Crawford Kylie L, Finnane Anna, Greer Ristan M, Phillips Clive J C, Bishop Emma L, Woldeyohannes Solomon M, Perkins Nigel R, Ahern Benjamin J
School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;11(4):928. doi: 10.3390/ani11040928.
Worldwide, musculoskeletal injuries remain a major problem for the Thoroughbred racing industry. There is a strong interest in developing training and management strategies to reduce the impact of musculoskeletal injuries, however, progress has been limited by studies reporting conflicting findings, and a limited understanding of the role of different training methods in preventing injury. There is little data on patterns of rest periods and exercise data and how these vary between trainers. This prospective study of two-year-old racehorses was conducted in Queensland, Australia and involved weekly personal structured interviews with 26 trainers over 56 weeks. Detailed daily exercise data for 535 horses providing 1258 training preparations and 7512 weeks at risk were collected. Trainers were categorised into three groups by the mean number of two-year-old horses that they had in work each week over the study duration: (1) Small stables with five or less, (2) Medium stables with 6 to 15 and (3) Large stables with greater than 15 horses in training. Differences between trainers with small, medium and large stable sizes were evaluated using linear regression, Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test if linear models were mis-specified or Chi-squared tests for categorical variables. Significant differences were observed between trainers, with horses from larger stables accumulating a greater high-speed exercise volume ( < 0.001), attaining training milestones more frequently ( = 0.01) and taking less time to reach their training milestones ( = 0.001). This study provides detailed data to which training practices from other locations can be compared. Presenting actual training data rather than trainers' estimation of a typical program provides a more accurate assessment of training practices. Understanding how training practices vary between regions improves comparability of studies investigating risk factors and is an important step towards reducing the impact of musculoskeletal injuries.
在全球范围内,肌肉骨骼损伤仍是纯血马赛马行业的一个主要问题。人们对制定训练和管理策略以减少肌肉骨骼损伤的影响有着浓厚兴趣,然而,由于研究结果相互矛盾,以及对不同训练方法在预防损伤中的作用了解有限,进展一直受限。关于休息期模式和运动数据以及这些数据在训练师之间如何变化的数据很少。这项针对两岁赛马的前瞻性研究在澳大利亚昆士兰州进行,涉及在56周内对26名训练师进行每周一次的个人结构化访谈。收集了535匹马的详细每日运动数据,提供了1258次训练准备和7512个风险周。在研究期间,根据训练师每周训练的两岁马的平均数量,将训练师分为三组:(1) 小型马厩,每周训练五匹或更少马匹;(2) 中型马厩,每周训练6至15匹马;(3) 大型马厩,每周训练超过15匹马。对于小型、中型和大型马厩规模的训练师之间的差异,使用线性回归、如果线性模型指定错误则使用Kruskal-Wallis总体秩相等检验或对分类变量使用卡方检验进行评估。在训练师之间观察到了显著差异,来自大型马厩的马匹积累了更大的高速运动量(<0.001),更频繁地达到训练里程碑(=0.01),并且达到训练里程碑所需的时间更短(=0.001)。这项研究提供了详细的数据,可供其他地区比较训练方法。呈现实际训练数据而非训练师对典型训练计划的估计,能更准确地评估训练方法。了解不同地区的训练方法差异,可提高调查风险因素研究的可比性,是减少肌肉骨骼损伤影响的重要一步。