Ali Danish, Zubair Muhammad, Kaiser Muhammad Adeel, Khokhar Imran, Afzal Muhammad Farooq
Department of Surgery Unit 1, Lahore General Hospital / Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore, Pakistan.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Feb;71(2(A)):414-416. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.05-673.
To evaluate the incidence of infection and patient satisfaction in terms of cosmesis between purse-string closure and the usual linear closure of stoma wound.
The experimental randomised clinical trial was conducted from December 2017 to December 2018 at the Surgical Unit 1, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised patients undergoing ileostomy stoma reversal. The patients were randomised into 2 groups using computer-generated random numbers. Group A underwent purse-string closure, while group B received linear closure. Both groups were followed post-operatively at 1 and 3 months for wound infection. Patient satisfaction was ascertained using standard tools. Data was analysed using SPSS version 20.
Of the 72 patients, there were 37(51.4%) in group A and 35(48.6%) in group B. Overall, there were 50(69.4%) males and 22(30.5%) females. Infection occurred in 2(5.4%) group A patients and in 8(22.8%) group B patients (p=0.023). Patients in group A were more satisfied at 3 months post-surgery than patients in group B (p=0.001).
Purse-string closure was found to be associated with a lower incidence of wound infection and higher patient satisfaction compared to linear closure.
评估荷包缝合法与造口伤口常规线性缝合法在感染发生率及美容方面的患者满意度。
2017年12月至2018年12月在巴基斯坦拉合尔拉合尔综合医院外科1病房进行了一项实验性随机临床试验,纳入行回肠造口还纳术的患者。使用计算机生成的随机数将患者随机分为2组。A组采用荷包缝合法,B组采用线性缝合法。两组术后1个月和3个月随访伤口感染情况。使用标准工具确定患者满意度。采用SPSS 20版软件进行数据分析。
72例患者中,A组37例(51.4%),B组35例(48.6%)。总体而言,男性50例(69.4%),女性22例(30.5%)。A组2例(5.4%)患者发生感染,B组8例(22.8%)患者发生感染(p = 0.023)。A组患者术后3个月的满意度高于B组患者(p = 0.001)。
与线性缝合法相比,发现荷包缝合法伤口感染发生率较低,患者满意度较高。