Mersha Amanual Getnet, Bovill Michelle, Eftekhari Parivash, Erku Daniel Asfaw, Gould Gillian S
School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Nov;40(7):1294-1307. doi: 10.1111/dar.13290. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
With the advancement and rapid increase in the public's interest in utilisation of Internet and mobile phones, technology-based interventions are being implemented across a range of health conditions to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this review was to summarise findings from systematic reviews that evaluated the effectiveness of technology-based smoking cessation interventions and to critically appraise their methodological qualities.
An umbrella review was conducted using studies identified from a comprehensive literature search of six databases and grey literature. All included systematic reviews were checked for eligibility criteria and quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool. The level of evidence for each intervention category was assessed, citation matrices were generated and corrected covered area was calculated.
Five systematic reviews with a total of 212 randomised controlled trials and 237 760 participants were included. Fourteen intervention approaches were identified and classified into three categories: stand-alone web-based; stand-alone mobile phone-based and multicomponent interventions. Incorporating web and/or mobile-based interventions with face-to-face approach improved the rate of smoking cessation. However, there was no consistent evidence regarding the effectiveness of stand-alone Internet or mobile-based interventions.
Policymakers are recommended to develop strategies that enable health professionals to integrate these approaches with face-to-face smoking cessation support. Health professionals are recommended to be trained and equipped for online and mobile-based interventions.
Adding technology-based intervention to face-to-face smoking cessation support improves smoking cessation. Further research is needed to evaluate stand-alone web-based and mobile phone-based interventions.
随着互联网和手机使用的普及以及公众兴趣的迅速增长,基于技术的干预措施正在应用于一系列健康状况以改善患者预后。本综述的目的是总结系统评价的结果,这些系统评价评估了基于技术的戒烟干预措施的有效性,并严格评估其方法学质量。
采用对六个数据库和灰色文献进行全面文献检索所确定的研究进行一项伞状综述。使用多重系统评价评估工具对所有纳入的系统评价进行纳入标准和质量检查。评估每个干预类别的证据水平,生成引文矩阵并计算校正覆盖面积。
纳入了五项系统评价,共212项随机对照试验和237760名参与者。确定了14种干预方法并分为三类:独立的基于网络的;独立的基于手机的和多成分干预措施。将基于网络和/或手机的干预措施与面对面方法相结合可提高戒烟率。然而,关于独立的基于互联网或手机的干预措施的有效性,没有一致的证据。
建议政策制定者制定策略,使卫生专业人员能够将这些方法与面对面的戒烟支持相结合。建议对卫生专业人员进行基于在线和手机的干预措施的培训并提供相关设备。
在面对面戒烟支持中增加基于技术的干预措施可提高戒烟效果。需要进一步研究以评估独立的基于网络和手机的干预措施。