Ancient DNA Lab, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, Irakleio, GR70013, Greece.
Ancient DNA Lab, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB), Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, Irakleio, GR70013, Greece.
Anal Biochem. 2021 Jun 15;623:114193. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2021.114193. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
Technological advancements have revolutionized ancient and degraded DNA analysis, moving the field to the Next Generation Sequencing era. One of the advancements, the ancient DNA-oriented high-throughput library preparation methods, enabled the sequencing of more endogenous molecules. Although fairly optimized, both single- and double-stranded library preparation methods hold the potential for further improvement. Here, we test a series of modifications made at different steps of both single- and double-stranded library preparation methods. Given all the modifications tested, we found that two of them provide further benefits, including the use of Endonuclease VIII as a pre-treatment step before preparing single-stranded libraries and the use of a modified second adapter of the single stranded-libraries as an alternative option to enable sequencing of single stranded-libraries with the standard Illumina sequencing primer instead of the custom designed as described in the single stranded library preparation method. Furthermore, we propose uracil-DNA-glycosylase (UDG) could also be considered for both single- and double-stranded library preparation methods, although additional parameters should be taken into account depending on the sequencing strategy and the sample characteristics. Further modifications were also tested and although they were not advantageous, they could be considered as equivalent to the published options.
技术进步彻底改变了古老而退化的 DNA 分析,将该领域推向了新一代测序时代。其中一项进步是面向古 DNA 的高通量文库制备方法,它使更多内源性分子的测序成为可能。尽管这两种单链和双链文库制备方法已经相当优化,但它们都有可能进一步改进。在这里,我们测试了在单链和双链文库制备方法的不同步骤中进行的一系列修改。在所有测试的修改中,我们发现其中两个提供了进一步的好处,包括在制备单链文库之前使用内切核酸酶 VIII 作为预处理步骤,以及使用改良的单链文库的第二个接头作为替代选项,以便使用标准的 Illumina 测序引物而不是定制设计的引物来测序单链文库,如单链文库制备方法中所述。此外,我们还提出尿嘧啶-DNA-糖基化酶 (UDG) 也可以用于单链和双链文库制备方法,尽管根据测序策略和样本特征,还需要考虑其他参数。我们还测试了进一步的修改,尽管它们没有优势,但可以被认为与已发表的选项等效。