Suppr超能文献

ICON-MIGHTI热层风观测的验证:1. 夜间红线地基法布里-珀罗干涉仪。

Validation of ICON-MIGHTI Thermospheric Wind Observations: 1. Nighttime Red-Line Ground-Based Fabry-Perot Interferometers.

作者信息

Makela Jonathan J, Baughman Matthew, Navarro Luis A, Harding Brian J, Englert Christoph R, Harlander John M, Marr Kenneth D, Benkhaldoun Zouhair, Kaab Mohamed, Immel Thomas J

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Geophys Res Space Phys. 2021 Feb;126(2). doi: 10.1029/2020ja028726. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

Abstract

Observations of the nighttime thermospheric wind from two ground-based Fabry-Perot Interferometers are compared to the level 2.1 and 2.2 data products from the Michelson Interferometer Global High-resolution Thermospheric Imaging (MIGHTI) onboard National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Ionospheric Connection Explorer to assess and validate the methodology used to generate measurements of neutral thermospheric winds observed by MIGHTI. We find generally good agreement between observations approximately coincident in space and time with mean differences less than 11 m/s in magnitude and standard deviations of about 20-35 m/s. These results indicate that the independent calculations of the zero-wind reference used by the different instruments do not contain strong systematic or physical biases, even though the observations were acquired during solar minimum conditions when the measured airglow intensity is weak. We argue that the slight differences in the estimated wind quantities between the two instrument types can be attributed to gradients in the airglow and thermospheric wind fields and the differing viewing geometries used by the instruments.

摘要

将两台地基法布里-珀罗干涉仪对夜间热层风的观测结果,与美国国家航空航天局电离层连接探测器上的迈克尔逊干涉仪全球高分辨率热层成像仪(MIGHTI)生成的2.1级和2.2级数据产品进行比较,以评估和验证用于生成MIGHTI观测到的中性热层风测量值的方法。我们发现,在空间和时间上大致重合的观测结果之间总体上具有良好的一致性,平均差异的幅度小于11米/秒,标准差约为20 - 35米/秒。这些结果表明,尽管观测是在太阳活动极小期进行的,此时测量到的气辉强度较弱,但不同仪器对零风参考的独立计算并不包含强烈的系统偏差或物理偏差。我们认为,两种仪器类型之间估计风参数的细微差异可归因于气辉和热层风场的梯度以及仪器所采用的不同观测几何结构。

相似文献

5
The MIGHTI Wind Retrieval Algorithm: Description and Verification.MIGHTI风场反演算法:描述与验证
Space Sci Rev. 2017 Oct;212(1-2):585-600. doi: 10.1007/s11214-017-0359-3. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
Comparison of TIDI Line of Sight Winds With ICON-MIGHTI Measurements.TIDI视线风与ICON - MIGHTI测量值的比较。
J Geophys Res Space Phys. 2023 Feb;128(2):e2022JA030910. doi: 10.1029/2022JA030910. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ionospheric Connection Explorer - Prime Mission Review.电离层连接探测器——主要任务评估
Space Sci Rev. 2023;219(5):41. doi: 10.1007/s11214-023-00975-x. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Comparison of TIDI Line of Sight Winds With ICON-MIGHTI Measurements.TIDI视线风与ICON - MIGHTI测量值的比较。
J Geophys Res Space Phys. 2023 Feb;128(2):e2022JA030910. doi: 10.1029/2022JA030910. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

3
The MIGHTI Wind Retrieval Algorithm: Description and Verification.MIGHTI风场反演算法:描述与验证
Space Sci Rev. 2017 Oct;212(1-2):585-600. doi: 10.1007/s11214-017-0359-3. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验