Frings-Meuthen Petra, Henkel Sara, Boschmann Michael, Chilibeck Philip D, Alvero Cruz José Ramón, Hoffmann Fabian, Möstl Stefan, Mittag Uwe, Mulder Edwin, Rittweger Natia, Sies Wolfram, Tanaka Hirofumi, Rittweger Jörn
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint co-operation between Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 22;12:641455. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.641455. eCollection 2021.
Resting energy expenditure (REE) is determined mainly by fat-free mass (FFM). FFM depends also on daily physical activity. REE normally decreases with increased age due to decreases in FFM and physical activity. Measuring REE is essential for estimating total energy expenditure. As such, there are a number of different equations in use to predict REE. In recent years, an increasing number of older adults continue to participate in competitive sports creating the surge of master athletes. It is currently unclear if these equations developed primarily for the general population are also valid for highly active, older master athletes. Therefore, we tested the validity of six commonly-used equations for predicting REE in master athletes. In conjunction with the World Masters Athletic Championship in Malaga, Spain, we measured REE in 113 master athletes by indirect calorimetry. The most commonly used equations to predict REE [Harris & Benedict (H&B), World Health Organization (WHO), Müller (MÜL), Müller-FFM (MÜL-FFM), Cunningham (CUN), and De Lorenzo (LOR)] were tested for their accuracies. The influences of age, sex, height, body weight, FFM, training hours per week, phase angle, ambient temperature, and athletic specialization on REE were determined. All estimated REEs for the general population differed significantly from the measured ones (H&B, WHO, MÜL, MÜL-FFM, CUN, all < 0.005). The equation put forward by De Lorenzo provided the most accurate prediction of REE for master athletes, closely followed by FFM-based Cunningham's equation. The accuracy of the remaining commonly-used prediction equations to estimate REE in master athletes are less accurate. Body weight ( < 0.001), FFM ( < 0.001), FM ( = 0.007), sex ( = 0.045) and interestingly temperature ( = 0.004) are the significant predictors of REE. We conclude that REE in master athletes is primarily determined by body composition and ambient temperature. Our study provides a first estimate of energy requirements for master athletes in order to cover adequately athletes' energy and nutrient requirements to maintain their health status and physical performance.
静息能量消耗(REE)主要由去脂体重(FFM)决定。FFM也取决于日常身体活动。由于FFM和身体活动减少,REE通常会随着年龄增长而降低。测量REE对于估算总能量消耗至关重要。因此,有许多不同的方程用于预测REE。近年来,越来越多的老年人继续参加竞技运动,导致大师级运动员数量激增。目前尚不清楚这些主要为普通人群开发的方程是否也适用于高活跃度的老年大师级运动员。因此,我们测试了六个常用方程预测大师级运动员REE的有效性。结合在西班牙马拉加举行的世界大师田径锦标赛,我们通过间接测热法测量了113名大师级运动员的REE。测试了预测REE最常用的方程[哈里斯和本尼迪克特(H&B)、世界卫生组织(WHO)、米勒(MÜL)、米勒去脂体重(MÜL-FFM)、坎宁安(CUN)和德洛伦佐(LOR)]的准确性。确定了年龄、性别、身高、体重、FFM、每周训练时长、相位角、环境温度和运动专项对REE的影响。所有针对普通人群估算的REE与测量值均有显著差异(H&B、WHO、MÜL、MÜL-FFM、CUN,均P<0.005)。德洛伦佐提出的方程对大师级运动员的REE预测最为准确,紧随其后的是基于FFM的坎宁安方程。其余常用预测方程估算大师级运动员REE的准确性较低。体重(P<0.001)、FFM(P<0.001)、体脂(P=0.007)、性别(P=0.045)以及有趣地还有温度(P=0.004)是REE的显著预测因素。我们得出结论,大师级运动员的REE主要由身体成分和环境温度决定。我们的研究首次估算了大师级运动员的能量需求,以便充分满足运动员的能量和营养需求,维持他们的健康状况和身体表现。