Suppr超能文献

阻塞性气道疾病患者的久坐时间。

Sedentary time in people with obstructive airway diseases.

机构信息

National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Excellence in Severe Asthma, Australia; Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.

Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Kinesiology, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2021 May;181:106367. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106367. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Sedentary time (ST) and light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) are movement behaviours associated with important health outcomes, but are not widely explored in respiratory diseases. We aimed to describe their volume and/or accumulation patterns in moderate-severe COPD, bronchiectasis and severe asthma using the accurate postural-based accelerometer activPAL, contrasting these values with a non-respiratory population. We also sought to test the cross-sectional associations of these behaviours with disease characteristics by diagnostic group, and as a combined label-free disease group.

RESULTS

Adults with COPD (n = 64), bronchiectasis (n = 61), severe asthma (n = 27), and controls (n = 61) underwent cross-sectional measurements of volume and/or accumulation patterns of ST and LIPA. The prevalence and characteristics, and associations with exercise capacity, health-status, airflow-limitation, dyspnoea, systemic inflammation and exacerbations were analysed. ST volumes in COPD were higher than that of bronchiectasis and severe asthma. Values in bronchiectasis and severe asthma were similar to each other and controls (≈8.9 h/day). Their accumulation patterns were also significantly better than in COPD, but similar if not worse compared to controls. LIPA volumes in bronchiectasis and severe asthma were also higher than those of COPD (p < 0.05) and controls. In bronchiectasis and COPD, lower levels/better patterns of ST accumulation, as well as higher LIPA volume were associated with better clinical characteristics. These associations may be mediated by airflow limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The discordance between engagement in ST volume versus ST patterns highlights the importance of accounting for both these different yet complementary metrics. ST and LIPA are low-intensity activities associated with important clinical characteristics in people with chronic respiratory diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

摘要

目的:描述中重度 COPD、支气管扩张症和重度哮喘患者基于姿势的精确加速度计 activPAL 测量的久坐时间(ST)和低强度体力活动(LIPA)的量和/或积累模式,并与非呼吸系统人群进行对比。我们还试图按诊断组和无标签的混合呼吸系统疾病组,检验这些行为与疾病特征的横断面关联。

方法:64 例 COPD 患者、61 例支气管扩张症患者、27 例重度哮喘患者和 61 例对照组接受了 ST 和 LIPA 量和/或积累模式的横断面测量。分析了发病率和特征,以及与运动能力、健康状况、气流受限、呼吸困难、全身炎症和加重的相关性。COPD 的 ST 量高于支气管扩张症和重度哮喘。支气管扩张症和重度哮喘的数值彼此相似,与对照组(≈8.9h/d)相似。它们的积累模式也明显好于 COPD,但与对照组相似,如果不是更差的话。支气管扩张症和重度哮喘的 LIPA 量也高于 COPD(p<0.05)和对照组。在支气管扩张症和 COPD 中,ST 积累量较低/模式较好,以及 LIPA 量较高,与更好的临床特征相关。这些关联可能是由气流受限介导的。

结论:参与 ST 量与 ST 模式之间的差异突出了考虑这两个不同但互补的指标的重要性。ST 和 LIPA 是与慢性呼吸系统疾病患者重要临床特征相关的低强度活动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验