Roemer Lena, Lechner Clemens M, Rammstedt Beatrice
GESIS-Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, P.O. Box 12 21 55, D-68072 Mannheim, Germany.
J Intell. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):26. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10020026.
The Big Five personality traits are established predictors of school grades. However, the mechanisms underlying these associations are not yet well understood. Effects of personality on grades might arise because behavioral tendencies facilitate learning and increase subject-specific competencies. Alternatively, personality effects on grades might be independent of cognitive competencies and reflect otherwise valued behaviors or teachers' grading practices. In the current study, we drew on large-scale data of 7th and 9th graders in Germany to explore the extent to which personality predicted grades even after accounting for competencies. Controlling for competencies and other key covariates, we cross-sectionally and longitudinally examined personality-grade associations across different school subjects, grade levels, and school types. Results indicate that the predictive power of personality is largely independent of subject-specific and general cognitive competencies. The largest effects emerged for conscientiousness. For openness, associations with grades partly overlapped with competencies, suggesting that openness may operate by fostering competencies. Overall, our results suggest that the associations between personality and grades unfold mostly independently of course mastery. This finding underlines the socioemotional value of personality in the classroom and encourages a more fine-grained view of the interplay between personality, competencies, classroom behavior, and grades.
大五人格特质是学业成绩的既定预测指标。然而,这些关联背后的机制尚未得到充分理解。人格对成绩的影响可能源于行为倾向促进学习并提高特定学科的能力。或者,人格对成绩的影响可能独立于认知能力,反映的是其他受重视的行为或教师的评分做法。在当前的研究中,我们利用了德国七年级和九年级学生的大规模数据,以探究在考虑能力因素后人格对成绩的预测程度。在控制了能力和其他关键协变量后,我们对不同学科、年级水平和学校类型的人格与成绩之间的关联进行了横断面和纵向研究。结果表明,人格的预测力在很大程度上独立于特定学科和一般认知能力。尽责性的影响最大。对于开放性,其与成绩的关联部分与能力重叠,这表明开放性可能通过培养能力来发挥作用。总体而言,我们的结果表明,人格与成绩之间的关联大多独立于课程掌握情况。这一发现凸显了人格在课堂中的社会情感价值,并鼓励对人格、能力、课堂行为和成绩之间的相互作用有更细致入微的看法。