Functional Breast Unit, National Cancer Institute of Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Clinical and Epidemiological Cancer Research Group, National Cancer Institute of Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6014-6021. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09907-x. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
The staging of breast cancer has been based on tumor size, lymph node involvement, and presence or absence of distant metastases. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in its eighth edition incorporates hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and histologic grade due to their prognostic importance. In Latin America, however, the impact of the new edition is unknown. This article evaluates the performance of the AJCC eighth-edition staging system in a cohort of patients with breast cancer at a reference center in Colombia.
The study investigated a descriptive cohort of 912 patients who received complete treatment for non-metastatic invasive breast cancer and had information on the anatomic stage and biologic factors,. All the patients were restaged using the AJCC eighth-edition classification. Changes in clinical stages and differences between the two classifications were compared.
The study enrolled 912 patients. Changes in staging occurred for 54.82% (downstaging for 40.3% and upstaging for 14.47%) of these patients. For recurrence-free survival, the C-Index of the eighth-edition AJCC was 0.726, and the AIC was 1323.7, whereas the C-Index of the seventh-edition AJCC was 0.731, and the AIC was 1314.3 (p = 0.99).
The seventh and eighth editions of the AJCC staging system have similar predictive values in our population for recurrence-free survival. Future studies are necessary to evaluate the performance of the AJCC eighth-edition staging system in predicting overall survival.
乳腺癌的分期一直基于肿瘤大小、淋巴结受累情况以及有无远处转移。美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第八版分期系统纳入了激素受体、人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)和组织学分级,因为它们具有预后意义。然而,在拉丁美洲,新版分期系统的影响尚不清楚。本文评估了 AJCC 第八版分期系统在哥伦比亚一家参考中心的乳腺癌患者队列中的表现。
该研究调查了一个描述性队列,共 912 名接受了非转移性浸润性乳腺癌完整治疗且具有解剖分期和生物学因素信息的患者。所有患者均采用 AJCC 第八版分类进行重新分期。比较了临床分期的变化和两种分类之间的差异。
该研究纳入了 912 名患者。其中 54.82%(降期 40.3%,升期 14.47%)的患者分期发生了变化。对于无复发生存,第八版 AJCC 的 C 指数为 0.726,AIC 为 1323.7,而第七版 AJCC 的 C 指数为 0.731,AIC 为 1314.3(p=0.99)。
在我们的人群中,第七版和第八版 AJCC 分期系统在无复发生存方面具有相似的预测价值。未来的研究有必要评估 AJCC 第八版分期系统在预测总生存方面的性能。