Grigoryan Zoya, Shen Michael J, Twardus Shaina W, Beuttler Marc M, Chen Lea Ann, Bateman-House Alison
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, 10E1, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Med Microecol. 2020 Dec;6. doi: 10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under "enforcement discretion" for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for "do-it-yourself" (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI-studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising-little is still known about the treatmen's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)作为一种治疗复发性和难治性感染(CDI)以及众多其他适应症的方法,在全球范围内迅速声名鹊起且广受欢迎,但其使用的证据水平各不相同。目前,美国使用FMT尚未获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的上市批准,但在“执法自由裁量权”下,对于对标准治疗无反应的CDI患者是允许使用的。与此同时,主流媒体对肠道微生物群的兴趣日益浓厚,为该程序的“自己动手做”(DIY)改编铺平了道路。这种获取途径和不受监管的使用,通常在没有任何临床监督的情况下进行,很快就超过了医学界的研究和监管努力。虽然一些研究已经能够证明FMT在治疗CDI以外的疾病方面取得了成功——关于溃疡性结肠炎的研究尤其有前景——但对于该治疗方法的作用机制或长期副作用仍知之甚少。同样,在供体粪便筛查的方案标准化方面仍处于早期阶段。在本文中,我们探讨了在平衡获取一种新兴但有前景的创新治疗方法与对其疗效、风险状况和长期影响进行研究的需求时所产生的监管和伦理问题。