• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测人类的快速诊断测试的现场性能:1990 - 2020年印度的系统评价和荟萃分析

Field Performances of Rapid Diagnostic Tests Detecting Human Species: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in India, 1990-2020.

作者信息

Kojom Foko Loick Pradel, Pande Veena, Singh Vineeta

机构信息

Cell Biology Laboratory and Malaria Parasite Bank, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi 110077, India.

Department of Biotechnology, Kumaun University, Bhimtal, Uttarakhand 263001, India.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;11(4):590. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040590.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11040590
PMID:33806066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8064471/
Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have become a mainstay of malaria diagnosis in endemic countries since their implementation in the 1990s. We conducted a 30-year systematic review and meta-analysis on malaria RDTs performance in India. Outcomes of interest were sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR), and diagnostic odd ratio (DOR). Among the 75 studies included, most of the studies were cross-sectional (65.3%), hospital-based (77.3%), and targeted febrile patients (90.6%). Nearly half of RDTs were designed for detecting only (47.5%) while the rest were for and (11.9%), and /Pan- except for (32.3%). When compared to light microscopy (gold standard), pooled estimates of performances were: Se = 97.0%, Sp = 96.0%, PLR = 22.4, NLR = 0.02 and DOR = 1080. In comparison to polymerase chain reaction, the RDTs showed Se = 89.0% and Sp = 99.0%. Performance outcomes (Se and Sp) were similar for RDT targeting only, but decreased for mixed and non-falciparum infections. Performances of malaria RDTs are still high India. However, there is a need for developing RDTs with regard to targeting minor malarial species, individuals carrying only mature gametocytes, and -deleted parasites.

摘要

自20世纪90年代投入使用以来,快速诊断检测(RDTs)已成为疟疾流行国家疟疾诊断的主要手段。我们对印度疟疾RDTs的性能进行了为期30年的系统评价和荟萃分析。感兴趣的结果指标为敏感性(Se)、特异性(Sp)、阳性/阴性似然比(PLR/NLR)和诊断比值比(DOR)。在纳入的75项研究中,大多数研究为横断面研究(65.3%)、基于医院的研究(77.3%),且针对发热患者(90.6%)。近一半的RDTs仅设计用于检测(47.5%),其余的用于检测 和 (11.9%),以及 /泛 (除 外,32.3%)。与光学显微镜检查(金标准)相比,性能的合并估计值为:Se = 97.0%,Sp = 96.0%,PLR = 22.4,NLR = 0.02,DOR = 1080。与聚合酶链反应相比,RDTs的Se = 89.0%,Sp = 99.0%。仅针对 的RDTs的性能结果(Se和Sp)相似,但针对混合感染和非恶性疟原虫感染的性能有所下降。印度疟疾RDTs的性能仍然很高。然而,有必要开发针对次要疟原虫种类、仅携带成熟配子体的个体以及 -缺失寄生虫的RDTs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/f9c03d3589a8/diagnostics-11-00590-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/3591842524a7/diagnostics-11-00590-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/3bc65a85a0cf/diagnostics-11-00590-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/73acd75ee483/diagnostics-11-00590-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/10b1c5d10e54/diagnostics-11-00590-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/e0c78a44732f/diagnostics-11-00590-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/c010acf0ec2d/diagnostics-11-00590-g006a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/f9c03d3589a8/diagnostics-11-00590-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/3591842524a7/diagnostics-11-00590-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/3bc65a85a0cf/diagnostics-11-00590-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/73acd75ee483/diagnostics-11-00590-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/10b1c5d10e54/diagnostics-11-00590-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/e0c78a44732f/diagnostics-11-00590-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/c010acf0ec2d/diagnostics-11-00590-g006a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc26/8064471/f9c03d3589a8/diagnostics-11-00590-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Field Performances of Rapid Diagnostic Tests Detecting Human Species: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in India, 1990-2020.检测人类的快速诊断测试的现场性能:1990 - 2020年印度的系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;11(4):590. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040590.
2
Diagnostic accuracy and limit of detection of ten malaria parasite lactate dehydrogenase-based rapid tests for and .10 种基于疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶的快速检测试剂用于 和 的诊断准确性和检测限。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Oct 17;12:1023219. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1023219. eCollection 2022.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Impact of Plasmodium falciparum gene deletions on malaria rapid diagnostic test performance.疟原虫基因缺失对疟疾快速诊断检测性能的影响。
Malar J. 2020 Nov 4;19(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03460-w.
5
Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria diagnosis in the Peruvian Amazon: impact of pfhrp2 gene deletions and cross-reactions.在秘鲁亚马逊地区进行疟疾诊断的快速诊断检测:pfhrp2 基因缺失和交叉反应的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043094. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
6
Detecting Plasmodium falciparum in community surveys: a comparison of Paracheck Pf® Test and ICT Malaria Pf® Cassette Test to polymerase chain reaction in Mutasa District, Zimbabwe.在社区调查中检测恶性疟原虫:在津巴布韦穆塔萨区,比较 ParaChek Pf ® 检测和 ICT 疟疾 Pf ® 试剂盒检测与聚合酶链反应。
Malar J. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03536-7.
7
Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of human infections with Plasmodium knowlesi.评估三种快速诊断检测方法在检测人类感染 knowlesi 疟原虫中的应用。
Malar J. 2014 Feb 18;13:60. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-60.
8
Comparison of rapid diagnostic test Plasmotec Malaria-3, microscopy, and quantitative real-time PCR for diagnoses of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections in Mimika Regency, Papua, Indonesia.印度尼西亚巴布亚省米米卡县快速诊断检测Plasmotec Malaria-3、显微镜检查和定量实时PCR用于诊断恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫感染的比较
Malar J. 2015 Mar 5;14:103. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0615-5.
9
Detection of Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) in a co-endemic area in Malaysia.在马来西亚一个疟疾共流行地区,采用环介导等温扩增技术(LAMP)检测诺氏疟原虫、恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫。
Malar J. 2017 Jan 13;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1676-9.
10
Field and laboratory comparative evaluation of rapid malaria diagnostic tests versus traditional and molecular techniques in India.现场和实验室比较评估快速疟疾诊断检测与传统和分子技术在印度。
Malar J. 2010 Jul 5;9:191. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-191.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Two Multiplexed qPCR Assays for Malaria Detection and Speciation: A Comparative Study With Nested PCR and Microscopy.两种用于疟疾检测和物种鉴定的多重定量聚合酶链反应检测方法的评估:与巢式聚合酶链反应和显微镜检查的比较研究
J Parasitol Res. 2025 Feb 25;2025:4950793. doi: 10.1155/japr/4950793. eCollection 2025.
2
New variant/ subspecies of in Northeastern India.印度东北部的新变种/亚种。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2025 Jan-Feb;81(1):118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.10.010. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Diagnostic role of Sysmex hematology analyzer in the detection of malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends of neglected species infection in humans over the past century in India.印度过去一个世纪人类被忽视物种感染的趋势。
One Health. 2020 Oct 28;11:100190. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100190. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Severity and mortality of severe Plasmodium ovale infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.严重卵形疟感染的严重程度和死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0235014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235014. eCollection 2020.
3
Glutamate dehydrogenase: a novel candidate to diagnose Plasmodium falciparum through rapid diagnostic test in blood specimen from fever patients.
Sysmex 血液分析仪在疟疾检测中的诊断作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0296766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296766. eCollection 2024.
4
Deletions of Histidine-Rich Protein 2/3 Genes in Natural Plasmodium falciparum Populations from Cameroon and India: Role of Asymptomatic and Submicroscopic Infections.来自喀麦隆和印度的自然疟原虫种群中组氨酸丰富蛋白 2/3 基因缺失:无症状和亚临床感染的作用。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Apr 30;110(6):1100-1109. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0896. Print 2024 Jun 5.
5
Malaria in pregnancy in India: a 50-year bird's eye.印度妊娠疟疾:50 年的鸟瞰。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 19;11:1150466. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1150466. eCollection 2023.
6
Diagnostic performance of NxTek Eliminate Malaria-Pf test for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum in school children with asymptomatic malaria.NxTek Eliminate Malaria-Pf 检测用于无症状疟疾病例检测的诊断性能,研究对象为在校儿童。
Malar J. 2023 Mar 29;22(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04529-y.
7
The potential of digital molecular diagnostics for infectious diseases in sub-Saharan Africa.数字分子诊断技术在撒哈拉以南非洲地区用于传染病诊断的潜力。
PLOS Digit Health. 2022 Jun 30;1(6):e0000064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000064. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Non-falciparum species and submicroscopic infections in three epidemiological malaria facets in Cameroon.喀麦隆三种流行疟疾方面中非疟原虫物种和亚微观感染。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07901-6.
9
Diagnostic accuracy and limit of detection of ten malaria parasite lactate dehydrogenase-based rapid tests for and .10 种基于疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶的快速检测试剂用于 和 的诊断准确性和检测限。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Oct 17;12:1023219. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1023219. eCollection 2022.
10
Field performance of Plasmodium falciparum lactate dehydrogenase rapid diagnostic tests during a large histidine-rich protein 2 deletion survey in Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚进行大规模高组氨酸蛋白 2 缺失调查期间,恶性疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶快速诊断检测的现场性能。
Malar J. 2022 Aug 15;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04257-9.
谷氨酸脱氢酶:通过快速诊断试验在发热患者的血液标本中诊断恶性疟原虫的新候选标志物。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62850-x.
4
Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum field isolates with deletions in histidine-rich protein 2 and 3 genes in context with sub-Saharan Africa and India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.恶性疟原虫野毒株中组氨酸丰富蛋白 2 和 3 基因缺失与撒哈拉以南非洲和印度地区的流行情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Malar J. 2020 Jan 28;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-3090-6.
5
HRP2: Transforming Malaria Diagnosis, but with Caveats.HRP2:改变疟疾诊断,但需注意。
Trends Parasitol. 2020 Feb;36(2):112-126. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.004. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
6
Deletions in the 2 gene: An emerging threat to the elimination of malaria in India.2基因缺失:对印度消除疟疾的新威胁。
J Vector Borne Dis. 2019 Jan-Mar;56(1):85-86. doi: 10.4103/0972-9062.257781.
7
High proportions of pfhrp2 gene deletion and performance of HRP2-based rapid diagnostic test in Plasmodium falciparum field isolates of Odisha.在奥里萨邦的恶性疟原虫野外分离株中,pfhrp2 基因缺失比例较高,且基于 HRP2 的快速诊断检测性能良好。
Malar J. 2018 Oct 29;17(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2502-3.
8
How long do rapid diagnostic tests remain positive after anti-malarial treatment?抗疟治疗后快速诊断检测的阳性结果能持续多久?
Malar J. 2018 Jun 8;17(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2371-9.
9
Malaria diagnosis by PCR revealed differential distribution of mono and mixed species infections by Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax in India.PCR 检测疟疾结果显示,在印度,恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫的单一和混合种感染存在差异分布。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 22;13(3):e0193046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193046. eCollection 2018.
10
A Systematic Review: Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium malariae, and Plasmodium ovale Monoinfections in Human Blood.一项系统评价:快速诊断检测在人体血液中检测单纯性 knowlesi 疟原虫、malariae 疟原虫和 ovale 疟原虫感染的性能。
J Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 20;218(2):265-276. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy150.