• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压降低和降压治疗选择:SPRINT 试验的事后分析。

Blood pressure reduction and anti-hypertensive treatment choice: A post-hoc analysis of the SPRINT trial.

机构信息

Université de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique Inserm 1433, CHRU de Nancy Inserm U1116, FCRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.

Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2021 May;44(5):665-674. doi: 10.1002/clc.23591. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1002/clc.23591
PMID:33822396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8119807/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. In SPRINT an intensive versus standard BP lowering strategy resulted in a lower rate of cardiovascular events and death. Whether BP reduction only or also the choice of anti-hypertensive drugs is associated with outcomes remains to be elucidated.

AIMS

We aim to study the association of BP and different anti-hypertensive drugs with several cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS

Time-updated Cox and mixed-effects models. The primary outcome was a composite of first myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

A total of 9361 patients were included. The anti-hypertensive agents most frequently used were ACEi/ARBs, with an almost 20% higher prescription rate in the intensive arm (80% vs. 61%), followed by thiazide-type diuretics (65% vs. 42%), calcium-channel blockers (57% vs. 39%), and beta-blockers (52% vs. 26%). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were rarely used (≤7% of the observations). In multivariate analysis, the use of ACEi/ARBs, especially in combination with thiazides, were independently associated with a lower primary outcome event-rate (HR [95%CI] 0.75 [0.61-0.92], p = .006), whereas a DBP <60 mmHg was independently associated with a higher event-rate (HR [95%CI] 1.36 [1.07-1.71], p = .011). SBP <120 mmHg was associated with lower rate of cardiovascular and all-cause death on intensive treatment but not on the standard arm (interaction p < .05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In SPRINT, an intensive therapy strategy achieving SBP <120 mmHg with a DBP ≥60 mmHg, and using ACEi/ARBs plus thiazides was associated with a lower event-rate.

摘要

背景

未控制的血压(BP)会增加主要不良心血管事件的风险。在 SPRINT 中,强化降压策略与标准降压策略相比,降低了心血管事件和死亡的发生率。降低血压仅与抗高血压药物的选择有关,还是与结果有关,这一点仍有待阐明。

目的

我们旨在研究 BP 和不同抗高血压药物与多种心血管结局的关系。

方法

时间更新的 Cox 和混合效应模型。主要结局是首次心肌梗死、急性冠脉综合征、卒中和心力衰竭或心血管死亡的复合结局。

结果

共纳入 9361 例患者。最常用的抗高血压药物是 ACEi/ARB,强化组的处方率几乎高出 20%(80% vs. 61%),其次是噻嗪类利尿剂(65% vs. 42%)、钙通道阻滞剂(57% vs. 39%)和β受体阻滞剂(52% vs. 26%)。很少使用盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(≤7%的观察结果)。在多变量分析中,ACEi/ARB 的使用,尤其是与噻嗪类药物联合使用,与较低的主要结局事件发生率独立相关(HR [95%CI] 0.75 [0.61-0.92],p =.006),而 DBP <60mmHg 与更高的事件发生率独立相关(HR [95%CI] 1.36 [1.07-1.71],p =.011)。在强化治疗中,SBP <120mmHg 与较低的心血管和全因死亡率相关,但在标准治疗组中没有(两者的交互作用 p <.05)。

结论

在 SPRINT 中,采用 SBP <120mmHg、DBP ≥60mmHg 的强化治疗策略,并使用 ACEi/ARB 加噻嗪类药物,可降低事件发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e010/8119807/182924b01447/CLC-44-665-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e010/8119807/adbe9bd176c4/CLC-44-665-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e010/8119807/182924b01447/CLC-44-665-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e010/8119807/adbe9bd176c4/CLC-44-665-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e010/8119807/182924b01447/CLC-44-665-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Blood pressure reduction and anti-hypertensive treatment choice: A post-hoc analysis of the SPRINT trial.血压降低和降压治疗选择:SPRINT 试验的事后分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 May;44(5):665-674. doi: 10.1002/clc.23591. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension.一线利尿剂与其他类别降压药治疗高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 13;7(7):CD008161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008161.pub3.
3
Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients.肾移植受者的降压治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 31;7(7):CD003598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003598.pub3.
4
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub3.
5
Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 4. Effects of various classes of antihypertensive drugs--overview and meta-analyses.血压降低对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:4. 各类抗高血压药物的作用——综述与荟萃分析。
J Hypertens. 2015 Feb;33(2):195-211. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000447.
6
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2.
7
First-line drugs for hypertension.高血压一线用药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD001841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub3.
8
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.
9
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-blockers as second-line therapy for primary hypertension.β受体阻滞剂作为原发性高血压二线治疗的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD007185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007185.pub2.
10
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Systolic Blood Pressure Time in Target Range With Cardiovascular Events Among PRECISION Participants.血压处于目标范围内的收缩压时间与PRECISION研究参与者心血管事件的关联
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Jul;27(7):e70009. doi: 10.1111/jch.70009.
2
The impact of blood pressure lowering agents on the risk of worsening frailty among patients with diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.降压药物对糖尿病患者衰弱加重风险的影响:一项队列研究
NPJ Aging. 2024 Oct 7;10(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00173-1.
3
Antihypertensive medication classes and risk of incident dementia in primary care patients: a longitudinal cohort study in the Netherlands.

本文引用的文献

1
Myocardial reperfusion reverses the J-curve association of cardiovascular risk and diastolic blood pressure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure after myocardial infarction: insights from the EPHESUS trial.心肌再灌注可逆转心肌梗死后左心室功能不全和心力衰竭患者心血管风险与舒张压之间的J曲线关联:来自EPHESUS试验的见解。
Eur Heart J. 2020 May 1;41(17):1673-1683. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa132.
2
Progression of Arterial Stiffness is Associated With Midlife Diastolic Blood Pressure and Transition to Late-Life Hypertensive Phenotypes.动脉僵硬度的进展与中年舒张期血压和向老年高血压表型的转变有关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e014547. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014547. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
3
抗高血压药物类别与基层医疗患者新发痴呆症风险:荷兰的一项纵向队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 May 15;42:100927. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100927. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Used in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.用于收缩压干预试验的抗高血压药物治疗方案。
Hypertension. 2023 Mar;80(3):590-597. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20373. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
5
2022 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology and the Taiwan Hypertension Society for the Management of Hypertension.台湾心脏病学会与台湾高血压学会2022年高血压管理指南
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2022 May;38(3):225-325. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202205_38(3).20220321A.
Redefining diuretics use in hypertension: why select a thiazide-like diuretic?
重新定义高血压治疗中的利尿剂使用:为何选择噻嗪样利尿剂?
J Hypertens. 2019 Aug;37(8):1574-1586. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002088.
4
Potential spironolactone effects on collagen metabolism biomarkers in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure.潜在的螺内酯对血压控制不佳患者胶原代谢生物标志物的影响。
Heart. 2019 Feb;105(4):307-314. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313182. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
5
Association between mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the follow-up and cardiovascular events in acute myocardial infarction patients with systolic dysfunction and/or heart failure: an analysis from the High-Risk Myocardial Infarction Database Initiative.在伴有收缩功能障碍和/或心力衰竭的急性心肌梗死患者中,整个随访期间的平均收缩压和舒张压与心血管事件之间的关系:来自高危心肌梗死数据库倡议的分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;20(2):323-331. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1131. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
6
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
7
Individualizing treatment choices in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial.在收缩压干预试验中个体化治疗选择。
J Hypertens. 2018 Feb;36(2):428-435. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001535.
8
Systolic Blood Pressure Trajectory, Frailty, and All-Cause Mortality >80 Years of Age: Cohort Study Using Electronic Health Records.收缩压轨迹、衰弱与80岁以上人群的全因死亡率:使用电子健康记录的队列研究
Circulation. 2017 Jun 13;135(24):2357-2368. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026687. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Diastolic Blood Pressure, Subclinical Myocardial Damage, and Cardiac Events: Implications for Blood Pressure Control.舒张压、亚临床心肌损伤与心脏事件:对血压控制的启示
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 18;68(16):1713-1722. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.754. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.