Hannoun-Levi Jean-Michel, Chamorey Emmanuel, Boulahssass Rabia, Polgar Csaba, Strnad Vratislav
Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, University of Cote d'Azur, Nice, France.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 Apr 22;29:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.04.005. eCollection 2021 Jul.
PURPOSE: Breast cancer in the elderly has become a public health concern; there is a need to re-design its treatment with a view to de-escalation. Our paper sets out the rationale for a phase 3 randomized trial to evaluate less burdensome adjuvant procedures that remain effective and efficient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For low-risk breast cancer in the elderly, adjuvant treatment has been adjusted in order to make it more suitable and efficient. Hypofractionated radiation therapy based on accelerated or non-accelerated regimens as well as accelerated and ultra-accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) protocols were reviewed. Withdrawal of radiation (RT) or endocrine therapies (ET) from the adjuvant procedure were also investigated. Based on molecular and APBI classifications, inclusion criteria were discussed. RESULTS: Phase 3 randomized trials which compared standard vs. accelerated/non-accelerated hypofractionated regimens confirmed that the latter were non-inferior in terms of local control. Similarly, except for intraoperative-based techniques, APBI achieved non-inferior local control rates compared to whole breast irradiation for low-risk breast cancer. In phase 2 prospective trials using ultra APBI, encouraging results were observed regarding oncological outcome and toxicity profile. In phase 3 trials, adjuvant ET without RT significantly increased the rate of local relapse with no impact on overall survival while RT alone proved effective. Elderly patients aged 60 or more with low-risk, luminal A breast cancer were chosen as the target population in a phase 3 randomized trial comparing APBI + 5-year ET vs. uAPBI (16 Gy 1f) alone. CONCLUSION: To investigate de-escalation adjuvant treatment for elderly breast cancer patients, we have defined a road map for testing more convenient strategies. This EPOPE phase 3 randomized trial is supported by the GEC-ESTRO breast cancer working group.
目的:老年乳腺癌已成为一个公共卫生问题;有必要重新设计其治疗方案以实现降阶梯治疗。我们的论文阐述了开展一项3期随机试验的基本原理,以评估疗效显著且高效但负担较小的辅助治疗方案。 材料与方法:对于老年低风险乳腺癌,已对辅助治疗进行了调整,使其更合适且高效。我们回顾了基于加速或非加速方案的大分割放疗以及加速和超加速部分乳腺照射(APBI)方案。还研究了在辅助治疗方案中取消放疗(RT)或内分泌治疗(ET)的情况。基于分子和APBI分类,讨论了纳入标准。 结果:比较标准放疗方案与加速/非加速大分割放疗方案的3期随机试验证实,后者在局部控制方面并不逊色。同样,除了基于术中的技术外,对于低风险乳腺癌,APBI与全乳照射相比,局部控制率并不逊色。在使用超APBI的2期前瞻性试验中,观察到了关于肿瘤学结局和毒性特征的令人鼓舞的结果。在3期试验中,不进行放疗的辅助ET显著增加了局部复发率,且对总生存期无影响,而单独放疗则证明是有效的。在一项比较APBI + 5年ET与单独使用超加速部分乳腺照射(uAPBI,16 Gy,单次照射)的3期随机试验中,选择60岁及以上的低风险、管腔A型老年乳腺癌患者作为目标人群。 结论:为了研究老年乳腺癌患者的降阶梯辅助治疗,我们制定了一个路线图,以测试更便捷的策略。这项EPOPE 3期随机试验得到了GEC-ESTRO乳腺癌工作组的支持。
Cancers (Basel). 2025-5-23
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024-10-2
Cancers (Basel). 2023-2-16
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021-9-1
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021-3-15
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-29