Suppr超能文献

保乳术后放疗中常规部分乳腺照射与超分割部分乳腺照射技术在低危老年乳腺癌患者中的应用:肿瘤学结局和晚期毒性的比较分析。

APBI Versus Ultra-APBI in the Elderly With Low-Risk Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Oncological Outcome and Late Toxicity.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Cote d'Azur, Nice, France.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Cote d'Azur, Nice, France.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Sep 1;111(1):56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.052. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) represents a validated technique for low-risk breast cancer. Recently, ultra-APBI (uAPBI) using fewer than 5 fractions was described in the literature. We compared clinical outcomes and late toxicity after APBI or uAPBI in older patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two cohorts of older patients (aged ≥70 years) with low-risk breast cancer treated with APBI (interstitial brachytherapy) were analyzed retrospectively. A total dose of 34 Gy in10 fractions (APBI) or 16 Gy in 1 fraction (uAPBI) was delivered from 2004 to 2012 and from 2013 to 2018, respectively. Oncologic outcome analyzed the cumulative incidence of local relapse, regional relapse, and distant metastases with disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival. Late toxicity and cosmetic results were investigated.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-seven patients (APBI, n = 109 patients; uAPBI, n = 48 patients) underwent APBI according to the same selection criteria. Apart from the median follow-up (97 vs 72 months for APBI and uAPBI; P < .002), no significant difference was noted between the 2 groups. Regarding 6-year oncologic outcome, no significant difference was observed between APBI and uAPBI for local recurrence (1.3% vs 0%; P = .4), regional recurrence (2.5% vs 2.3%; P = .9), distant metastases (4.3% vs. 2.4%; P = .6), disease-free survival (85.2% vs. 82.2%; P = .8), cause-specific survival (96.7% vs. 96.2%; P = .9), and overall survival (86.7% vs. 82.2%; P = .7). Regarding late toxicity, no significant difference was observed between APBI and uAPBI (total complication number, 45 vs 33%; P = .173) with only grade 1 (88.4% vs. 95%) and grade 2 (11.6% vs. 5%) late toxicities (P = .677). Similarly, no significant difference was observed for excellent/good cosmetic results between the 2 cohorts (P = .98).

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first study comparing APBI versus uAPBI in a cohort of older patients with low-risk breast cancer. No significant difference was found between the 2 treatment groups regarding oncologic outcome, late toxicity, and cosmetic result. uAPBI based on a single fraction of brachytherapy represents an attractive option for therapeutic de-escalation in older patients with breast cancer.

摘要

目的

加速部分乳房照射(APBI)是一种针对低危乳腺癌的有效技术。最近,文献中描述了使用少于 5 个分次的超 APBI(uAPBI)。我们比较了高龄患者接受 APBI 或 uAPBI 的临床结果和晚期毒性。

方法和材料

回顾性分析了两组接受 APBI(间质近距离放疗)治疗的高龄(≥70 岁)低危乳腺癌患者。从 2004 年至 2012 年,采用 34 Gy 10 次(APBI)或 16 Gy 1 次(uAPBI)的总剂量,从 2013 年至 2018 年。肿瘤学结果分析局部复发、区域复发和远处转移的累积发生率,包括无病生存率、疾病特异性生存率和总生存率。调查了晚期毒性和美容效果。

结果

157 例患者(APBI,n=109 例;uAPBI,n=48 例)根据相同的选择标准接受 APBI。除中位随访时间(APBI 为 97 个月,uAPBI 为 72 个月;P<0.002)外,两组间无显著差异。6 年肿瘤学结果方面,APBI 和 uAPBI 的局部复发(1.3%比 0%;P=0.4)、区域复发(2.5%比 2.3%;P=0.9)、远处转移(4.3%比 2.4%;P=0.6)、无病生存率(85.2%比 82.2%;P=0.8)、疾病特异性生存率(96.7%比 96.2%;P=0.9)和总生存率(86.7%比 82.2%;P=0.7)无显著差异。晚期毒性方面,APBI 和 uAPBI 无显著差异(总并发症数,45%比 33%;P=0.173),仅为 1 级(88.4%比 95%)和 2 级(11.6%比 5%)晚期毒性(P=0.677)。同样,两组间美容效果的优秀/良好比例无显著差异(P=0.98)。

结论

我们报告了第一项比较 APBI 与 uAPBI 在低危乳腺癌高龄患者中的研究。两组患者在肿瘤学结果、晚期毒性和美容效果方面无显著差异。基于单次近距离放疗的 uAPBI 为乳腺癌老年患者的治疗降级提供了一种有吸引力的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验