• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解资源有限环境下创伤登记处发展的障碍和促进因素:对创伤登记处负责人和研究人员的调查。

Understanding the barriers and facilitators to trauma registry development in resource-constrained settings: A survey of trauma registry stewards and researchers.

机构信息

Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Injury. 2021 Aug;52(8):2215-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.034
PMID:33832705
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The implementation of trauma registries has proven a highly effective means of injury control. However, many low and middle-income countries lack trauma registries. Those that have trauma registries vary widely in terms of both implementation and structure. We sought to identify the most common barriers that stand in the way of sustainable trauma registry implementation, and the types of strategies that have proven successful in overcoming these barriers.

METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire of trauma registry stewards and researchers in LMICs.

RESULTS

Twenty-two individuals responded to the questionnaire representing trauma registry experiences across thirteen LMICs. The most common barriers to trauma registry implementation identified included staffing, funding, and stakeholder engagement. Many different strategies for addressing these barriers were discussed. Those mentioned by multiple respondents included the need for a trauma registry champion, fostering strong stakeholder relationships, and improving efficiency of data collection.

CONCLUSIONS

Though trauma registry implementation and structure may differ from place to place, there are many shared barriers and facilitators that can be learned from. Identifying these common experiences can help create a repository of knowledge that can better serve those looking to implement their own trauma registries in similar settings.

摘要

背景

创伤登记处的实施已被证明是一种行之有效的伤害控制手段。然而,许多中低收入国家缺乏创伤登记处。那些已经有创伤登记处的国家,在实施和结构方面差异很大。我们试图确定阻碍创伤登记处可持续实施的最常见障碍,以及已被证明成功克服这些障碍的策略类型。

方法

我们对中低收入国家的创伤登记处负责人和研究人员进行了问卷调查。

结果

22 人回答了问卷,代表了 13 个中低收入国家的创伤登记处经验。创伤登记处实施中最常见的障碍包括人员配备、资金和利益相关者的参与。讨论了许多不同的策略来解决这些障碍。多位受访者提到的策略包括需要有一个创伤登记处的拥护者、建立强有力的利益相关者关系,以及提高数据收集效率。

结论

尽管创伤登记处的实施和结构可能因地点而异,但仍有许多共同的障碍和促进因素可以借鉴。确定这些共同的经验可以帮助建立一个知识库,为那些希望在类似环境中实施自己的创伤登记处的人提供更好的服务。

相似文献

1
Understanding the barriers and facilitators to trauma registry development in resource-constrained settings: A survey of trauma registry stewards and researchers.了解资源有限环境下创伤登记处发展的障碍和促进因素:对创伤登记处负责人和研究人员的调查。
Injury. 2021 Aug;52(8):2215-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
Trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries: challenges and opportunities.低收入和中等收入国家创伤登记系统的实施:挑战与机遇
J Surg Res. 2018 Mar;223:72-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.09.039. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
3
Current status of implementation of trauma registries' in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation.中低收入国家创伤登记处实施现状及实施障碍的促进因素:文献回顾与专家咨询。
Indian J Med Res. 2024;159(3 & 4):322-330. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_2420_23.
4
An interview of trauma registry custodians to determine lessons learnt.对创伤登记保管人员进行访谈以确定所吸取的教训。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.032. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Trauma registry implementation and operation in low and middle income countries: A scoping review.中低收入国家创伤登记处的实施和运作:范围综述。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Dec;14(12):1884-1897. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1622761. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
6
Strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries-protocol for a systematic review.在中低收入国家成功实施创伤登记处的策略:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 21;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0700-2.
7
Improved documentation following the implementation of a trauma registry: A means of sustainability for trauma registries in low- and middle-income countries.创伤登记处实施后文档质量的改善:为中低收入国家创伤登记处的可持续性提供了一种手段。
Injury. 2021 Sep;52(9):2672-2676. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.07.030. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
8
Barriers and facilitators to implementing trauma registries in low- and middle-income countries: Qualitative experiences from Tanzania.低收入和中等收入国家实施创伤登记的障碍与促进因素:来自坦桑尼亚的定性经验
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 1):S23-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
Factors contributing to successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.中低收入国家成功实施创伤登记的影响因素:一项系统综述。
Injury. 2018 Dec;49(12):2100-2110. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
Maximizing the potential of trauma registries in low-income and middle-income countries.最大化低收入和中等收入国家创伤登记处的潜力。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 May 12;5(1):e000469. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000469. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Trauma in India: current status and the path forward.印度的创伤情况:现状与未来之路
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jun 22;10(2):e001803. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001803. eCollection 2025.
2
Designing a prototype trauma registry framework for a tertiary health institution in a low- and middle-income country: A qualitative study.为低收入和中等收入国家的一家三级医疗机构设计创伤登记框架原型:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0317141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317141. eCollection 2025.
3
Barriers and facilitators to using feedback from clinical quality registries: a scoping review protocol.
使用临床质量登记处反馈的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 4;13(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02693-z.
4
Current status of implementation of trauma registries' in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation.中低收入国家创伤登记处实施现状及实施障碍的促进因素:文献回顾与专家咨询。
Indian J Med Res. 2024;159(3 & 4):322-330. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_2420_23.
5
Trauma systems in Asian countries: challenges and recommendations.亚洲国家的创伤体系:挑战与建议。
Crit Care. 2024 Feb 16;28(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04838-x.
6
Global Neurotrauma Surveillance: Are National Databases Overrated? Comment on "Neurotrauma Surveillance in National Registries of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Comparative Analysis of Data Dictionaries".全球神经创伤监测:国家数据库是否被高估了?述评“中低收入国家国家登记处的神经创伤监测:数据字典的范围综述和比较分析”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7577. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7577. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
The Role of Registries in Neurotrauma Research: Translating Data Into Health Policy That Enhances Patient Care Comment on "Neurotrauma Surveillance in National Registries of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Comparative Analysis of Data Dictionaries".登记研究在神经创伤研究中的作用:将数据转化为增强患者护理的健康政策 述评:“中低收入国家国家登记处的神经创伤监测:数据字典的范围综述和比较分析”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7521. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7521. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
8
Hip fracture registries in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.中低收入国家的髋部骨折登记处:范围综述。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Apr 17;18(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01241-x.
9
Facilitators and barriers impacting in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) implementation across country income levels: a scoping review.在不同国家收入水平下,影响创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)实施的促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e068219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068219.
10
Barriers and facilitators for disease registry systems: a mixed-method study.疾病登记系统的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Apr 11;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01840-7.