• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结清扫术对临床早期卵巢癌患者生存的影响。

The impact of lymph node dissection on survival in patients with clinical early-stage ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 May;32(3):e40. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e40.

DOI:10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e40
PMID:33825356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8039180/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact of lymph node dissection on survival in patients with apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with clinical stage I-II EOC. All patients underwent primary surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2003 and December 2015. Demographic features and clinicopathological information as well as perioperative adverse events were investigated, and survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 400 ovarian cancer patients were enrolled, and patients were divided into 2 groups: 81 patients did not undergo lymph node resection (group A), and 319 patients underwent lymph node dissection (group B). In group B, the median number of removed nodes per patient was 25 (21 pelvic and 4 para-aortic nodes). In groups A and B, respectively, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 83.3% and 82.1% (p=0.305), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.1% and 90.9% (p=0.645). The recurrence rate in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was not associated with lymph node dissection (p=0.121). The median operating time was markedly longer in group B than in group A (220 minutes vs. 155 minutes, p<0.001), and group B had a significantly higher incidence of lymph cysts at discharge (32.9% vs. 0.0%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, lymph node dissection was not associated with a gain in OS or PFS and was associated with an increased incidence of perioperative adverse events.

摘要

目的

评估淋巴结清扫术对临床早期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者生存的影响。

方法

我们对中山大学肿瘤防治中心 2003 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间接受初次手术治疗的临床 I 期-II 期 EOC 患者进行了回顾性分析。调查了患者的人口统计学特征和临床病理资料以及围手术期不良事件,并进行了生存分析。

结果

共纳入 400 例卵巢癌患者,分为两组:81 例未行淋巴结切除术(A 组),319 例行淋巴结清扫术(B 组)。B 组患者每例平均切除淋巴结 25 个(21 个盆腔淋巴结和 4 个腹主动脉旁淋巴结)。A、B 组 5 年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为 83.3%和 82.1%(p=0.305),5 年总生存率(OS)分别为 93.1%和 90.9%(p=0.645)。腹膜后淋巴结复发率与淋巴结清扫术无关(p=0.121)。B 组手术时间明显长于 A 组(220 分钟比 155 分钟,p<0.001),B 组术后淋巴囊肿的发生率明显高于 A 组(32.9%比 0.0%,p<0.001)。

结论

在早期卵巢癌患者中,淋巴结清扫术并未带来生存获益,反而增加了围手术期不良事件的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8039180/17ff407296d4/jgo-32-e40-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8039180/e5e2ab8df673/jgo-32-e40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8039180/17ff407296d4/jgo-32-e40-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8039180/e5e2ab8df673/jgo-32-e40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776f/8039180/17ff407296d4/jgo-32-e40-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of lymph node dissection on survival in patients with clinical early-stage ovarian cancer.淋巴结清扫术对临床早期卵巢癌患者生存的影响。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 May;32(3):e40. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e40.
2
The Significance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Early Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.淋巴结清扫术在早期上皮性卵巢癌患者中的意义。
Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(4):628-635. doi: 10.62713/aic.3353.
3
Is there any therapeutic role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in apparent early stage epithelial ovarian cancer?在明显早期上皮性卵巢癌中,盆腹腔和主动脉旁淋巴结切除术有治疗作用吗?
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.028. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
4
Survival impact of number of removed para-aortic lymph nodes in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.Ⅰ期上皮性卵巢癌清扫的腹主动脉旁淋巴结个数对生存的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Feb;305(2):459-465. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06190-9. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
5
Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.FIGO IIIC期和FIGO IIIA1期卵巢癌患者初次肿瘤完全减灭术后的淋巴结受累模式及生存差异:肿瘤库卵巢癌网络的10年回顾性分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1279-86. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4959-4. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging.明显早期上皮性卵巢癌淋巴结转移的危险因素:对手术分期的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Sep;122(3):536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
7
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
8
Lymph node metastasis in grossly apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective clinical study at a tertiary institute.大体可见早期上皮性卵巢癌的淋巴结转移:三级医院的回顾性临床研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2024 Aug 1;20(4):1300-1305. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2489_23. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
9
Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.淋巴结切除术与上皮性卵巢癌生存的关系。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2019 Apr;43(2):151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
10
[Treatment and prognostic analysis of ovarian cancer patients with isolated region of lymph node recurrence].[孤立区域淋巴结复发的卵巢癌患者的治疗及预后分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Dec;47(12):928-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of fluorescent tracers in ovarian cancer surgical navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.荧光示踪剂在卵巢癌手术导航中的应用:系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 26;23(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03967-z.
2
Diagnostic performance of Node-RADS on MRI for a standardized assessment of lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer.Node-RADS在MRI上对卵巢癌淋巴结转移进行标准化评估的诊断性能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05134-0.
3
Predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer by using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival Analysis of Lymph Node Resection in Ovarian Cancer: A Population-Based Study.卵巢癌淋巴结切除术的生存分析:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 19;10:355. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00355. eCollection 2020.
2
A Randomized Trial of Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Neoplasms.随机对照试验在晚期卵巢肿瘤患者中的淋巴结切除术
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):822-832. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808424.
3
Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.淋巴结切除术与上皮性卵巢癌生存的关系。
利用肿瘤内和肿瘤周围的影像组学预测高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者术前淋巴结转移:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01868-x.
4
Earlier is not always better: Optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for ovarian cancer.更早并不总是更好:卵巢癌术后辅助化疗的最佳起始时间。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08095-3.
5
Effect of the Number of Negative Lymph Nodes Removed on the Survival and Recurrence Rate After Primary Surgery in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.卵巢癌患者初次手术后切除的阴性淋巴结数量对生存及复发率的影响:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):536-542. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02077-8. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
6
Immune microenvironment of tumor-draining lymph nodes: insights for immunotherapy.肿瘤引流淋巴结的免疫微环境:免疫治疗的见解
Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 11;16:1562797. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1562797. eCollection 2025.
7
Survival outcomes of lymph node dissection in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: identifying suitable candidates.早期上皮性卵巢癌淋巴结清扫术的生存结局:确定合适的候选者。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov 7;22(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03571-7.
8
Feasibility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前哨淋巴结活检在早期上皮性卵巢癌中的可行性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 14;13(20):3209. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203209.
9
Clinical relevance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early ovarian cancer.前哨淋巴结活检在早期卵巢癌中的临床相关性
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Nov;66(6):498-508. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23114. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
10
Influence of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.淋巴结切除术对早期上皮性卵巢癌患者生存和复发的影响:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02615-6.
Curr Probl Cancer. 2019 Apr;43(2):151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Impact of Surgical Route in Influencing the Risk of Lymphatic Complications After Ovarian Cancer Staging.手术途径对卵巢癌分期后淋巴并发症风险的影响
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):739-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
5
The effect of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.淋巴结切除术对卵巢癌患者生存及复发的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;46(8):718-26. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw068. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
6
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
7
Systematic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of multiple epidemiology studies.系统淋巴结清扫术治疗上皮性卵巢癌:多项流行病学研究的荟萃分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan;45(1):49-60. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu175. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
8
Role of lymphadenectomy for ovarian cancer.淋巴结切除术在卵巢癌治疗中的作用。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(4):279-81. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2014.25.4.279.
9
Laparoscopic staging of apparent early stage ovarian cancer: results of a large, retrospective, multi-institutional series.腹腔镜分期对疑似早期卵巢癌的作用:一项大型回顾性多机构系列研究的结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
Detection of nodal metastases by 18F-FDG PET/CT in apparent early stage ovarian cancer: a prospective study.18F-FDG PET/CT 探测疑似早期卵巢癌的淋巴结转移:一项前瞻性研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Nov;131(2):395-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Aug 27.