Suppr超能文献

蹲训过程中速度损失对神经肌肉表现的影响。

Effect of velocity loss during squat training on neuromuscular performance.

机构信息

Physical Performance & Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.

Department of Sport and Computer Science, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Aug;31(8):1621-1635. doi: 10.1111/sms.13967. Epub 2021 May 14.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effects of three resistance training (RT) programs differing in the magnitude of velocity loss (VL) allowed in each exercise set: 10%, 30%, or 45% on changes in strength, vertical jump, sprint performance, and EMG variables. Thirty-three young men were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (VL10%, VL30%, and VL45%; n = 11 each) that performed a velocity-based RT program for 8 weeks using only the full squat exercise (SQ). Training load (55-70% 1RM), frequency (2 sessions/week), number of sets (3), and inter-set recovery (4 min) were identical for all groups. Running sprint (20 m), countermovement jump (CMJ), 1RM, muscle endurance, and EMG during SQ were assessed pre- and post-training. All groups showed significant (VL10%: 6.4-58.6%; VL30%: 4.5-66.2%; VL45%: 1.8-52.1%; p < 0.05-0.001) improvements in muscle strength and muscle endurance. However, a significant group × time interaction (p < 0.05) was observed in CMJ, with VL10% showing greater increments (11.9%) than VL30% and VL45%. In addition, VL10% resulted in greater percent change in sprint performance than the other two groups (VL10%: -2.4%; VL30%: -1.8%; and VL45%: -0.5%). No significant changes in EMG variables were observed for any group. RT with loads of 55-70% 1RM characterized by a low-velocity loss (VL10%) provides a very effective and efficient training stimulus since it yields similar strength gains and greater improvements in sports-related neuromuscular performance (jump and sprint) compared to training with higher velocity losses (VL30%, VL45%). These findings indicate that the magnitude of VL reached in each exercise set considerably influences the observed training adaptations.

摘要

本研究旨在比较三种抗阻训练(RT)方案的效果,这三种方案在每个练习组中允许的速度损失(VL)幅度不同:10%、30%或 45%。研究比较了这三种方案对力量、垂直跳跃、短跑表现和肌电图变量变化的影响。33 名年轻男性被随机分配到三个实验组(VL10%、VL30%和 VL45%;每组 11 人),他们使用全蹲练习(SQ)进行了为期 8 周的基于速度的 RT 方案。所有组的训练负荷(55-70%1RM)、频率(每周 2 次)、组数(3 组)和组间恢复(4 分钟)均相同。训练前和训练后评估了所有组的短跑(20 米)、深蹲跳(CMJ)、1RM、肌肉耐力和 SQ 时的肌电图。所有组的肌肉力量和肌肉耐力均显著提高(VL10%:6.4-58.6%;VL30%:4.5-66.2%;VL45%:1.8-52.1%;p<0.05-0.001)。然而,在 CMJ 中观察到了显著的组间时间交互作用(p<0.05),VL10% 组的增量(11.9%)大于 VL30% 和 VL45% 组。此外,VL10% 组的短跑表现百分比变化大于其他两组(VL10%:-2.4%;VL30%:-1.8%;VL45%:-0.5%)。任何组的肌电图变量均无显著变化。负荷为 55-70%1RM 的 RT,其特点是 VL 较低(VL10%),提供了非常有效和高效的训练刺激,因为与训练 VL 较高(VL30%、VL45%)相比,它可产生相似的力量增益和更大的运动相关神经肌肉表现(跳跃和短跑)改善。这些发现表明,每个练习组中达到的 VL 幅度对观察到的训练适应有很大影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验