School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, 70 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
School of Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, 70 Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;18(5):2486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052486.
Blue spaces have been found to have significant salutogenic effects. However, little is known about the mechanisms and pathways that link blue spaces and health. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarise the evidence and quantify the effect of blue spaces on four hypothesised mediating pathways: physical activity, restoration, social interaction and environmental factors. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted using six databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCOHOST/CINAHL). Fifty studies were included in our systematic review. The overall quality of the included articles, evaluated with the Qualsyst tool, was judged to be very good, as no mediating pathway had an average article quality lower than 70%. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for physical activity, restoration and social interaction. Living closer to blue space was associated with statistically significantly higher physical activity levels (Cohen's d = 0.122, 95% CI: 0.065, 0.179). Shorter distance to blue space was not associated with restoration (Cohen's d = 0.123, 95% CI: -0.037, 0.284) or social interaction (Cohen's d = -0.214, 95% CI: -0.55, 0.122). Larger amounts of blue space within a geographical area were significantly associated with higher physical activity levels (Cohen's d = 0.144, 95% CI: 0.024, 0.264) and higher levels of restoration (Cohen's d = 0.339, 95% CI: 0.072, 0.606). Being in more contact with blue space was significantly associated with higher levels of restoration (Cohen's d = 0.191, 95% CI: 0.084, 0.298). There is also evidence that blue spaces improve environmental factors, but more studies are necessary for meta-analyses to be conducted. Evidence is conflicting on the mediating effects of social interaction and further research is required on this hypothesised pathway. Blue spaces may offer part of a solution to public health concerns faced by growing global urban populations.
蓝色空间已被发现具有显著的促进健康的效果。然而,人们对将蓝色空间与健康联系起来的机制和途径知之甚少。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是总结证据,并量化蓝色空间对四个假设中介途径的影响:身体活动、恢复、社会互动和环境因素。根据 PRISMA 指南,使用六个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、PsycInfo、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、EBSCOHOST/CINAHL)进行了文献检索。我们的系统评价纳入了 50 项研究。使用 Qualsyst 工具评估纳入文章的总体质量,被评为非常好,因为没有中介途径的平均文章质量低于 70%。对身体活动、恢复和社会互动进行了随机效应荟萃分析。生活在靠近蓝色空间的地方与更高的身体活动水平呈统计学显著相关(Cohen's d = 0.122,95%CI:0.065,0.179)。与蓝色空间的距离较短与恢复无关(Cohen's d = 0.123,95%CI:-0.037,0.284)或社会互动(Cohen's d = -0.214,95%CI:-0.55,0.122)。地理区域内更多的蓝色空间与更高的身体活动水平(Cohen's d = 0.144,95%CI:0.024,0.264)和更高的恢复水平显著相关(Cohen's d = 0.339,95%CI:0.072,0.606)。与蓝色空间的更多接触与更高的恢复水平显著相关(Cohen's d = 0.191,95%CI:0.084,0.298)。还有证据表明,蓝色空间可以改善环境因素,但需要更多的研究来进行荟萃分析。社会互动的中介作用的证据相互矛盾,需要进一步研究这一假设途径。蓝色空间可能为解决全球不断增长的城市人口面临的公共健康问题提供了部分解决方案。