Tinterri Corrado, Barbieri Erika, Sagona Andrea, Di Maria Grimaldi Simone, Gentile Damiano
Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 15;16(18):3168. doi: 10.3390/cancers16183168.
This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%).
SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.
本研究比较了接受新辅助治疗(NAT)的临床淋巴结阳性(cN+)乳腺癌(BC)患者行腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)与前哨淋巴结活检术(SLNB)的长期疗效。
我们对322例接受NAT后临床淋巴结转阴(ycN0)的cN+ BC患者进行了回顾性分析。根据最终进行的腋窝手术类型对患者进行分类:ALND或SLNB。评估并比较两组患者的无复发生存期(RFS)、无远处疾病生存期(DDFS)、总生存期(OS)和乳腺癌特异性生存期(BCSS)。
与ALND组相比,SLNB组患者的3年、5年和10年RFS、DDFS、OS和BCSS均显著更好。SLNB组达到病理完全缓解(pCR)的患者比例也更高。多因素分析确定pCR、ypN0状态和SLNB是所有生存指标的有利预后因素。两组的腋窝复发率均较低(0.6-2.1%)。
对于NAT后转为ycN0的特定cN+ BC患者,SLNB可能是ALND的一种安全有效的替代方法。这些发现表明,仔细选择患者至关重要,需要进一步研究以在更具可比性的人群中验证这些结果。