。因此,一些患者无论对NACT的反应如何都接受腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND),这可能导致过度治疗。为了更好地评估SLNB状态对ycN0患者的可靠性和临床意义,我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2019年12月期间接受治疗的399例患者的肿瘤学结局,这些患者要么是cN0-ycN0(219例患者),要么是cN1/2-ycN0(180例患者)。我们研究的终点除了IR之外,还包括评估:根据SLNB状态的肿瘤学结局,如总生存期(OS);无远处疾病生存期(DDFS);以及区域无病生存期(RDFS)。SLN识别率为96.8%(cN0-ycN0患者中为98.2%,cN+-ycN0患者中为95.2%)。中位切除淋巴结数为3个。在cN0-ycN0患者中,149例(68%)被确认为ypN0(sn),而在cN1/2-ycN0病例中,86例(47.8%)被确认为有效降期至ypN0。三年OS、DDFS和RDFS与SLNB阳性显著相关。我们的数据似乎证实了NACT后ycN0患者进行SLNB的可行性,进一步加强了其在短观察期内的预测作用。