Physical Performance & Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Department of Sport and Computer Science, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Aug;31(8):1621-1635. doi: 10.1111/sms.13967. Epub 2021 May 14.
This study aimed to compare the effects of three resistance training (RT) programs differing in the magnitude of velocity loss (VL) allowed in each exercise set: 10%, 30%, or 45% on changes in strength, vertical jump, sprint performance, and EMG variables. Thirty-three young men were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (VL10%, VL30%, and VL45%; n = 11 each) that performed a velocity-based RT program for 8 weeks using only the full squat exercise (SQ). Training load (55-70% 1RM), frequency (2 sessions/week), number of sets (3), and inter-set recovery (4 min) were identical for all groups. Running sprint (20 m), countermovement jump (CMJ), 1RM, muscle endurance, and EMG during SQ were assessed pre- and post-training. All groups showed significant (VL10%: 6.4-58.6%; VL30%: 4.5-66.2%; VL45%: 1.8-52.1%; p < 0.05-0.001) improvements in muscle strength and muscle endurance. However, a significant group × time interaction (p < 0.05) was observed in CMJ, with VL10% showing greater increments (11.9%) than VL30% and VL45%. In addition, VL10% resulted in greater percent change in sprint performance than the other two groups (VL10%: -2.4%; VL30%: -1.8%; and VL45%: -0.5%). No significant changes in EMG variables were observed for any group. RT with loads of 55-70% 1RM characterized by a low-velocity loss (VL10%) provides a very effective and efficient training stimulus since it yields similar strength gains and greater improvements in sports-related neuromuscular performance (jump and sprint) compared to training with higher velocity losses (VL30%, VL45%). These findings indicate that the magnitude of VL reached in each exercise set considerably influences the observed training adaptations.
本研究旨在比较三种抗阻训练(RT)方案的效果,这三种方案在每个练习组中允许的速度损失(VL)幅度不同:10%、30%或 45%。研究比较了这三种方案对力量、垂直跳跃、短跑表现和肌电图变量变化的影响。33 名年轻男性被随机分配到三个实验组(VL10%、VL30%和 VL45%;每组 11 人),他们使用全蹲练习(SQ)进行了为期 8 周的基于速度的 RT 方案。所有组的训练负荷(55-70%1RM)、频率(每周 2 次)、组数(3 组)和组间恢复(4 分钟)均相同。训练前和训练后评估了所有组的短跑(20 米)、深蹲跳(CMJ)、1RM、肌肉耐力和 SQ 时的肌电图。所有组的肌肉力量和肌肉耐力均显著提高(VL10%:6.4-58.6%;VL30%:4.5-66.2%;VL45%:1.8-52.1%;p<0.05-0.001)。然而,在 CMJ 中观察到了显著的组间时间交互作用(p<0.05),VL10% 组的增量(11.9%)大于 VL30% 和 VL45% 组。此外,VL10% 组的短跑表现百分比变化大于其他两组(VL10%:-2.4%;VL30%:-1.8%;VL45%:-0.5%)。任何组的肌电图变量均无显著变化。负荷为 55-70%1RM 的 RT,其特点是 VL 较低(VL10%),提供了非常有效和高效的训练刺激,因为与训练 VL 较高(VL30%、VL45%)相比,它可产生相似的力量增益和更大的运动相关神经肌肉表现(跳跃和短跑)改善。这些发现表明,每个练习组中达到的 VL 幅度对观察到的训练适应有很大影响。