National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, 64 Mills Road, Acton 2600, Australia.
Centre for Aboriginal Economic and Policy Research, The Australian National University, Acton 2600, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;18(6):3053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063053.
The centrality of culture to Indigenous peoples' health and wellbeing is becoming increasingly acknowledged in government policy. In Australia, the Indigenous Ranger program is a leading example of employment that supports increased cultural participation. In 2017, we demonstrated higher life satisfaction and family wellbeing among Indigenous Rangers compared to non-Rangers in Central Australia. Using an expanded national dataset, this present study aimed to: examine if associations between Ranger status and wellbeing continued to be observed in Central Australia; assess if these associations were observed among non-Central Australian Rangers; and, quantify the effect of mediating variables (Rangers status, cultural factors) on wellbeing outcomes. We analyzed Mayi Kuwayu baseline data ( = 9691 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) and compared participants who identified as past or currently employed Rangers compared to non-Rangers across two geographic locations (Central Australia, non-Central Australia). Ranger participation was significantly associated with very high life satisfaction and family wellbeing in Central Australia (high life satisfaction PR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.57, and family wellbeing (PR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36) and non-Central Australia (high life satisfaction PR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06-1.57), family wellbeing (PR 1.37, 95% CI 1.14-1.65). These findings concord with those observed in the 2017 proof-of-concept study. Additionally, we found that Ranger status partially mediated the relationships between existing cultural practices (first language as your Indigenous language and living on your country) and the two wellbeing outcomes. Current cultural practices, spending time on country and speaking your Aboriginal language, also partially mediated the associations between Ranger status and high life satisfaction, and between Ranger status and high family wellbeing. This analysis supports evidence that both Ranger employment and cultural participation are contributors to wellbeing. Ranger work is not only good for land, but it is good for people. As such, determining policies that mutually acknowledge and enhance culture, health and wellbeing will likely have additional benefits for the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population.
文化对原住民健康和福祉的核心作用在政府政策中越来越受到认可。在澳大利亚,原住民护林员计划是支持文化参与度提高的一个主要就业范例。2017 年,我们发现中澳地区的原住民护林员比非护林员的生活满意度和家庭幸福感更高。本研究使用扩展的国家数据集,旨在:检验护林员身份与幸福感之间的关联在中澳地区是否仍然存在;评估这些关联是否在非中澳地区的护林员中存在;并量化中介变量(护林员身份、文化因素)对幸福感结果的影响。我们分析了 Mayi Kuwayu 基线数据(=9691 名澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民),并将两个地理位置(中澳地区、非中澳地区)中自认为过去或目前受雇于护林员的参与者与非护林员进行了比较。在中澳地区,护林员的参与与非常高的生活满意度和家庭幸福感显著相关(高生活满意度 PR=1.31,95%CI 为 1.09-1.57,家庭幸福感 PR=1.17,95%CI 为 1.01-1.36),在非中澳地区,护林员的参与与高生活满意度(PR=1.29,95%CI 为 1.06-1.57)和家庭幸福感(PR=1.37,95%CI 为 1.14-1.65)显著相关。这些发现与 2017 年概念验证研究的结果一致。此外,我们发现,护林员身份部分中介了现有文化实践(你的第一语言是你的原住民语言,以及居住在你的国家)与这两个幸福感结果之间的关系。目前的文化实践,花时间在国家和说你的土著语言,也部分中介了护林员身份和高生活满意度之间的关联,以及护林员身份和高家庭幸福感之间的关联。这项分析支持了这样一种观点,即护林员的就业和文化参与都是幸福感的贡献因素。护林员的工作不仅对土地有益,对人民也有益。因此,确定相互承认和加强文化、健康和福祉的政策可能会给更广泛的澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民群体带来额外的好处。