Suppr超能文献

艺术和人文学科在医学教育中如何应用?系统评价的结果。

How Are the Arts and Humanities Used in Medical Education? Results of a Scoping Review.

机构信息

T. Moniz is associate professor, Department of Communication Studies, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5078-4611 .

M. Golafshani is a second-year medical student, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2021 Aug 1;96(8):1213-1222. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004118. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although focused reviews have characterized subsets of the literature on the arts and humanities in medical education, a large-scale overview of the field is needed to inform efforts to strengthen these approaches in medicine.

METHOD

The authors conducted a scoping review in 2019 to identify how the arts and humanities are used to educate physicians and interprofessional learners across the medical education continuum in Canada and the United States. A search strategy involving 7 databases identified 21,985 citations. Five reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts. Full-text screening followed (n = 4,649). Of these, 769 records met the inclusion criteria. The authors performed descriptive and statistical analyses and conducted semistructured interviews with 15 stakeholders.

RESULTS

The literature is dominated by conceptual works (n = 294) that critically engaged with arts and humanities approaches or generally called for their use in medical education, followed by program descriptions (n = 255). The literary arts (n = 197) were most common. Less than a third of records explicitly engaged theory as a strong component (n = 230). Of descriptive and empirical records (n = 424), more than half concerned undergraduate medical education (n = 245). There were gaps in the literature on interprofessional education, program evaluation, and learner assessment. Programming was most often taught by medical faculty who published their initiatives (n = 236). Absent were voices of contributing artists, docents, and other arts and humanities practitioners from outside medicine. Stakeholders confirmed that these findings resonated with their experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

This literature is characterized by brief, episodic installments, privileging a biomedical orientation and largely lacking a theoretical frame to weave the installments into a larger story that accumulates over time and across subfields. These findings should inform efforts to promote, integrate, and study uses of the arts and humanities in medical education.

摘要

目的

尽管重点综述已经描述了医学教育中艺术和人文学科文献的各个部分,但需要对该领域进行大规模的概述,以便为加强医学领域的这些方法提供信息。

方法

作者于 2019 年进行了范围界定审查,以确定加拿大和美国的整个医学教育连续体中,艺术和人文学科如何用于教育医师和跨专业学习者。一项涉及 7 个数据库的搜索策略确定了 21985 个引文。五名审查员独立筛选标题和摘要。随后进行了全文筛选(n = 4649)。其中,769 条记录符合纳入标准。作者进行了描述性和统计分析,并对 15 名利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。

结果

文献主要由概念性作品(n = 294)主导,这些作品批判性地探讨了艺术和人文学科方法,或普遍呼吁在医学教育中使用这些方法,其次是方案描述(n = 255)。文学艺术(n = 197)最为常见。不到三分之一的记录明确将理论作为一个重要组成部分(n = 230)。在描述性和实证记录(n = 424)中,超过一半涉及本科医学教育(n = 245)。在跨专业教育、方案评估和学习者评估方面存在文献空白。方案大多由发表其倡议的医学教师教授(n = 236)。缺乏来自医学领域之外的艺术和人文学科从业者,如艺术家、讲解员等的声音。利益相关者证实,这些发现与他们的经验产生了共鸣。

结论

这些文献的特点是简短的、偶尔的片段,优先考虑生物医学方向,并且在很大程度上缺乏一个理论框架,无法将这些片段编织成一个随着时间的推移和跨子领域不断积累的更大的故事。这些发现应该为促进、整合和研究医学教育中艺术和人文学科的使用提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验