Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Kotli, Azad Jamu Kashmir, Pakistan.
Environ Pollut. 2021 Jul 15;281:116950. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116950. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Disinfection is considered as a vital step to ensure the supply of clean and safe drinking water. Various approaches are adopted for this purpose; however, chlorination is highly preferred all over the world. This method is opted owing to its several advantages. However, it leads to the formation of certain by-products. These chlorination disinfection by-products (DBPs) are genotoxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic. Still chlorination is being practiced worldwide. Present review gives insights into the occurrence, toxicity and factors affecting the formation of regulated (THMs, HAAs) and emerging DBPs (N-DBPs, HKs, HAs and aromatic DBPs) found in drinking water. Furthermore, remediation techniques used to control DBPs have also been summarized here. Key findings are: (i) concentration of regulated DBPs surpassed the permissible limit in most of the regions, (ii) high chlorine dose, high NOM, more reaction time (up to 3 h) and high temperature (up to 30 °C) enhance the formation of THMs and HAAs, (iii) high pH favors the formation of THMs while low pH is suitable of the formation of HAAs, (iv) high NOM, low temperature, low chlorine dose and moderate pH favors the formation of unstable DBPs (N-DBPs, HKs and HAs), (v) DBPs are toxic not only for humans but for aquatic fauna as well, (vi) membrane technologies, enhanced coagulation and AOPs remove NOM, (vii) adsorption, air stripping and other physical and chemical methods are post-formation approaches (viii) step-wise chlorination is assumed to be an efficient method to reduce DBPs formation without any treatment. Toxicity data revealed that N-DBPs are found to be more toxic than C-DBPs and aromatic DBPs than aliphatic DBPs. In majority of the studies, merely THMs and HAAs have been studied and USEPA has regulated just these two groups. Future studies should focus on emerging DBPs and provide information regarding their regulation.
消毒被认为是确保供应清洁安全饮用水的重要步骤。为此采用了各种方法;然而,氯化在全世界都非常受欢迎。这种方法是由于其几个优点而被选择的。然而,它会导致某些副产物的形成。这些氯化消毒副产物(DBPs)具有遗传毒性、致癌性和致突变性。尽管如此,氯化仍在全世界范围内实施。本综述介绍了饮用水中发现的受管制(THMs、HAAs)和新兴 DBPs(N-DBPs、HKs、HAs 和芳香族 DBPs)的形成的发生、毒性和影响因素。此外,还总结了用于控制 DBPs 的修复技术。主要发现包括:(i)大多数地区的受管制 DBPs 浓度超过了允许的限度,(ii)高氯剂量、高 NOM、更长的反应时间(长达 3 小时)和更高的温度(高达 30°C)会增强 THMs 和 HAAs 的形成,(iii)高 pH 有利于 THMs 的形成,而低 pH 有利于 HAAs 的形成,(iv)高 NOM、低温、低氯剂量和适中的 pH 有利于不稳定 DBPs(N-DBPs、HKs 和 HAs)的形成,(v)DBPs不仅对人类有毒,对水生动物也有毒,(vi)膜技术、增强的混凝和 AOPs 去除 NOM,(vii)吸附、空气吹脱和其他物理化学方法是后形成方法,(viii)分阶段氯化被认为是一种有效降低 DBPs 形成的方法,而无需任何处理。毒性数据表明,N-DBPs 比 C-DBPs 更具毒性,芳香族 DBPs 比脂肪族 DBPs 更具毒性。在大多数研究中,仅仅研究了 THMs 和 HAAs,USEPA 只规定了这两组。未来的研究应侧重于新兴的 DBPs,并提供有关其监管的信息。