Suppr超能文献

基于运动的肌肉发育计划及其在肩袖肌腱病功能恢复中的有效性:一项系统评价。

Exercise-Based Muscle Development Programmes and Their Effectiveness in the Functional Recovery of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Dominguez-Romero Juan G, Jiménez-Rejano José J, Ridao-Fernández Carmen, Chamorro-Moriana Gema

机构信息

Research Group "Area of Physiotherapy" CTS-305, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 16;11(3):529. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030529.

Abstract

(1) Background: Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy causes pain and functional limitation of the shoulder. Physical exercises are effective therapies but there is no consensus on which exercise programme is the most appropriate. Objective: To analyze and compare the effectiveness of different intervention modalities-based exclusively on physical exercise muscle-development programs to improve shoulder pain and function in RC tendinopathy. (2) Methods: Systematic review (PRISMA) through a search in PubMed, WOS, PEDro, Cinahl, Scopus and Dialnet. The PEDro Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias analyzed the methodological quality. A pre-established table collected data on: patients, interventions, outcome measures and results. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted. (3) Results: eight articles were selected (Cochrane: ; PEDro: good quality). All assessed programs were effective. Only one study found statistically and clinically significant differences in favour of eccentric training. The exercises used were: eccentric/concentric/conventional, open/closed kinetic chain, with/without co-activation of glenohumeral muscle, with/without pain, and in clinic/at home. (4) Conclusions: All exercise programs were effective in RC tendinopathy, improving pain and shoulder function. No solid results were obtained when the interventions were compared due to their heterogeneity. Patients perception assessment tools were the most widely used. Amount of load applied should be considered.

摘要

(1) 背景:肩袖(RC)肌腱病会导致肩部疼痛和功能受限。体育锻炼是有效的治疗方法,但对于哪种锻炼方案最合适尚无共识。目的:专门基于体育锻炼肌肉发育计划,分析和比较不同干预方式对改善RC肌腱病患者肩部疼痛和功能的有效性。(2) 方法:通过在PubMed、WOS、PEDro、Cinahl、Scopus和Dialnet中进行检索,进行系统评价(PRISMA)。使用PEDro量表和Cochrane偏倚风险评估方法学质量。一个预先设定的表格收集了关于患者、干预措施、结局指标和结果的数据。对结果进行叙述性综合分析。(3) 结果:筛选出8篇文章(Cochrane:;PEDro:质量良好)。所有评估的方案均有效。只有一项研究发现离心训练在统计学和临床上有显著差异。所使用的锻炼方式包括:离心/向心/常规、开链/闭链、有无盂肱肌协同激活、有无疼痛以及在诊所/在家中进行。(4) 结论:所有锻炼方案对RC肌腱病均有效,可改善疼痛和肩部功能。由于干预措施的异质性,在比较干预措施时未获得确凿结果。患者感知评估工具是使用最广泛的。应考虑施加的负荷量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb23/8002167/10975af6c4ec/diagnostics-11-00529-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验