Suppr超能文献

造口回纳术后手术部位感染:直线缝合与荷包缝合的比较

Surgical Site Infection After Stoma Reversal: A Comparison Between Linear and Purse-String Closure.

作者信息

Khan Muhammad Awais, Niaz Khurram, Asghar Shahzeb, Yusufi Maaz A, Nazir Mohtamam, Muhammad Ali Syed, Ahmed Aryan, Salahudeen Akeel Ahamed, Kareem Talha

机构信息

Accident and Emergency, Frimley Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Surrey, GBR.

General Surgery, Sheikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Dec 6;15(12):e50057. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50057. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intestinal stomas are utilized for both benign and malignant conditions of the intestine to mitigate the risk of anastomotic leakage and re-exploration. However, stomas are associated with various complications, such as stoma necrosis, peri-stomal irritation, parastomal hernia, bleeding, bowel obstruction, and electrolyte abnormalities. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a significant source of morbidity following stoma reversal, leading to increased patient morbidity. The conventional method of stoma reversal involves closing the skin with non-absorbable sutures in a linear fashion, which is known as linear skin closure (LSC). Recently, a new method of skin closure using purse-string approximation (PSA) has been advocated, which allows healing by secondary intention. The rationale for this study is to compare the SSI associated with LSC and PSA after stoma reversal.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the frequency of SSI between LSC and PSA in stoma reversal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Shifa International Hospitals Ltd. (SIH), Islamabad, Pakistan. The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial carried out between the 14 of March 2021 and the 22 of November 2022. The sampling technique was non-probability consecutive random sampling. The sample size was calculated using the WHO sample size calculator by using the hypothesis test for two population proportions. The minimum sample size in each group was 40 patients. The total sample size was 80 patients.

RESULTS

The overall frequency of SSI in all the patients was 18/80 (22.5%). The frequency of SSI in Group 1 (LSC) was 6/40 (15.0%), and in Group 2 (PSA), it was 12/40 (30.0%). The frequency of SSI in Group 2 (PSA) was twice as high as in Group 1 (LSC); however, the p-value was calculated to be 0.108. Therefore, this difference was statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

While PSA has exhibited promise in reducing SSI rates and enhancing aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction, there is still enough data favoring LSC. Moreover, insufficient data is available for our population to make a definitive statement. Consequently, further research on this topic is warranted, preferably involving larger sample sizes and multicenter randomized controlled trials, to establish which technique is superior in SSI reduction.

摘要

引言

肠造口用于肠道的良性和恶性疾病,以降低吻合口漏和再次手术探查的风险。然而,造口会引发各种并发症,如造口坏死、造口周围刺激、造口旁疝、出血、肠梗阻和电解质异常。手术部位感染(SSI)是造口回纳术后发病的一个重要原因,会增加患者的发病率。传统的造口回纳方法是用不可吸收缝线以线性方式缝合皮肤,即线性皮肤缝合(LSC)。最近,有人提倡一种使用荷包缝合(PSA)的新皮肤缝合方法,该方法允许二期愈合。本研究的目的是比较造口回纳术后LSC和PSA相关的SSI情况。

目的

本研究旨在比较造口回纳术中LSC和PSA的SSI发生率。

材料与方法

本研究在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡希法国际医院有限公司(SIH)普通外科进行。该研究是一项随机对照临床试验,于2021年3月14日至2022年11月22日进行。抽样技术为非概率连续随机抽样。样本量使用世界卫生组织样本量计算器,通过对两个总体比例的假设检验来计算。每组的最小样本量为40例患者。总样本量为80例患者。

结果

所有患者中SSI的总体发生率为18/80(22.5%)。第1组(LSC)的SSI发生率为6/40(15.0%),第2组(PSA)为12/40(30.0%)。第2组(PSA)的SSI发生率是第1组(LSC)的两倍;然而,计算得出的p值为0.108。因此,这种差异无统计学意义。

结论

虽然PSA在降低SSI发生率、改善美学效果和提高患者满意度方面显示出前景,但仍有足够的数据支持LSC。此外,我们人群中可用的数据不足,无法做出明确的结论。因此,有必要对该主题进行进一步研究,最好是进行更大样本量的多中心随机对照试验,以确定哪种技术在降低SSI方面更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验