• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生对伪装的初步判断与审前法医精神病住院患者症状效度测量结果之间的关联。

The association between clinicians' initial judgments of feigning and outcomes on symptom validity measures among pretrial forensic psychiatric inpatients.

机构信息

Patton State Hospital, Patton, CA, USA.

Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Community and Public Safety Psychiatry Division, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;76:101698. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101698. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101698
PMID:33819780
Abstract

Research suggests the use of validated symptom validity tests to detect feigning is imperative to increase accuracy over unaided clinical judgment, especially in forensic settings. This study examined performance on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms (M-FAST) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) during 297 assessments of forensic inpatients. The risk of being identified as feigning on the M-FAST or SIRS was similar for those who were referred for evaluation of feigning compared to those who were not, but individuals with malingering designations prior to the evaluation scored significantly higher than those without on the M-FAST and several SIRS subscales. Findings support the importance of utilizing objective methods of data collection.

摘要

研究表明,使用经过验证的症状有效性测试来检测伪装对于提高准确性至关重要,尤其是在法医环境中。本研究在对 297 名法医住院患者的评估中,检查了 Miller 法医症状评估(M-FAST)和报告症状的结构化访谈(SIRS)的表现。与未被评估为伪装的人相比,那些因被怀疑为伪装而被评估的人在 M-FAST 和 SIRS 上被识别为伪装的风险相似,但在评估前被指定为装病的人在 M-FAST 和几个 SIRS 分量表上的得分明显高于没有被指定为装病的人。研究结果支持了使用客观数据收集方法的重要性。

相似文献

1
The association between clinicians' initial judgments of feigning and outcomes on symptom validity measures among pretrial forensic psychiatric inpatients.临床医生对伪装的初步判断与审前法医精神病住院患者症状效度测量结果之间的关联。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;76:101698. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101698. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
2
Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.在米勒症状法医评估测试筛查结果呈阳性的法医精神病住院患者中,获得结构化报告症状访谈(SIRS)及SIRS-2升高结果的可能性。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Dec;28(12):1586-1596. doi: 10.1037/pas0000289. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
The Relationship Between Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptom Feigning Among Forensic Inpatients Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.被判定无受审能力的法医住院患者中精神症状伪装与认知症状伪装之间的关系
Assessment. 2016 Dec;23(6):672-682. doi: 10.1177/1073191115599640. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
4
Differences between Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 sensitivity estimates among forensic inpatients: A criterion groups comparison.法医住院患者中报告症状结构化访谈(SIRS)与SIRS-2敏感性估计值之间的差异:标准组比较
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Oct;40(5):488-502. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000191. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
5
Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.重复法医评估中的诈病评估:SIRS 和其他装病测量中的患者变异性和可能的误诊。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(1):109-14.
6
Detection of malingering: psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the structured interview of reported symptoms-2.伪装检测:中文版报告症状的结构化访谈-2 的心理计量学评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 9;13:254. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-254.
7
Assessing feigning with the Feigning Evaluation INtegrating Sources (FEINS) in a forensic psychiatric sample.在法医精神病学样本中使用伪造评估综合来源(FEINS)来评估伪装。
Psychol Serv. 2022 May;19(2):213-224. doi: 10.1037/ser0000513. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting.在民事法医环境中筛查伪装。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Feb;30(2):133-40. doi: 10.1080/13803390701260363.
9
Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and Admissibility in Forensic Mental Health Assessment.报告症状结构化访谈第二版(SIRS-2):在法医精神健康评估中的应用与可采性
J Pers Assess. 2022 Mar-Apr;104(2):265-280. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.2006673. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
10
Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions.
Assessment. 2008 Mar;15(1):97-103. doi: 10.1177/1073191107308085.

引用本文的文献

1
Experts' Failure to Consider the Negative Predictive Power of Symptom Validity Tests.专家未能考虑症状效度测试的阴性预测能力。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 18;13:789762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.789762. eCollection 2022.