Cosgarea Raluca, Eick Sigrun, Batori-Andronescu Ionela, Jepsen Søren, Arweiler Nicole B, Rößler Ralf, Conrad Torsten, Ramseier Christoph A, Sculean Anton
Department for Periodontology, Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Bonn, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
Clinic for Periodontology and Peri-Implant Diseases, Philipps University Marburg, 35033 Marburg, Germany.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Mar 9;10(3):277. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10030277.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival instrumentation (SI) alone or combined with either local drug delivery (LDD) or photodynamic therapy (PDT) in persistent/recurrent pockets in patients enrolled in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). A total of 105 patients enrolled in SPT were randomly treated as follows: group A ( = 35): SI +PDT and 7 days later 2nd PDT; group B ( = 35): SI+LDD; group C ( = 35): SI (control). Prior intervention, at 3 and 6 months after therapy, probing pocket depths, clinical attachment level, number of treated sites with bleeding on probing (n BOP), full mouth plaque and bleeding scores (gingival bleeding index, %BOP) were recorded. At the same time points, 8 periodontopathogens were quantitatively determined. All three treatments resulted in statistically significant improvements ( < 0.05) of all clinical parameters without statistically significant intergroup differences ( > 0.05). Several bacterial species were reduced in both test groups, with statistically significantly higher reductions for LDD compared to PDT and the control group. In conclusion, the present data indicate that: (a) In periodontal patients enrolled in SPT, treatment of persistent/recurrent pockets with SI alone or combined with either PDT or LDD may lead to comparable clinical improvements and (b) the adjunctive use of LDD appears to provide better microbiological improvements for some periodontal pathogens than SI alone or combined with PDT.
本研究的目的是评估在接受支持性牙周治疗(SPT)的患者中,单纯龈下器械治疗(SI)或联合局部药物递送(LDD)或光动力疗法(PDT)对持续性/复发性牙周袋的临床和微生物学效果。共有105名接受SPT的患者被随机分为以下几组进行治疗:A组(n = 35):SI + PDT,7天后进行第二次PDT;B组(n = 35):SI + LDD;C组(n = 35):SI(对照组)。在干预前、治疗后3个月和6个月,记录探诊牙周袋深度、临床附着水平、探诊出血的治疗部位数量(n BOP)、全口菌斑和出血评分(牙龈出血指数,%BOP)。在相同时间点,对8种牙周病原体进行定量测定。所有三种治疗方法均使所有临床参数有统计学意义的改善(P < 0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两个试验组中几种细菌种类均减少,与PDT和对照组相比,LDD组细菌减少具有统计学意义的更高幅度。总之,目前的数据表明:(a)在接受SPT的牙周炎患者中,单纯使用SI或联合PDT或LDD治疗持续性/复发性牙周袋可能会带来相当的临床改善;(b)与单纯使用SI或联合PDT相比,辅助使用LDD似乎能为某些牙周病原体带来更好的微生物学改善。