Tkaczyszyn Katarzyna, Kuchar Ernest, Augustynowicz Ewa, Szenborn Leszek
Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.
Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 20;9(3):290. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030290.
We investigated the impact of a single unstructured educational lecture about vaccinations on the vaccine confidence in volunteer participants.
We conducted a survey-based study during a series of open meetings related to pregnancy and parenting. Before and after the pediatrician's lecture related to vaccinations, listeners completed the visual analogue scales (VAS, 0-15 cm), evaluating (1) self-declared knowledge on vaccinations and (2) how they perceive the safety and efficacy of this preventive method.
In total, 484 women aged 30 ± 4 years participated in the lecture (pregnant = 68%; ≥1 children = 56%). Participants declared to have more comprehensive knowledge on preventive vaccinations and perceived vaccines to be safer and more useful (the role for the immunity) after vs. before the lecture (median VAS: 10.4 vs. 7.2, 10.8 vs. 8.7, and 11.0 vs. 10.4 cm, all < 0.001). Importantly, the prevalence of vaccine-related adverse events was also assessed as being higher after the lecture (median VAS: 9.9 vs. 8.0 cm, < 0.001). The increase in self-declared knowledge on vaccinations and perceived need for vaccinations (delta VAS-VAS after minus before the lecture, expressed as % of baseline) was lower among participants who rated the lecture less vs. more useful. Importantly, both participants who liked vs. did not like the lecture comparably rated vaccines safer after vs. before the lecture (delta VAS (median, interquartile range): 16% (0-39%) vs. 18% (2-42%), = 0.39).
An educational lecture on vaccinations positively impacts vaccine confidence in young adult women. Irrespective of the subjective rating of the lecture, all listeners perceived vaccinations to be safer after vs. before the speech.
我们调查了一场关于疫苗接种的非结构化教育讲座对志愿者参与者疫苗信心的影响。
我们在一系列与怀孕和育儿相关的公开会议期间进行了一项基于调查的研究。在儿科医生关于疫苗接种的讲座前后,听众完成视觉模拟量表(VAS,0 - 15厘米),评估(1)自我宣称的疫苗接种知识,以及(2)他们如何看待这种预防方法的安全性和有效性。
共有484名年龄在30±4岁的女性参加了讲座(怀孕者 = 68%;育有≥1名子女者 = 56%)。参与者宣称在讲座后比讲座前对预防性疫苗接种有更全面的了解,并且认为疫苗更安全、更有用(对免疫的作用)(VAS中位数:10.4对7.2、10.8对8.7、11.0对10.4厘米,均P < 0.001)。重要的是,讲座后对疫苗相关不良事件发生率的评估也更高(VAS中位数:9.9对8.0厘米,P < 0.001)。在认为讲座不太有用的参与者中,自我宣称的疫苗接种知识增加以及对疫苗接种感知需求的增加(VAS差值 - 讲座后VAS减去讲座前VAS,以基线的百分比表示)低于认为讲座更有用的参与者。重要的是,喜欢与不喜欢讲座的参与者在讲座后与讲座前相比,对疫苗安全性的评价相当(VAS差值(中位数,四分位间距):16%(0 - 39%)对18%(2 - 42%),P = 0.39)。
一场关于疫苗接种的教育讲座对年轻成年女性的疫苗信心有积极影响。无论对讲座的主观评价如何,所有听众在讲座后都认为疫苗比讲座前更安全。