• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情促成的共同作者网络:国别案例分析

COVID-19 enabled co-authoring networks: a country-case analysis.

作者信息

Sachini E, Sioumalas-Christodoulou K, Chrysomallidis C, Siganos G, Bouras N, Karampekios N

机构信息

National Documentation Centre, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):5225-5244. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03952-9. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11192-021-03952-9
PMID:33814647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7996716/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In this paper we seek to examine the co-authoring pattern of a select group of researchers that are affiliated with a specific country. By way of making use of standard bibliometric analysis, we explore the publication evolution of all COVID-19-related peer reviewed papers that have been (co)-authored by researchers that are affiliated with Greek institutions. The aim is to identify its advancement over time, the institutions involved and the countries with which the co-authors are affiliated with. The timeframe of the study spans from the moment that WHO Director-General declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a public health emergency of international concern (WHO, 2020. Archived: WHO timeline-covid-19. Retrieved from Archived: Who Timeline-COVID-19. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19. Accessed on 10 May 2020., Archived: WHO timeline-covid-19), January 2020, to October 2020. Findings indicate that there is a steady increase in the number of publications as well as the number of scientific collaborations over time. At a cross-country level, results suggest that the affiliated institutional sectors such as the Higher Education Sector (HES) and the Government Sector (GOV) contributed the most in terms of scientific output. On an international scale, the evolution of the scientific collaboration is imprinted and distributed as a chain of affiliations that linked nations together. Such chains are represented as clusters of countries, in which the scientific connections between different countries can be visualised. It can be reasoned that a significant amount of publications (20%) is affiliated with countries having "traditionally" major scientific impact on the field of Medicine.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11192-021-03952-9.

摘要

未标注

在本文中,我们试图研究一组与特定国家相关联的研究人员的共同署名模式。通过使用标准文献计量分析方法,我们探索了所有由希腊机构的研究人员共同撰写的与新冠疫情相关的同行评审论文的发表演变情况。目的是确定其随时间的进展、涉及的机构以及共同作者所属的国家。研究的时间范围从世界卫生组织总干事宣布新型冠状病毒爆发为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件之时(世界卫生组织,2020年。存档:世界卫生组织新冠疫情时间线。取自存档:世界卫生组织新冠疫情时间线。https://www.who.int/news/item/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19。于2020年5月10日访问。,存档:世界卫生组织新冠疫情时间线),即2020年1月,至2020年10月。研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,出版物数量和科学合作数量都在稳步增加。在跨国层面上,结果表明,高等教育部门(HES)和政府部门(GOV)等附属机构部门在科学产出方面贡献最大。在国际范围内,科学合作的演变以一系列将各国联系在一起的附属关系链的形式呈现并分布。这些链条以国家集群的形式呈现,不同国家之间的科学联系可以可视化。可以推断,相当数量(20%)的出版物与在医学领域具有“传统”重大科学影响力的国家有关。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11192-021-03952-9获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/1ed44d628e38/11192_2021_3952_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/7c2ee3827238/11192_2021_3952_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/826043ef10a2/11192_2021_3952_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/bb9e77832e86/11192_2021_3952_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/ed4d08e9e58c/11192_2021_3952_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/e6775a061283/11192_2021_3952_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/1ed44d628e38/11192_2021_3952_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/7c2ee3827238/11192_2021_3952_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/826043ef10a2/11192_2021_3952_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/bb9e77832e86/11192_2021_3952_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/ed4d08e9e58c/11192_2021_3952_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/e6775a061283/11192_2021_3952_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7f8/7996716/1ed44d628e38/11192_2021_3952_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 enabled co-authoring networks: a country-case analysis.新冠疫情促成的共同作者网络:国别案例分析
Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):5225-5244. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03952-9. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Impact of the economic crisis on pain research: a bibliometric analysis of pain research publications from Ireland, Greece, and Portugal between 1997 and 2017.经济危机对疼痛研究的影响:1997年至2017年间爱尔兰、希腊和葡萄牙疼痛研究出版物的文献计量分析
Scand J Pain. 2018 Oct 25;18(4):629-637. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0092.
3
Coauthor Country Affiliations in International Collaborative Research Funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2009 to 2017.2009 年至 2017 年美国国立卫生研究院资助的国际合作研究中的共同作者国家隶属关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915989. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15989.
4
Evolution of Cooperation Patterns in Psoriasis Research: Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Papers in Medline (1942-2013).银屑病研究中合作模式的演变:Medline数据库(1942 - 2013年)论文的共同作者网络分析
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144837. eCollection 2015.
5
Research collaboration on community health worker programmes in low-income countries: an analysis of authorship teams and networks.低收入国家社区卫生工作者项目的研究合作:对作者团队和网络的分析。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1606570. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1606570.
6
Lessons for science and technology policy? Probing the Linkedin network of an RDI organisation.科技政策的经验教训?探究一个研发与创新组织的领英网络。
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(12):271. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00586-3. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
7
Publishing in pandemic times: A bibliometric analysis of early medical publications on Kawasaki-like disease (MIS-C, PIMS-TS) related to SARS-CoV-2.大流行时期的出版:与 SARS-CoV-2 相关的川崎病样疾病(MIS-C、PIMS-TS)早期医学出版物的文献计量分析。
Arch Pediatr. 2021 Aug;28(6):464-469. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 28.
8
A bibliometric analysis of the dental scientific literature on COVID-19.COVID-19 相关口腔科学文献的计量分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6171-6183. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03916-6. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
9
[Co-authorship and Spanish pediatric scientific collaboration networks (2006-2010)].[共同作者与西班牙儿科科学合作网络(2006 - 2010年)]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2013 Jun;78(6):410.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
10
Scientific collaboration of Cuban researchers working in Europe: understanding relations between origin and destination countries.在欧洲工作的古巴研究人员的科学合作:理解原籍国与目的地国之间的关系。
Scientometrics. 2018;117(2):745-769. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2888-2. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Türkiye's 3-Year Coronavirus Disease 2019 Publication Performance in the Shadow of the Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis.大流行阴影下土耳其2019年冠状病毒病的三年出版表现:一项文献计量分析
Thorac Res Pract. 2024 Aug 7;25(5):171-177. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2024.24020.
2
Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Research and the Changing International Collaboration Structure.新冠疫情研究的社会网络分析与不断变化的国际合作结构
J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci. 2022 Dec 26:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12204-022-2558-7.
3
Lessons for science and technology policy? Probing the Linkedin network of an RDI organisation.

本文引用的文献

1
Are all voices heard in the COVID-19 debate?在关于新冠疫情的辩论中,所有声音都被听到了吗?
Scientometrics. 2021;126(1):859-862. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03730-z. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
2
COVID-19 and Inequalities.新冠疫情与不平等现象
Fisc Stud. 2020 Jun;41(2):291-319. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12232. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders.新型冠状病毒肺炎学术信息模式的初步分析:呼吁在边境关闭时期开展开放科学。
科技政策的经验教训?探究一个研发与创新组织的领英网络。
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(12):271. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00586-3. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
4
Research on metallic glasses at the atomic scale: a systematic review.原子尺度下金属玻璃的研究:一项系统综述。
SN Appl Sci. 2022;4(10):281. doi: 10.1007/s42452-022-05170-1. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
5
Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?在恐慌与动力之间:新冠疫情第一波是否影响了地中海国家的科学出版?
Scientometrics. 2022;127(6):3083-3115. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04391-w. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
6
Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research.由危机和环境威胁驱动的研究领域的演变与结构:新冠疫情研究
Scientometrics. 2021;126(12):9405-9429. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04172-x. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
7
COVID-19 Pandemic Related Research in Africa: Bibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Output, Collaborations and Scientific Leadership.非洲与新冠疫情相关的研究:学术产出、合作与科学领导力的文献计量分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 7;18(14):7273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147273.
Scientometrics. 2020;124(3):2687-2701. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03587-2. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
4
How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns.科学研究如何应对国际突发公共卫生事件:对应对模式的全球分析
Scientometrics. 2020;124(1):747-773. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03531-4. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
5
Scientific globalism during a global crisis: research collaboration and open access publications on COVID-19.全球危机下的科学全球主义:关于新冠疫情的研究合作与开放获取出版物
High Educ (Dordr). 2021;81(5):949-966. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00589-0. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
6
Covidization of research: what are the risks?研究的新冠化:有哪些风险?
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1159. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1015-0.
7
Research funding after COVID-19.新冠疫情后的研究资金
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Aug;5(8):986. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0768-z.
8
COVID-19 prediction models should adhere to methodological and reporting standards.COVID-19 预测模型应遵循方法学和报告标准。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Sep 10;56(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02643-2020. Print 2020 Sep.
9
Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research.危机中的巩固:COVID-19 研究初期国际合作的模式。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 21;15(7):e0236307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236307. eCollection 2020.
10
Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge.疫情期间的出版带来了新的新冠疫情挑战。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):666-669. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0911-0.