Suppr超能文献

晚期系统性肥大细胞增多症的反应标准:在 KIT 抑制剂时代的演变。

Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors.

机构信息

Division of Hematology, School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute/Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-6555, USA.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 15;22(6):2983. doi: 10.3390/ijms22062983.

Abstract

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal hematologic neoplasm, driven, in almost all cases, by the activating D816V mutation that leads to the growth and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells. While patients with advanced forms of SM have a poor prognosis, the introduction of KIT inhibitors (e.g., midostaurin, and avapritinib) has changed their outlook. Because of the heterogenous nature of advanced SM (advSM), successive iterations of response criteria have tried to capture different dimensions of the disease, including measures of mast cell burden (percentage of bone marrow mast cells and serum tryptase level), and mast cell-related organ damage (referred to as C findings). Historically, response criteria have been anchored to reversion of one or more organ damage finding(s) as a minimal criterion for response. This is a central principle of the Valent criteria, Mayo criteria, and International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment and European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (IWG-MRT-ECNM) consensus criteria. Irrespective of the response criteria, an ever-present challenge is how to apply response criteria in patients with SM and an associated hematologic neoplasm, where the presence of both diseases complicates assignment of organ damage and adjudication of response. In the context of trials with the selective D816V inhibitor avapritinib, pure pathologic response (PPR) criteria, which rely solely on measures of mast cell burden and exclude consideration of organ damage findings, are being explored as more robust surrogate of overall survival. In addition, the finding that avapritinib can elicit complete molecular responses of D816V allele burden, establishes a new benchmark for advSM and motivates the inclusion of definitions for molecular response in future criteria. Herein, we also outline how the concept of PPR can inform a proposal for new response criteria which use a tiered evaluation of pathologic, molecular, and clinical responses.

摘要

系统性肥大细胞增生症(SM)是一种罕见的克隆性血液肿瘤,几乎所有病例均由激活的 D816V 突变驱动,导致肿瘤性肥大细胞的生长和积累。虽然晚期 SM 患者预后较差,但 KIT 抑制剂(如米哚妥林和 avapritinib)的引入改变了他们的前景。由于晚期 SM(advSM)的异质性,连续迭代的反应标准试图捕捉疾病的不同方面,包括肥大细胞负担(骨髓肥大细胞百分比和血清胰蛋白酶水平)和与肥大细胞相关的器官损伤(称为 C 发现)的测量。从历史上看,反应标准的锚定点是恢复一个或多个器官损伤发现作为反应的最小标准。这是 Valent 标准、Mayo 标准、国际工作组-骨髓增生性肿瘤研究和治疗以及欧洲肥大细胞疾病网络(IWG-MRT-ECNM)共识标准的核心原则。无论反应标准如何,一个始终存在的挑战是如何在 SM 和相关血液肿瘤患者中应用反应标准,其中两种疾病的存在使器官损伤的分配和反应的判断复杂化。在选择性 D816V 抑制剂 avapritinib 的试验背景下,仅依赖于肥大细胞负担测量且不考虑器官损伤发现的纯病理性反应(PPR)标准正在被探索作为总生存期的更可靠替代指标。此外,发现 avapritinib 可以引起 D816V 等位基因负担的完全分子反应,为 advSM 建立了新的基准,并促使在未来的标准中纳入分子反应的定义。在此,我们还概述了 PPR 概念如何为使用病理性、分子性和临床反应的分层评估的新反应标准的建议提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d37e/8001403/cdeeff83c556/ijms-22-02983-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验