Suppr超能文献

出于良心拒服兵役、同流合污与一种并非温和的做法

Conscientious Objection, Complicity in Wrongdoing, and a Not-So-Moderate Approach.

作者信息

Minerva Francesca

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jan;26(1):109-119. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000682.

Abstract

This article analyzes the problem of complicity in wrongdoing in the case of healthcare practitioners (and in particular Roman Catholic ones) who refuse to perform abortions, but who are nonetheless required to facilitate abortions by informing their patients about this option and by referring them to a willing colleague. Although this solution is widely supported in the literature and is also widely represented in much legislation, the argument here is that it fails to both (1) safeguard the well-being of the patients, and (2) protect the moral integrity of healthcare practitioners. Finally, the article proposes a new solution to this problem that is based on a desirable ratio of conscientious objectors to non-conscientious objectors in a hospital or in a given geographic area.

摘要

本文分析了医疗从业者(尤其是罗马天主教徒)拒绝实施堕胎手术,但却被要求通过告知患者有堕胎这一选择并将患者转介给愿意实施手术的同事来协助堕胎的情况下的同谋 wrongdoing 问题。尽管这种解决方案在文献中得到广泛支持,并且在许多立法中也有广泛体现,但本文认为它未能同时做到:(1)保障患者的福祉;(2)保护医疗从业者的道德完整性。最后,本文提出了一个针对该问题的新解决方案,该方案基于医院或特定地理区域内出于良心拒服兵役者与非出于良心拒服兵役者的理想比例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验