Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centred Technologies, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
INAIL Prosthetic Center, 40054 Vigorso di Budrio, Italy.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 10;21(6):1953. doi: 10.3390/s21061953.
The evolution of technological and surgical techniques has made it possible to obtain an even more intuitive control of multiple joints using advanced prosthetic systems. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is considered to be an innovative and relevant surgical technique for improving the prosthetic control for people with different amputation levels of the limb. Indeed, TMR surgery makes it possible to obtain reinnervated areas that act as biological amplifiers of the motor control. On the technological side, a great deal of research has been conducted in order to evaluate various types of myoelectric prosthetic control strategies, whether direct control or pattern recognition-based control. In the literature, different control performance metrics, which have been evaluated on TMR subjects, have been introduced, but no accepted reference standard defines the better strategy for evaluating the prosthetic control. Indeed, the presence of several evaluation tests that are based on different metrics makes it difficult the definition of standard guidelines for comprehending the potentiality of the proposed control systems. Additionally, there is a lack of evidence about the comparison of different evaluation approaches or the presence of guidelines on the most suitable test to proceed for a TMR patients case study. Thus, this review aims at identifying these limitations by examining the several studies in the literature on TMR subjects, with different amputation levels, and proposing a standard method for evaluating the control performance metrics.
技术和手术技术的发展使得使用先进的假肢系统对多个关节进行更直观的控制成为可能。靶向肌肉神经再支配(TMR)被认为是一种创新且相关的手术技术,可改善不同截肢水平肢体的假肢控制。事实上,TMR 手术可以获得作为运动控制的生物放大器的神经再支配区域。在技术方面,已经进行了大量研究,以评估各种类型的肌电假肢控制策略,无论是直接控制还是基于模式识别的控制。在文献中,已经介绍了针对 TMR 受试者评估的不同控制性能指标,但没有公认的参考标准来定义评估假肢控制的更好策略。事实上,存在基于不同指标的多种评估测试,这使得理解拟议控制系统的潜力的标准指南的定义变得困难。此外,关于不同评估方法的比较或关于 TMR 患者病例研究最合适测试的指南的证据不足。因此,本综述旨在通过检查文献中针对不同截肢水平的 TMR 受试者的多项研究来确定这些限制,并提出一种评估控制性能指标的标准方法。