Centre for Language and Communication Science Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):594-608. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12616. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Stroke and aphasia can have a profound impact on people's lives, and depression is a common, frequently persistent consequence. Social networks also suffer, with poor social support associated with worse recovery. It is essential to support psychosocial well-being post-stroke, and examine which factors facilitate successful adjustment to living with aphasia.
In the context of a feasibility randomized controlled trial of peer-befriending (SUPERB), this qualitative study explores adjustment for people with aphasia in the post-acute phase of recovery, a phase often neglected in previous research.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 people with aphasia and 10 significant others, who were purposively sampled from the wider group of 56 people with aphasia and 48 significant others. Interviews took place in participants' homes; they were analysed using framework analysis.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Participants with aphasia were 10 women and 10 men; their median (interquartile range-IQR) age was 70 (57.5-77.0) years. Twelve participants had mild aphasia, eight moderate-severe aphasia. Significant others were six women and four men with a median (IQR) age of 70.5 (43-79) years. They identified a range of factors that influenced adjustment to aphasia post-stroke. Some were personal resources, including mood and emotions; identity/sense of self; attitude and outlook; faith and spirituality; and moving forward. Significant others also talked about the impact of becoming carers. Other factors were external sources of support, including familial and other relationships; doctors, nurses and hospital communication; life on the ward; therapies and therapists; psychological support, stroke groups; and community and socializing.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: To promote adjustment in the acute phase, hospital staff should prioritize the humanizing aspects of care provision. In the post-acute phase, clinicians play an integral role in supporting adjustment and can help by focusing on relationship-centred care, monitoring mental health, promoting quality improvement across the continuum of care and supporting advocacy. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Anxiety and depression are common consequences of stroke, with depression rates high at 33% at 1 year post-onset. There is evidence that the psychological needs of people with aphasia are even greater than those of the general stroke population. Social support and social networks are also negatively impacted. Few studies have examined adjustment when people are still in hospital or in the early stages of post-stroke life in the community (< 6 months). Further, many stroke studies exclude people with aphasia. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Adjustment to living with stroke and aphasia begins in the early stages of recovery. While this partly depends on personal resources, many factors depend on external sources of help and support. These include doctors, nurses and hospital communication, their experience of life on the ward, and their therapists' person-centred care. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Clinicians play an integral role in facilitating people with aphasia to utilize their personal resources and support systems to adjust to life after stroke. They can help by focusing on relationship-centred care, monitoring mental health, promoting quality improvement across the continuum of care and supporting advocacy.
中风和失语症会对人们的生活产生深远影响,而抑郁症是一种常见且经常持续存在的后果。社交网络也受到影响,社交支持不佳与康复效果较差相关。支持中风后的心理社会健康至关重要,并研究哪些因素有助于成功适应失语症。
在一项针对同伴支持(SUPERB)的可行性随机对照试验的背景下,本定性研究探讨了处于康复后急性阶段的失语症患者的调整情况,这一阶段在以往研究中往往被忽视。
对 20 名失语症患者和 10 名重要他人进行了半结构化访谈,他们是从更广泛的 56 名失语症患者和 48 名重要他人中有意选择的。访谈在参与者的家中进行,使用框架分析进行分析。
失语症患者 10 名女性,10 名男性;他们的中位(四分位数范围-IQR)年龄为 70(57.5-77.0)岁。12 名参与者有轻度失语症,8 名有中度至重度失语症。重要他人 6 名女性,4 名男性,中位(IQR)年龄为 70.5(43-79)岁。他们确定了影响中风后失语症调整的一系列因素。其中一些是个人资源,包括情绪和情感;身份/自我意识;态度和前景;信仰和灵性;以及向前迈进。重要他人还谈到了成为照顾者的影响。其他因素是外部支持来源,包括家庭和其他关系;医生、护士和医院沟通;病房生活;治疗和治疗师;心理支持、中风小组;以及社区和社交。
为了在急性阶段促进调整,医院工作人员应优先考虑提供人性化的护理。在康复后期,临床医生在支持调整方面发挥着不可或缺的作用,通过关注以关系为中心的护理、监测心理健康、促进整个护理连续体的质量改进以及支持倡导,可以提供帮助。
本文的意义
焦虑和抑郁是中风的常见后果,发病后 1 年的抑郁发生率高达 33%。有证据表明,失语症患者的心理需求甚至大于一般中风患者。社交支持和社交网络也受到负面影响。很少有研究探讨过当人们仍在医院或中风后社区生活的早期阶段(<6 个月)时的调整情况。此外,许多中风研究都排除了失语症患者。
适应与中风和失语症共存的生活始于康复的早期阶段。虽然这在一定程度上取决于个人资源,但许多因素取决于外部帮助和支持来源。这些因素包括医生、护士和医院沟通、他们在病房的体验以及治疗师的以患者为中心的护理。
这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?临床医生在帮助失语症患者利用个人资源和支持系统适应中风后的生活方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。他们可以通过关注以关系为中心的护理、监测心理健康、促进整个护理连续体的质量改进以及支持倡导来提供帮助。