Suppr超能文献

《法医昆虫学案例报告——全球视角》

The Forensic Entomology Case Report-A Global Perspective.

作者信息

Kotzé Zanthé, Aimar Sylvain, Amendt Jens, Anderson Gail S, Bourguignon Luc, Hall Martin J R, Tomberlin Jeffery K

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, 400 Bizzell St., College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Forensics Fauna and Flora Unit, Forensic Sciences Laboratory of the French Gendarmerie, 95000 Pontoise, France.

出版信息

Insects. 2021 Mar 25;12(4):283. doi: 10.3390/insects12040283.

Abstract

Forensic practitioners analyzing entomological evidence are faced with numerous challenges when presenting their findings to law practitioners, particularly in terms of terminology used to describe insect age, what this means for colonization time of remains, and the limitations to estimates made. Due to varying legal requirements in different countries, there is no standard format for the entomological case report prepared, nor any guidelines as to the sections that are required, optional or unnecessary in a case report. The authors herein propose sections that should be considered when drafting an entomological case report. The criteria under which entomological evidence is analyzed are discussed, as well as the limitations for each criterion. The concept of a global, standardized entomological case report is impossible to achieve due to national legislative differences, but the authors here propose a basic template which can be adapted and changed according to the needs of the practitioner. Furthermore, while the discussion is fairly detailed, capturing all differences between nations could not be accomplished, and those initiating casework for the first time are encouraged to engage other practicing forensic entomologists or professional associations within their own nation or region, to ensure a complete report is generated that meets lab or national requirements, prior to generating a finalized report.

摘要

法医昆虫学家在向法律从业者陈述其研究结果时面临诸多挑战,尤其是在描述昆虫年龄的术语、这对尸体殖民化时间意味着什么以及估计的局限性方面。由于不同国家的法律要求各异,所编写的昆虫学案件报告没有标准格式,对于案件报告中哪些部分是必需的、哪些是可选的或不必要的也没有任何指导方针。本文作者提出了在起草昆虫学案件报告时应考虑的部分内容。讨论了分析昆虫学证据的标准以及每个标准的局限性。由于国家立法差异,全球标准化的昆虫学案件报告的概念无法实现,但作者在此提出一个基本模板,可根据从业者的需求进行调整和修改。此外,虽然讨论相当详细,但无法涵盖所有国家之间的差异,鼓励首次开展案件工作的人员与本国或本地区的其他法医昆虫学从业者或专业协会合作,以确保在生成最终报告之前生成一份符合实验室或国家要求的完整报告。

相似文献

5
Forensic Entomology in Animal Cruelty Cases.动物虐待案件中的法医昆虫学
Vet Pathol. 2016 Sep;53(5):898-909. doi: 10.1177/0300985816651683. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
8
Application of DNA-based methods in forensic entomology.基于DNA的方法在法医昆虫学中的应用。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:103-20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091423.
9
10
Forensic Entomology in China and Its Challenges.中国的法医昆虫学及其挑战
Insects. 2021 Mar 8;12(3):230. doi: 10.3390/insects12030230.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Forensic entomology.法医昆虫学。
Forensic Sci Res. 2017 Dec 8;3(1):1. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2017.1403081. eCollection 2018.
8
Is PMI the Hypothesis or the Null Hypothesis?PMI是备择假设还是原假设?
J Med Entomol. 2017 Sep 1;54(5):1109-1115. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjx119.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验