Maru Duncan, Flynn Deirdre, Alsabahi Laila, Gallego Ana, Clippinger Emma, Friedman Rebecca, Kuldip Yogeeta, Myers Gavin, Oghenejobo Ese, Shah Amy, Tsao Tsu-Yu, Wojas Ewa, Yim Brian, Morse Michelle
Bureau of Equitable Health Systems, New York City Department of Health, New York 11101, United States.
Healthcare Payment Financing & Innovation, New York City Department of Health, New York 11101, United States.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 May 21;3(5):qxaf088. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf088. eCollection 2025 May.
Community members, elected officials, and policy makers are increasingly calling attention to the issue of inequities in hospital utilization and resource allocation within consolidated multi-hospital markets in the United States. Innovative policy solutions are required to re-shape the incentives driving hospital business practices and behaviors that produce inequitable outcomes and to ensure that equity, as well as economics, drives these business decisions. New measures can drive evidence-informed policy making and track the impact of new laws, regulations, and practices. In this paper, we illustrate the development and potential applications of the Proportional Share Index (PSI) using New York City (NYC) as a case study, highlighting its ability to quantify and track equitable access to hospitals across multi-hospital markets. The PSI incorporates both a measure of those who are covered by Medicaid or who are self-pay (largely uninsured) and hospital capacity in determining whether a given hospital is providing its proportionate, fair amount of care to these populations. We discuss how the PSI and related measures may inform policy interventions aimed at mitigating health inequities.
社区成员、民选官员和政策制定者越来越关注美国综合性多医院市场中医院利用和资源分配不平等的问题。需要创新的政策解决方案来重塑激励机制,这些激励机制推动了导致不公平结果的医院商业行为,并确保公平以及经济因素驱动这些商业决策。新措施可以推动基于证据的政策制定,并跟踪新法律以及法规和实践的影响。在本文中,我们以纽约市(NYC)为例,阐述比例份额指数(PSI)的发展及其潜在应用,突出其量化和跟踪多医院市场中公平就医机会的能力。PSI在确定某家医院是否为这些人群提供了与其比例相称的公平医疗服务时,纳入了医疗补助覆盖人群或自费人群(主要是未参保人群)的衡量指标以及医院的医疗能力。我们讨论了PSI及相关措施如何为旨在减轻健康不平等的政策干预提供参考。