• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国大陆社会群体的温暖和能力刻板印象:来自一个大型本科生样本的证据。

Stereotypes of Social Groups in Mainland China in Terms of Warmth and Competence: Evidence from a Large Undergraduate Sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.

Department of Psychology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;18(7):3559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073559.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18073559
PMID:33808092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8037077/
Abstract

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) has been validated in multiple countries and regions. However, previous validation studies in China have been limited by small sample size. The current research increased the sample size (n = 184 in the pilot study; n = 1315 and n = 268 in the formal study) to validate the SCM in mainland China in study 1. Supporting the SCM, 41 social groups were clustered into four quadrants based on warmth and competence dimensions. 35 of the 41 target groups (85.37%) receive ambivalent stereotype. Perceived warmth and competence were positively correlated ( = 0.585, < 0.001). Status and competence were positively related ( = 0.81, < 0.001), and competition and warmth were negatively related ( = -0.77, < 0.001). In addition, 24 typical social groups were selected and a list of stereotype words for these groups was developed in study 2 (n = 48, n = 52). The implications of the emerging social groups and the applications of this stereotype word list are discussed.

摘要

刻板内容模型(SCM)已在多个国家和地区得到验证。然而,中国之前的验证研究受到样本量小的限制。本研究通过增加样本量(预研究中 n = 184;正式研究中 n = 1315 和 n = 268),在研究 1 中对中国大陆的 SCM 进行了验证。支持 SCM,根据温暖和能力维度将 41 个社会群体聚类到四个象限中。41 个目标群体中的 35 个(85.37%)受到矛盾的刻板印象。感知的温暖和能力呈正相关( = 0.585,<0.001)。地位和能力呈正相关( = 0.81,<0.001),竞争和温暖呈负相关( = -0.77,<0.001)。此外,在研究 2 中选择了 24 个典型的社会群体,并为这些群体开发了一份刻板印象词汇列表(n = 48,n = 52)。讨论了新兴社会群体的意义和这个刻板印象词汇列表的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e0/8037077/a52ce8f75da2/ijerph-18-03559-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e0/8037077/3b5816869c7c/ijerph-18-03559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e0/8037077/b8a9b74d3409/ijerph-18-03559-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e0/8037077/a52ce8f75da2/ijerph-18-03559-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e0/8037077/3b5816869c7c/ijerph-18-03559-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e0/8037077/b8a9b74d3409/ijerph-18-03559-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e0/8037077/a52ce8f75da2/ijerph-18-03559-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Stereotypes of Social Groups in Mainland China in Terms of Warmth and Competence: Evidence from a Large Undergraduate Sample.中国大陆社会群体的温暖和能力刻板印象:来自一个大型本科生样本的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;18(7):3559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073559.
2
Examining stereotypes in a dynamic social order: the stereotype content model in India.考察动态社会秩序中的刻板印象:印度的刻板印象内容模型。
J Soc Psychol. 2024 May 3;164(3):293-301. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2071670. Epub 2022 May 15.
3
Differences in Explicit Stereotype Activation among Social Groups Based on the Stereotype Content Model: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence in Chinese Sample.基于刻板印象内容模型的社会群体间明确刻板印象激活差异:中国样本中的行为和电生理证据
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):1001. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10121001.
4
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.一个(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源于感知到的地位和竞争。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902.
5
Stereotype content and morality: How competence and warmth arise from morally significant interactions.刻板印象内容与道德:有意义的道德互动如何产生能力与温暖。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct;57(4):834-854. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12262. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Stereotypes of Norwegian social groups.挪威社会群体的刻板印象。
Scand J Psychol. 2014 Oct;55(5):469-76. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12141. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
Mapping Ethnic Stereotypes and Their Antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model.描绘俄罗斯的种族刻板印象及其成因:刻板印象内容模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643. eCollection 2019.
8
Blame it on her 'baby brain'? Investigating the contents of social stereotypes about pregnant women's warmth and competence.把这归咎于她的“孕傻”?探究关于孕妇热情和能力的社会刻板印象的内容。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;62(2):692-707. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12587. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
9
Warmth and competence stereotypes about immigrant groups in Germany.德国对移民群体的温暖和能力刻板印象。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 27;14(9):e0223103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223103. eCollection 2019.
10
Influence of warmth and competence on the promotion of safe in-group selection: Stereotype content model and social categorization of faces.温暖与能力对促进安全的内群体选择的影响:刻板印象内容模型与面孔的社会分类
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(8):1464-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1084339. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Explicit Stereotype Activation among Social Groups Based on the Stereotype Content Model: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence in Chinese Sample.基于刻板印象内容模型的社会群体间明确刻板印象激活差异:中国样本中的行为和电生理证据
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):1001. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10121001.

本文引用的文献

1
Intergroup Relations During the Refugee Crisis: Individual and Cultural Stereotypes and Prejudices and Their Relationship With Behavior Toward Asylum Seekers.难民危机期间的群体间关系:个体与文化刻板印象及偏见及其与对待寻求庇护者行为的关系
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 18;11:612267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612267. eCollection 2020.
2
Differences in Explicit Stereotype Activation among Social Groups Based on the Stereotype Content Model: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence in Chinese Sample.基于刻板印象内容模型的社会群体间明确刻板印象激活差异:中国样本中的行为和电生理证据
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):1001. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10121001.
3
Anti-roma Bias (Stereotypes, Prejudice, Behavioral Tendencies): A Network Approach Toward Attitude Strength.
抗罗姆人偏见(刻板印象、偏见、行为倾向):一种关于态度强度的网络研究方法。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:2071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02071. eCollection 2020.
4
Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups.《社会世界的导航:评估自我、个体和群体的综合框架》
Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;128(2):290-314. doi: 10.1037/rev0000262. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
The Stereotype Content Model as an Explanation of Biased Perceptions in a Medical Interaction: Implications for Patient-Provider Relationship.作为医学互动中偏见认知解释的刻板印象内容模型:对医患关系的启示
Health Commun. 2022 Jan;37(1):64-73. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1816311. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
As diversity increases, people paradoxically perceive social groups as more similar.随着多样性的增加,人们反而会觉得社会群体之间更相似。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 9;117(23):12741-12749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000333117. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
Do Brand Competence and Warmth Always Influence Purchase Intention? The Moderating Role of Gender.品牌能力与亲和力总是会影响购买意愿吗?性别的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 21;11:248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00248. eCollection 2020.
8
Social perceptions of warmth and competence influence behavioral intentions and neural processing.社会对温暖和能力的感知会影响行为意图和神经处理。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Apr;20(2):265-275. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00767-3.
9
Vertical and horizontal inequality are status and power differences: applications to stereotyping by competence and warmth.垂直不平等和水平不平等是地位和权力的差异:应用于能力和热情刻板印象。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
10
Stereotypes as Historical Accidents: Images of Social Class in Postcommunist Versus Capitalist Societies.刻板印象作为历史偶然:后共产主义与资本主义社会中社会阶级的形象。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jun;46(6):927-943. doi: 10.1177/0146167219881434. Epub 2019 Oct 15.