• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知科学为何以及应如何关注美学?

Why and How Should Cognitive Science Care about Aesthetics?

机构信息

Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grueneburgweg 14, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grueneburgweg 14, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jun;25(6):437-449. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.008
PMID:33810983
Abstract

Empirical aesthetics has found its way into mainstream cognitive science. Until now, most research has focused either on identifying the internal processes that underlie a perceiver's aesthetic experience or on identifying the stimulus features that lead to a specific type of aesthetic experience. To progress, empirical aesthetics must integrate these approaches into a unified paradigm that encourages researchers to think in terms of temporal dynamics and interactions between: (i) the stimulus and the perceiver; (ii) different systems within the perceiver; and (iii) different layers of the stimulus. At this critical moment, empirical aesthetics must also clearly identify and define its key concepts, sketch out its agenda, and specify its approach to grow into a coherent and distinct discipline.

摘要

实证美学已经进入主流认知科学领域。到目前为止,大多数研究要么侧重于识别潜在审美体验的内在过程,要么侧重于识别产生特定类型审美体验的刺激特征。为了取得进展,实证美学必须将这些方法整合到一个统一的范例中,鼓励研究人员从时间动态和以下方面的相互作用角度进行思考:(i)刺激和感知者;(ii)感知者内部的不同系统;(iii)刺激的不同层次。在这个关键时刻,实证美学还必须明确识别和定义其关键概念,勾勒出其议程,并确定其发展成为一个连贯而独特学科的方法。

相似文献

1
Why and How Should Cognitive Science Care about Aesthetics?认知科学为何以及应如何关注美学?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jun;25(6):437-449. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
Neuroaesthetics: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience.神经美学:审美体验的认知神经科学。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;11(2):265-79. doi: 10.1177/1745691615621274.
3
A Farewell to Art: Aesthetics as a Topic in Psychology and Neuroscience.告别艺术:心理学和神经科学中的美学话题。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):630-642. doi: 10.1177/1745691619897963. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
4
Philosophical aesthetics and cognitive science.哲学美学与认知科学。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1445. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: the pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking.双过程视角下基于流畅性的美学:审美喜欢的兴趣-愉悦模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;19(4):395-410. doi: 10.1177/1088868315574978. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
6
Aesthetics and predictive processing: grounds and prospects of a fruitful encounter.美学与预测加工:富有成效的相遇的基础和前景。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220410. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0410. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
7
Order and change in art: towards an active inference account of aesthetic experience.艺术中的秩序与变化:走向审美体验的主动推理解释
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220411. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0411. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
8
Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?处理流畅性与审美愉悦:美存在于感知者的处理体验中吗?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.
9
Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology.工程美学与审美人机工程学:理论基础与双过程研究方法
Ergonomics. 2003;46(13-14):1273-92. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001610829.
10
Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics.十年的审美鉴赏与审美判断模型:审美事件——实证美学的发展与挑战
Br J Psychol. 2014 Nov;105(4):443-64. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12084.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiencing art together: integrating affect and semiosis.共同体验艺术:情感与符号系统的融合
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1544901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1544901. eCollection 2025.
2
Toward a neuroaesthetics of interactions: Insights from dance on the aesthetics of individual and interacting bodies.迈向互动的神经美学:舞蹈对个体身体与互动身体美学的启示
iScience. 2025 Apr 8;28(5):112365. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112365. eCollection 2025 May 16.
3
Gaze behavior when looking at paintings may predict autistic traits.观看画作时的注视行为可能预示着自闭症特征。
Psych J. 2025 Apr;14(2):267-276. doi: 10.1002/pchj.810. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
4
Appreciation of singing and speaking voices is highly idiosyncratic.对歌声和说话声的欣赏极具个性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Nov 6;11(11):241623. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241623. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Emotional palette: a computational mapping of aesthetic experiences evoked by visual art.情感调色板:通过视觉艺术唤起的审美体验的计算映射。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69686-9.
6
A Gaze into the Eyebrow Standards of Asian Versus Caucasian Women.亚洲女性与白种女性眉毛标准之审视
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Dec;48(23):4725-4734. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04240-6. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
7
On the connection between creativity and aesthetics.论创造力与美学之间的联系。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 30;15:1377485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1377485. eCollection 2024.
8
Binocularly suppressed stimuli induce brain activities related to aesthetic emotions.双眼抑制刺激会诱发与审美情绪相关的大脑活动。
Front Neurosci. 2024 May 24;18:1339479. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1339479. eCollection 2024.
9
Perceptual (but not acoustic) features predict singing voice preferences.感知(而非听觉)特征可预测歌唱声音偏好。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 18;14(1):8977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58924-9.
10
The unexplored territory of aesthetic needs and the development of the Aesthetic Needs Scale.审美需求的未知领域与审美需求量表的发展。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 18;19(3):e0299326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299326. eCollection 2024.