Suppr超能文献

参保的阿片类药物使用障碍成年人的预防和慢性病护理质量。

Quality of Preventive and Chronic Illness Care for Insured Adults With Opioid Use Disorder.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214925. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4925.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Nearly all initiatives to improve care for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) have focused on improving OUD identification and treatment. Whether individuals with OUD have lower quality of care than individuals without OUD remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To measure quality of non-OUD preventive and chronic illness care and care coordination for individuals with OUD compared with individuals without OUD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study of deidentified data on outpatients throughout the US was conducted. Claims for 79 372 commercially insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees aged 18 years or older with diagnosis codes for OUD between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, and 46 601 individuals without OUD were included in the analysis.

EXPOSURE

Diagnosis of OUD.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Quality indicator performance was calculated, using claims for individuals with OUD and matched comparators without OUD. Within 3 domains of outpatient care quality (preventive care, chronic illness care, and care coordination), 6 indicators used in accountability programs were selected. Performance for individuals with and without OUD was compared, and logistic regression was used to analyze sociodemographic and comorbidity characteristics associated with higher quality of health care.

RESULTS

The study included 125 973 individuals, including 69 466 (55.1%) women and 78 225 (62.1%) White individuals, with a mean (SD) age of 59.0 (16.1) years. For the preventive care measure examining breast cancer screening, performance for the OUD cohort was 55.4% (95% CI, 54.7%-56.0%) compared with 65.6% (95% CI, 64.4%-66.7%) for individuals without OUD (P < .001). Quality of care for adherence to statin therapy was lower for individuals with OUD (70.4%; 95% CI, 68.7%-72.1%) compared with individuals without OUD (76.7%; 95% CI, 74.4%-78.7%) (P < .001) and for the hemoglobin A1c testing indicator (OUD: 80.9%; 95% CI, 80.4%-81.5%; comparator: 85.8%; 95% CI, 84.9%-86.8%; P < .001). Care coordination quality also was lower for individuals with OUD compared with those without OUD for mental health follow-up (OUD: 45.3%; 95% CI, 44.6%-46.0%; comparator: 52.5%; 95% CI, 50.0%-55.0%; P < .001) and for potentially avoidable hospitalizations for chronic conditions (OUD: 11.4%; 95% CI, 11.2%-11.7%; comparator: 8.8%; 95% CI, 8.3%-9.2%; P < .001) and diabetes, where a lower score indicates higher quality (OUD: 2.4%; 95% CI, 2.3%-2.5%; comparator: 1.9%; 95% CI, 1.7%-2.1%; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that individuals with OUD have moderately lower quality of care across preventive and chronic illness care and care coordination for non-OUD care compared with individuals without OUD. More attention to measurement and improvement of non-OUD care for these individuals is needed.

摘要

重要性

几乎所有旨在改善阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者护理的举措都侧重于改善 OUD 的识别和治疗。OUD 患者的护理质量是否低于非 OUD 患者尚不清楚。

目的

比较 OUD 患者和非 OUD 患者的非 OUD 预防和慢性疾病护理以及非 OUD 护理的协调性。

设计、地点和参与者:对美国各地门诊患者的匿名数据进行了一项横断面研究。在 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间,对有 OUD 诊断代码的 79372 名商业保险和医疗保险优势计划的 18 岁或以上参保者和 46601 名无 OUD 的参保者进行了分析。

暴露情况

OUD 诊断。

主要结果和措施

使用 OUD 患者和无 OUD 匹配对照者的索赔计算了质量指标的表现。在门诊护理质量的 3 个领域(预防保健、慢性疾病护理和护理协调)中,选择了在问责制计划中使用的 6 个指标。比较了有和无 OUD 患者的表现,并使用逻辑回归分析了与更高质量医疗保健相关的社会人口学和合并症特征。

结果

研究包括 125973 名患者,其中 69466 名(55.1%)为女性,78225 名(62.1%)为白人,平均(SD)年龄为 59.0(16.1)岁。在预防性保健措施中,检查乳腺癌筛查,OUD 队列的表现为 55.4%(95%CI,54.7%-56.0%),而无 OUD 患者为 65.6%(95%CI,64.4%-66.7%)(P<0.001)。与无 OUD 患者(76.7%;95%CI,74.4%-78.7%)相比,OUD 患者的他汀类药物治疗依从性(70.4%;95%CI,68.7%-72.1%)和血红蛋白 A1c 检测指标(OUD:80.9%;95%CI,80.4%-81.5%;比较组:85.8%;95%CI,84.9%-86.8%)(P<0.001)的治疗质量较低。与无 OUD 患者相比,OUD 患者的心理健康随访(OUD:45.3%;95%CI,44.6%-46.0%;比较组:52.5%;95%CI,50.0%-55.0%)和慢性疾病潜在可避免住院治疗(OUD:11.4%;95%CI,11.2%-11.7%;比较组:8.8%;95%CI,8.3%-9.2%)的协调质量也较低(P<0.001),对于糖尿病,较低的分数表示更高的质量(OUD:2.4%;95%CI,2.3%-2.5%;比较组:1.9%;95%CI,1.7%-2.1%;P=0.001)。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,与非 OUD 患者相比,OUD 患者在非 OUD 预防和慢性疾病护理以及非 OUD 护理的协调性方面的护理质量中等偏低。需要更多地关注这些患者的非 OUD 护理的衡量和改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8215/8033422/a4cceb9a4099/jamanetwopen-e214925-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验