Suppr超能文献

稳定型冠状动脉疾病老年患者体重状况分类中体重指数与身体脂肪指数的不一致性

Discordance between Body-Mass Index and Body Adiposity Index in the Classification of Weight Status of Elderly Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

作者信息

Hudzik Bartosz, Nowak Justyna, Szkodzinski Janusz, Danikiewicz Aleksander, Korzonek-Szlacheta Ilona, Zubelewicz-Szkodzińska Barbara

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Metabolic Disease Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 41-900 Bytom, Poland.

Third Department of Cardiology, Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 1;10(5):943. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050943.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Body-mass index (BMI) is a popular method implemented to define weight status. However, describing obesity by BMI may result in inaccurate assessment of adiposity. The Body Adiposity Index (BAI) is intended to be a directly validated method of estimating body fat percentage. We set out to compare body weight status assessment by BMI and BAI in a cohort of elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

A total of 169 patients with stable CAD were enrolled in an out-patient cardiology clinic. The National Research Council (US) Committee on Diet and Health classification was used for individuals older than 65 years as underweight BMI < 24 kg/m, normal weight BMI 24-29 kg/m, overweight BMI 29-35 kg/m, and obesity BMI > 35 kg/m. In case of BAI, we used sex- and age-specific classification of weight status. In addition, body fat was estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BImpA).

RESULTS

Only 72 out of 169 patients (42.6%) had concordant classification of weight status by both BMI and BAI. The majority of the patients had their weight status either underestimated or overestimated. There were strong positive correlations between BMI and BImpA (FAT%) (R = 0.78 < 0.001); BAI and BImpA (FAT%) (R = 0.79 < 0.001); and BMI and BAI (R = 0.67 < 0.001). BMI tended to overestimate the rate of underweight, normal weight or overweight, meanwhile underestimating the rate of obesity. Third, BMI exhibited an average positive bias of 14.4% compared to the reference method (BImpA), whereas BAI exhibited an average negative bias of -8.3% compared to the reference method (BImpA). Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of discordance in assessing weight status by BMI and BAI: BImpA (FAT%) odds ratio (OR) 1.29, total body water (%) OR 1.61, fat mass index OR 2.62, and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score OR 1.25.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial rate of misclassification of weight status between BMI and BAI. These findings have significant implications for clinical practice as the boundary between health and disease in malnutrition is crucial to accurately define criteria for intervention. Perhaps BMI cut-offs for classifying weight status in the elderly should be revisited.

摘要

背景与目的

体重指数(BMI)是一种常用的定义体重状况的方法。然而,用BMI描述肥胖可能导致对肥胖程度的评估不准确。身体肥胖指数(BAI)旨在成为一种直接经过验证的估计体脂百分比的方法。我们着手比较BMI和BAI在一组稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)老年患者中对体重状况的评估。

方法

共有169例稳定型CAD患者在门诊心脏病诊所入组。对于65岁以上的个体,采用美国国家研究委员会饮食与健康委员会的分类,即BMI<24kg/m²为体重过轻,BMI 24 - 29kg/m²为正常体重,BMI 29 - 35kg/m²为超重,BMI>35kg/m²为肥胖。对于BAI,我们使用了根据性别和年龄划分的体重状况分类。此外,通过生物电阻抗分析(BImpA)估计身体脂肪。

结果

169例患者中只有72例(42.6%)通过BMI和BAI对体重状况的分类一致。大多数患者的体重状况被低估或高估。BMI与BImpA(FAT%)之间存在强正相关(R = 0.78,P<0.001);BAI与BImpA(FAT%)之间存在强正相关(R = 0.79,P<0.001);BMI与BAI之间存在强正相关(R = 0.67,P<0.001)。BMI往往高估体重过轻、正常体重或超重的比例,同时低估肥胖的比例。第三,与参考方法(BImpA)相比,BMI表现出14.4%的平均正偏差,而BAI与参考方法(BImpA)相比表现出-8.3%的平均负偏差。多因素逻辑回归确定了BMI和BAI评估体重状况不一致的独立预测因素:BImpA(FAT%)比值比(OR)为1.29,全身水(%)OR为1.61,脂肪量指数OR为2.62,以及控制营养状况(CONUT)评分OR为1.25。

结论

BMI和BAI之间体重状况的误分类率很高。这些发现对临床实践具有重要意义因为营养不良中健康与疾病的界限对于准确界定干预标准至关重要。或许应该重新审视老年人中用于分类体重状况的BMI临界值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12be/7957704/c2a45637369e/jcm-10-00943-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验