• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于实验室结果预测的处置决策支持

Disposition Decision Support by Laboratory Based Outcome Prediction.

作者信息

Mueller Oliver S, Rentsch Katharina M, Nickel Christian H, Bingisser Roland

机构信息

Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 1;10(5):939. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050939.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10050939
PMID:33804332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7957752/
Abstract

Disposition is one of the main tasks in the emergency department. However, there is a lack of objective and reliable disposition criteria, and diagnosis-based risk prediction is not feasible at early time points. The aim was to derive a risk score (TRIAL) based on routinely collected baseline (TRIage level and Age) and Laboratory data-supporting disposition decisions by risk stratification based on mortality. We prospectively included consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department over 18 weeks. Data sets of routinely collected baseline (triage level and age) and laboratory data were used for multivariable logistic regression to develop the TRIAL risk score predicting mortality. Routine laboratory variables and disposition cut-offs were chosen beforehand by expert consensus. Risk stratification was based on low risk (<1%), intermediate risk (1-10%), and high risk (>10%) of in-hospital mortality. In total, 8687 data sets were analyzed. Variables identified to develop the TRIAL risk score were triage level (Emergency Severity Index), age, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, albumin, bilirubin, and leukocyte count. The area under the ROC curve for in-hospital mortality was 0.93. Stratification according to the TRIAL score showed that 67.5% of all patients were in the low-risk category. Mortality was 0.1% in low-risk, 3.5% in intermediate-risk, and 26.2% in high-risk patients. The TRIAL risk score based on routinely available baseline and laboratory data provides prognostic information for disposition decisions. TRIAL could be used to minimize admission in low-risk and to maximize observation in high-risk patients.

摘要

分流是急诊科的主要任务之一。然而,目前缺乏客观可靠的分流标准,且基于诊断的风险预测在早期时间点并不可行。本研究旨在基于常规收集的基线数据(分诊级别和年龄)以及实验室数据,通过基于死亡率的风险分层得出一个风险评分(TRIAL),以辅助分流决策。我们前瞻性纳入了连续18周以上在急诊科就诊的患者。将常规收集的基线数据(分诊级别和年龄)以及实验室数据用于多变量逻辑回归分析,以建立预测死亡率的TRIAL风险评分。常规实验室变量和分流临界值通过专家共识预先选定。风险分层基于院内死亡率的低风险(<1%)、中风险(1-10%)和高风险(>10%)。总共分析了8687个数据集。确定用于建立TRIAL风险评分的变量包括分诊级别(急诊严重程度指数)、年龄、乳酸脱氢酶、肌酐、白蛋白、胆红素和白细胞计数。预测院内死亡率的ROC曲线下面积为0.93。根据TRIAL评分进行分层显示,所有患者中有67.5%属于低风险类别。低风险患者的死亡率为0.1%,中风险患者为3.5%,高风险患者为26.2%。基于常规可得的基线和实验室数据的TRIAL风险评分为分流决策提供了预后信息。TRIAL可用于尽量减少低风险患者的住院人数,并最大限度地增加高风险患者的观察时间。

相似文献

1
Disposition Decision Support by Laboratory Based Outcome Prediction.基于实验室结果预测的处置决策支持
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 1;10(5):939. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050939.
2
The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to predict Emergency Department Disposition: A derivation and internal validation study using retrospective state-wide data from New South Wales, Australia.用于预测急诊科处置情况的悉尼分诊至入院风险工具(START):一项使用澳大利亚新南威尔士州全州范围回顾性数据的推导与内部验证研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0111-4.
3
Routine blood tests are associated with short term mortality and can improve emergency department triage: a cohort study of >12,000 patients.常规血液检查与短期死亡率相关,并能改善急诊科分诊:一项超过 12000 名患者的队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 28;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0458-x.
4
Soft tissue oxygen saturation to predict admission from the emergency department: A prospective observational study.预测急诊科入院情况的软组织氧饱和度:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1111-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
5
Stress markers predict mortality in patients with nonspecific complaints presenting to the emergency department and may be a useful risk stratification tool to support disposition planning.应激标志物可预测因非特异性症状就诊于急诊科的患者的死亡率,并且可能是一种有用的风险分层工具,以支持处置计划。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):670-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12172.
6
Availability of suPAR in emergency departments may improve risk stratification: a secondary analysis of the TRIAGE III trial.急诊部门中 suPAR 的可用性可能改善风险分层:TRIAGE III 试验的二次分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 11;27(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0621-7.
7
The modified south African triage scale system for mortality prediction in resource-constrained emergency surgical centers: a retrospective cohort study.资源受限的急诊外科中心用于死亡率预测的改良南非分诊量表系统:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2541-4.
8
The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START2) using machine learning techniques to support disposition decision-making.悉尼入院风险分类工具(START2)采用机器学习技术辅助处置决策。
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Jun;31(3):429-435. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13199. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
9
Prediction of emergency department patient disposition decision for proactive resource allocation for admission.预测急诊科患者处置决策,以便主动分配入院资源。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Sep;23(3):339-359. doi: 10.1007/s10729-019-09496-y. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study.REDS 评分:一种用于风险分层急诊科疑似脓毒症的新评分系统:一项推导和验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e030922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030922.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonspecific stress biomarkers for mortality prediction in older emergency department patients presenting with falls: a prospective multicenter observational study.老年急诊科跌倒患者死亡率预测的非特异性应激生物标志物:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;20(2):585-595. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03693-6. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
2
Clinical Acuity in the Emergency Department and Injury Severity Determine Hospital Admission of Older Patients with Low Energy Falls: Outcomes from a Prospective Feasibility Study.急诊科的临床敏锐度和损伤严重程度决定了低能量跌倒老年患者的住院情况:一项前瞻性可行性研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 27;12(9):3144. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093144.

本文引用的文献

1
Physicians' Disease Severity Ratings are Non-Inferior to the Emergency Severity Index.医生的疾病严重程度评级不劣于急诊严重程度指数。
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 11;9(3):762. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030762.
2
The last decade of symptom-oriented research in emergency medicine: triage, work-up, and disposition.过去十年以症状为导向的急诊医学研究:分诊、检查和处置。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Oct 27;149:w20141. doi: 10.4414/smw.2019.20141. eCollection 2019 Oct 7.
3
Is it possible to quickly identify acutely unwell patients who can be safely managed as outpatients? The need for a "Universal Safe to Discharge Score".
是否有可能快速识别出病情急性但可以安全门诊管理的患者?需要一个“通用安全出院评分”。
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Sep;67:e13-e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
4
Patients with acute stroke are less likely to be admitted directly to a stroke unit when hospital beds are scarce: A Swedish multicenter register study.当医院床位稀缺时,急性中风患者直接入住中风单元的可能性较小:一项瑞典多中心登记研究。
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Jun;2(2):178-186. doi: 10.1177/2396987317698328. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
5
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
6
Predicting hospital admission at the emergency department triage: A novel prediction model.预测急诊科分诊中的住院:一种新的预测模型。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1498-1504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Predicting in-hospital mortality and unanticipated admissions to the intensive care unit using routinely collected blood tests and vital signs: Development and validation of a multivariable model.利用常规采集的血液检测和生命体征预测院内死亡率和 ICU 非预期转入:多变量模型的建立和验证。
Resuscitation. 2018 Dec;133:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
8
Routine blood tests are associated with short term mortality and can improve emergency department triage: a cohort study of >12,000 patients.常规血液检查与短期死亡率相关,并能改善急诊科分诊:一项超过 12000 名患者的队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 28;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0458-x.
9
Derivation and validation of a universal vital assessment (UVA) score: a tool for predicting mortality in adult hospitalised patients in sub-Saharan Africa.通用生命评估(UVA)评分的推导与验证:一种预测撒哈拉以南非洲地区成年住院患者死亡率的工具。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jul 28;2(2):e000344. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000344. eCollection 2017.
10
Early death after discharge from emergency departments: analysis of national US insurance claims data.急诊科出院后的过早死亡:美国全国保险理赔数据分析
BMJ. 2017 Feb 1;356:j239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j239.