Makela Jonathan J, Baughman Matthew, Navarro Luis A, Harding Brian J, Englert Christoph R, Harlander John M, Marr Kenneth D, Benkhaldoun Zouhair, Kaab Mohamed, Immel Thomas J
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
J Geophys Res Space Phys. 2021 Feb;126(2). doi: 10.1029/2020ja028726. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
Observations of the nighttime thermospheric wind from two ground-based Fabry-Perot Interferometers are compared to the level 2.1 and 2.2 data products from the Michelson Interferometer Global High-resolution Thermospheric Imaging (MIGHTI) onboard National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Ionospheric Connection Explorer to assess and validate the methodology used to generate measurements of neutral thermospheric winds observed by MIGHTI. We find generally good agreement between observations approximately coincident in space and time with mean differences less than 11 m/s in magnitude and standard deviations of about 20-35 m/s. These results indicate that the independent calculations of the zero-wind reference used by the different instruments do not contain strong systematic or physical biases, even though the observations were acquired during solar minimum conditions when the measured airglow intensity is weak. We argue that the slight differences in the estimated wind quantities between the two instrument types can be attributed to gradients in the airglow and thermospheric wind fields and the differing viewing geometries used by the instruments.
将两台地基法布里-珀罗干涉仪对夜间热层风的观测结果,与美国国家航空航天局电离层连接探测器上的迈克尔逊干涉仪全球高分辨率热层成像仪(MIGHTI)生成的2.1级和2.2级数据产品进行比较,以评估和验证用于生成MIGHTI观测到的中性热层风测量值的方法。我们发现,在空间和时间上大致重合的观测结果之间总体上具有良好的一致性,平均差异的幅度小于11米/秒,标准差约为20 - 35米/秒。这些结果表明,尽管观测是在太阳活动极小期进行的,此时测量到的气辉强度较弱,但不同仪器对零风参考的独立计算并不包含强烈的系统偏差或物理偏差。我们认为,两种仪器类型之间估计风参数的细微差异可归因于气辉和热层风场的梯度以及仪器所采用的不同观测几何结构。