• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析教师评定成绩、学生个性与标准化考试分数之间的关系。

Unraveling the Relationship Between Teacher-Assigned Grades, Student Personality, and Standardized Test Scores.

作者信息

Westphal Andrea, Vock Miriam, Kretschmann Julia

机构信息

Department of Education, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 19;12:627440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627440. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627440
PMID:33815213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8017135/
Abstract

The Big Five personality traits play a major role in student achievement. As such, there is consistent evidence that students that are more conscientious receive better teacher-assigned grades in secondary school. However, research often does not support the claim that students that are more conscientious similarly achieve higher scores in domain-specific standardized achievement tests. Based on the Invest-and-Accrue Model, we argue that conscientiousness explains to some extent why certain students receive better grades despite similar academic accomplishments (i.e., achieving similar scores in domain-specific standardized achievement tests). Therefore, the present study examines to what extent the relationship between student personality and teacher-assigned grades consists of direct as opposed to indirect associations (via subject-specific standardized test scores). We used a representative sample of 14,710 ninth-grade students to estimate these direct and indirect pathways in mathematics and German. Structural equation models showed that test scores explained between 8 and 11% of the variance in teacher-assigned grades in mathematics and German. The Big Five personality traits in students additionally explained between 8 and 10% of the variance in grades. Finally, the personality-grade relationship consisted of direct (0.02 | β| ≤ 0.27) and indirect associations via test scores (0.01 | β| ≤ 0.07). Conscientiousness explained discrepancies between teacher-assigned grades and students' scores in domain-specific standardized tests to a greater extent than any of the other Big Five personality traits. Our findings suggest that students that are more conscientious may invest more effort to accomplish classroom goals, but fall short of mastery.

摘要

大五人格特质在学生成绩中起着重要作用。因此,有一致的证据表明,在中学里,更有责任心的学生获得的教师评定成绩更好。然而,研究往往不支持这样的说法,即更有责任心的学生在特定领域的标准化成就测试中同样能取得更高的分数。基于投资与积累模型,我们认为责任心在一定程度上解释了为什么某些学生尽管学业成绩相似(即在特定领域的标准化成就测试中取得相似分数)却能获得更好的成绩。因此,本研究考察了学生个性与教师评定成绩之间的关系在多大程度上是直接关联而非间接关联(通过特定学科的标准化考试成绩)。我们使用了14710名九年级学生的代表性样本,来估计数学和德语学科中的这些直接和间接路径。结构方程模型表明,考试成绩解释了数学和德语学科中教师评定成绩差异的8%至11%。学生的大五人格特质还额外解释了成绩差异的8%至10%。最后,个性与成绩的关系包括直接关联(0.02≤|β|≤0.27)和通过考试成绩的间接关联(0.01≤|β|≤0.07)。责任心比其他任何一种大五人格特质都更能解释教师评定成绩与学生在特定领域标准化测试成绩之间的差异。我们的研究结果表明,更有责任心的学生可能会投入更多努力来实现课堂目标,但未能达到精通的程度。

相似文献

1
Unraveling the Relationship Between Teacher-Assigned Grades, Student Personality, and Standardized Test Scores.解析教师评定成绩、学生个性与标准化考试分数之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 19;12:627440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627440. eCollection 2021.
2
Are some students graded more appropriately than others? Student characteristics as moderators of the relationships between teacher-assigned grades and test scores in mathematics.是否有些学生的评分比其他学生更合适?学生特征作为教师评分与数学考试成绩之间关系的调节变量。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Sep;91(3):865-881. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12397. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Student-teacher relationship quality and academic adjustment in upper elementary school: the role of student personality.师生关系质量与小学生高学段学业适应:学生个性的作用
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Aug;51(4):517-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 May 29.
4
A reciprocal perspective on the differential associations between personality traits and multiple indicators of academic achievement.从互惠的角度探讨人格特质与多种学业成就指标之间的差异关联。
J Pers. 2024 Aug;92(4):1067-1085. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12871. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
5
Just as smart but not as successful: obese students obtain lower school grades but equivalent test scores to nonobese students.正如聪明但不成功一样:肥胖学生的学校成绩较低,但与非肥胖学生的考试成绩相当。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Jan;37(1):40-6. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.47. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
6
Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance: Differential associations across school subjects and school tracks.人格、认知能力与学业表现:不同学科和学校轨道的关联差异。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):249-265. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12482. Epub 2019 May 7.
7
Influence of Personality Traits and Learning Styles on Undergraduate Medical Students' Academic Achievement.人格特质与学习风格对本科医学生学业成绩的影响。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Jul 14;12:769-777. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S314644. eCollection 2021.
8
Personality-achievement associations in adolescence-examining associations across grade levels and learning environments.青少年的人格与成就的关联——考察不同年级和学习环境下的关联。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):356-372. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12495. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
9
Relationship among school socioeconomic status, teacher-student relationship, and middle school students' academic achievement in China: Using the multilevel mediation model.学校社会经济地位、师生关系与中国中学生学业成绩的关系:运用多层次中介模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0213783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213783. eCollection 2019.
10
What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers' cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality.是什么造就了一位好老师?数学教师的认知能力、个性、知识、信念以及对教学质量的动机的相对重要性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Dec;89(4):767-786. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12256. Epub 2018 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-S) in the Taiwanese context.台湾背景下学生版乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-S)的心理测量特性。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Oct 22:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03737-0.
2
Beyond Competencies: Associations between Personality and School Grades Are Largely Independent of Subject-Specific and General Cognitive Competencies.超越能力:人格与学业成绩之间的关联在很大程度上独立于特定学科和一般认知能力。
J Intell. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):26. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10020026.

本文引用的文献

1
Are some students graded more appropriately than others? Student characteristics as moderators of the relationships between teacher-assigned grades and test scores in mathematics.是否有些学生的评分比其他学生更合适?学生特征作为教师评分与数学考试成绩之间关系的调节变量。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Sep;91(3):865-881. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12397. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
A stable relationship between personality and academic performance from childhood through adolescence. An original study and replication in hundred-thousand-person samples.儿童期至青春期人格与学业成绩之间的稳定关系。在百万人样本中进行的原始研究和复制。
J Pers. 2020 Oct;88(5):925-939. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12538. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
Personality-achievement associations in adolescence-examining associations across grade levels and learning environments.
青少年的人格与成就的关联——考察不同年级和学习环境下的关联。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):356-372. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12495. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance: Differential associations across school subjects and school tracks.人格、认知能力与学业表现:不同学科和学校轨道的关联差异。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):249-265. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12482. Epub 2019 May 7.
5
What grades and achievement tests measure.成绩和学业水平测试所衡量的内容。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 22;113(47):13354-13359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601135113. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
The role of chronotype, gender, test anxiety, and conscientiousness in academic achievement of high school students.生物钟类型、性别、考试焦虑和尽责性在高中生学业成绩中的作用。
Chronobiol Int. 2016;33(1):1-9. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2015.1107084. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
Will Not Want: Self-Control Rather than Motivation Explains the Female Advantage in Report Card Grades.并非意愿:自我控制而非动机解释了女性在成绩单成绩上的优势。
Learn Individ Differ. 2015 Apr 1;39:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.006.
8
Random intercept EFA of personality scales.人格量表的随机截距探索性因素分析
J Res Pers. 2014 Dec;53:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001.
9
A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education.元分析:小学教育中成人评定的儿童个性与学业表现的关系
Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Jun;84(Pt 2):239-52. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12019. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
10
Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.探索性结构方程模型:探索性和验证性因子分析最佳特征的整合。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. Epub 2013 Dec 2.