Suppr超能文献

荷包缝合与线性缝合在儿童造口还纳术后手术部位感染的比较。

A comparison of surgical site infections in children after stoma reversal between purse-string and linear closure.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Department of Surgery, Roi-Et Hospital, Roi-Et, 45000, Thailand.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Jan;38(1):149-156. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-05011-z. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To reduce the surgical site infections (SSI), the purse-string closure technique has been widely performed and has also been recommended in adult stoma reversal. However, for children, some debate still exists. This study aims to compare the SSI rates in children between the purse-string and the linear for the skin closure of stoma reversal.

METHODS

The data were collected from pediatric patients, who had undergone either purse-string or linear closure for elective surgery of stoma reversal from two university hospitals between January 2016 and December 2019.

RESULTS

The purse-string and linear closure had been performed on 31 and 45 patients, respectively. At 30 days after surgery, three patients in the purse-string closure group had developed SSI compared to 14 patients in the linear closure group (9.7 vs. 31.1%, p = 0.028). Furthermore, there had been no significant difference in the overall post-operative complications. In multivariate analysis, the SSI had been significantly lower in patients with purse-string closure (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.86, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

By employing the purse-string closure technique for skin closure of stoma reversal, there had been a significantly lower SSI rate compared to linear closure with no difference in the length of hospital stay.

摘要

背景

为了降低手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率,荷包缝合技术已被广泛应用,并被推荐用于成人肠造口还纳术。然而,对于儿童,仍存在一些争议。本研究旨在比较荷包缝合与线性缝合两种皮肤缝合方法在儿童肠造口还纳术中的 SSI 发生率。

方法

本研究的数据来自于 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在两所大学医院接受择期肠造口还纳术的患儿,这些患儿分别接受了荷包缝合或线性缝合。

结果

荷包缝合组和线性缝合组分别有 31 例和 45 例患者。术后 30 天,荷包缝合组有 3 例患者发生 SSI,而线性缝合组有 14 例患者发生 SSI(9.7%比 31.1%,p=0.028)。此外,两组患者的总体术后并发症无显著差异。多因素分析显示,荷包缝合组 SSI 的发生率显著低于线性缝合组(OR 0.21,95%CI 0.05-0.86,p=0.029)。

结论

与线性缝合相比,荷包缝合技术用于肠造口还纳术的皮肤缝合可显著降低 SSI 发生率,且住院时间无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验