• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坡道仍是安全让轮椅使用者进出公交车的障碍。

Ramps remain a barrier to safe wheelchair user transit bus ingress/egress.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, J.B. Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Aug;15(6):629-636. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1604824. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.1080/17483107.2019.1604824
PMID:32364033
Abstract

Wheelchair users (WCUs) often rely on ramps for access to transit buses. Previous studies indicate WCUs have difficulty using ramps for bus ingress/egress and many transportation-related incidents occur on ramps. However, experiences of WCU ramp usage during ingress/egress have not been fully described. Cross-sectional, internet-based survey of WCUs who ride transit buses was conducted. The participants were queried on frequency of bus usage, difficulty and incidents involving ramps, and factors contributing to difficulty and incidents. Wheelchair characteristics, primary condition, and whether participants received travel training were also captured. Chi-square was used to describe relationships between wheelchair type and frequency of difficulties and incidents, and odd ratios were used to determine likelihood of the incidents. The majority (55.7%) of 384 participants reported using public transportation ≥ 1 per week. Seventy-eight percent of WCUs had ≥ 1 ramp incident over the past 3 years, with an increased likelihood of incidents occurring during ingress (OR = 1.53; CI 1.21-1.86). Of those who had an incident, 22% were injured or had damage to their wheelchair. Over 60% of those who had an incident identified steep ramp slope as being the contributing factor. Steep ramp slope, exterior ramp thresholds and wet surfaces were the most common contributing factors to difficulty using ramps. This is the first large-scale US study enabling WCUs to describe their experiences using transit bus ramps. Despite ADA guidelines, steep ramps remain the primary factor contributing to incidents and difficulty when using ramps to access transit buses.Implications for rehabilitationThe discrepancy between ADA maximum allowable ramp slopes for the built environment and transit buses may require an increased level of effort that is a barrier to transportation accessibility for some wheelchair users.Wheelchair users who access transit buses should be made aware of, and trained, to navigate ramp configurations found in the environment.We suggest rehabilitation therapists provide skills training specific to navigating transit bus ramp slopes that may be steeper and narrower than building ramps.

摘要

轮椅使用者(WCUs)通常依靠坡道进入过境巴士。先前的研究表明,WCUs 在使用坡道进出巴士时存在困难,并且许多与交通相关的事件都发生在坡道上。然而,WCU 在进出坡道时使用坡道的经验尚未得到充分描述。对乘坐过境巴士的 WCUs 进行了基于互联网的横断面调查。询问了参与者使用公共汽车的频率、使用坡道的困难和事故以及导致困难和事故的因素。还记录了轮椅的特点、主要情况以及参与者是否接受过旅行培训。使用卡方检验描述了轮椅类型与困难和事故频率之间的关系,使用比值比确定了事故发生的可能性。在 384 名参与者中,大多数(55.7%)每周至少使用一次公共交通工具。78%的 WCUs 在过去 3 年中至少发生过一次坡道事故,在进入时发生事故的可能性增加(OR = 1.53;CI 1.21-1.86)。在发生事故的人中,有 22%的人受伤或轮椅受损。超过 60%的发生事故的人认为坡道坡度是造成事故的原因。陡峭的坡道坡度、外部坡道门槛和湿表面是使用坡道时最常见的困难原因。这是美国首次进行的大规模研究,使 WCUs 能够描述他们使用过境巴士坡道的经验。尽管 ADA 指南规定,但陡峭的坡道仍然是导致使用坡道进入过境巴士时发生事故和困难的主要因素。对康复的影响ADA 为建筑环境规定的最大允许坡度与过境巴士之间的差异可能需要轮椅使用者增加一些额外的努力,这可能会成为他们获得交通便利的障碍。使用过境巴士的轮椅使用者应该了解并接受培训,以掌握在环境中找到的坡道配置。我们建议康复治疗师提供专门用于导航过境巴士坡道坡度的技能培训,这些坡度可能比建筑物的坡度更陡、更窄。

相似文献

1
Ramps remain a barrier to safe wheelchair user transit bus ingress/egress.坡道仍是安全让轮椅使用者进出公交车的障碍。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Aug;15(6):629-636. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1604824. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Manual wheelchair propulsion on ramp slopes encountered when boarding public transit buses.乘坐公共交通巴士时遇到的坡道上手动轮椅推进。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Aug;14(6):561-565. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1465602. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
Ramp-related incidents involving wheeled mobility device users during transit bus boarding/alighting.在公交上下车过程中,涉及轮式移动设备使用者的与坡道相关的事件。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):928-33. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.013. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Public transit bus ramp slopes measured in situ.现场测量的公共交通巴士坡道坡度。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016 Feb;11(2):133-138. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.913714. Epub 2014 May 2.
5
Self-reported difficulty and preferences of wheeled mobility device users for simulated low-floor bus boarding, interior circulation and disembarking.轮式移动设备使用者在模拟低地板公交车上车、车内通行和下车时自我报告的困难和偏好。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Feb;14(2):109-121. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1401128. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Appropriate protection for wheelchair riders on public transit buses.为乘坐公共交通巴士的轮椅使用者提供适当保护。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Jul-Aug;40(4):309-19. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.07.0309.
7
A systematic review of public transport accessibility for people using mobility devices.使用移动设备的人公共交通可达性的系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Aug;43(16):2253-2267. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1697382. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Retrospective review of adverse incidents involving passengers seated in wheeled mobility devices while traveling in large accessible transit vehicles.回顾性分析大型无障碍运输车辆中乘坐轮椅的乘客的不良事件。
Med Eng Phys. 2010 Apr;32(3):230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
9
Evaluating the Functionality and Usability of Two Novel Wheelchair Anti-Rollback Devices for Ramp Ascent in Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.评估两种新型轮椅防后滚装置对脊髓损伤手动轮椅使用者上坡时的功能性和可用性。
PM R. 2017 May;9(5):483-493. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Effects of transit bus interior configuration on performance of wheeled mobility users during simulated boarding and disembarking.在模拟上下车过程中,公交内部配置对轮式移动设备使用者性能的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jul;62:94-106. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
TRansit ACessibility Tool (TRACT): Developing a novel scoring system for public transportation system accessibility.公交可达性工具(TRACT):开发一种用于公共交通系统可达性的新型评分系统。
J Transp Health. 2024 Jan;34. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2023.101742. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
2
Barriers and facilitators of public transport use among people with disabilities: a scoping review.残疾人使用公共交通的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 8;4:1336514. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1336514. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluation of Power Wheelchair Dynamic Suspensions for Tip Prevention in Non-ADA Compliant Surfaces.
非 ADA 兼容表面中预防倾翻的动力轮椅动态悬架的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec;104(12):2043-2050. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.05.016. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Wheeled Mobility Use on Accessible Fixed-Route Transit: A Field Study in Environmental Docility.轮式助行器在无障碍固定路线交通中的使用:环境顺从性实地研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6):2840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062840.