• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人工智能预测颈动脉支架置入术后 30 天内非计划性再入院的因素。

Predictors of 30-Day Unplanned Readmission After Carotid Artery Stenting Using Artificial Intelligence.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, University of South Alabama, 2451 University Hospital Dr, Suite 10D, Mobile, AL, 36617, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):2954-2972. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01709-7. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-021-01709-7
PMID:33834355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8190015/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to describe the rates and causes of unplanned readmissions within 30 days following carotid artery stenting (CAS) and to use artificial intelligence machine learning analysis for creating a prediction model for short-term readmissions. The prediction of unplanned readmissions after index CAS remains challenging. There is a need to leverage deep machine learning algorithms in order to develop robust prediction tools for early readmissions.

METHODS

Patients undergoing inpatient CAS during the year 2017 in the US Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) were evaluated for the rates, predictors, and costs of unplanned 30-day readmission. Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), deep neural network (DNN), random forest, and decision tree models were evaluated to generate a robust prediction model.

RESULTS

We identified 16,745 patients who underwent CAS, of whom 7.4% were readmitted within 30 days. Depression [p < 0.001, OR 1.461 (95% CI 1.231-1.735)], heart failure [p < 0.001, OR 1.619 (95% CI 1.363-1.922)], cancer [p < 0.001, OR 1.631 (95% CI 1.286-2.068)], in-hospital bleeding [p = 0.039, OR 1.641 (95% CI 1.026-2.626)], and coagulation disorders [p = 0.007, OR 1.412 (95% CI 1.100-1.813)] were the strongest predictors of readmission. The artificial intelligence machine learning DNN prediction model has a C-statistic value of 0.79 (validation 0.73) in predicting the patients who might have all-cause unplanned readmission within 30 days of the index CAS discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning derived models may effectively identify high-risk patients for intervention strategies that may reduce unplanned readmissions post carotid artery stenting.

CENTRAL ILLUSTRATION

Figure 2: ROC and AUPRC analysis of DNN prediction model with other classification models on 30-day readmission data for CAS subjects.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在描述颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后 30 天内计划性再入院的发生率和原因,并利用人工智能机器学习分析建立短期再入院的预测模型。预测指数 CAS 后计划性再入院仍然具有挑战性。需要利用深度学习算法开发强大的预测工具,以早期预测再入院。

方法

评估 2017 年美国全国再入院数据库(NRD)中接受住院 CAS 的患者计划性 30 天再入院的发生率、预测因素和费用。评估逻辑回归、支持向量机(SVM)、深度神经网络(DNN)、随机森林和决策树模型,以生成稳健的预测模型。

结果

我们确定了 16745 例接受 CAS 的患者,其中 7.4%在 30 天内再入院。抑郁[P<0.001,OR 1.461(95%CI 1.231-1.735)]、心力衰竭[P<0.001,OR 1.619(95%CI 1.363-1.922)]、癌症[P<0.001,OR 1.631(95%CI 1.286-2.068)]、住院内出血[P=0.039,OR 1.641(95%CI 1.026-2.626)]和凝血障碍[P=0.007,OR 1.412(95%CI 1.100-1.813)]是再入院的最强预测因素。人工智能机器学习 DNN 预测模型在预测索引 CAS 出院后 30 天内可能发生全因计划性再入院的患者方面,其 C 统计量值为 0.79(验证值为 0.73)。

结论

机器学习衍生模型可有效识别高危患者,采取干预策略可减少颈动脉支架置入术后计划性再入院。

重点图示

图 2:DNN 预测模型与 CAS 患者 30 天再入院数据的其他分类模型的 ROC 和 AUPRC 分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d2/8190015/91b65116569a/12325_2021_1709_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d2/8190015/ab37add85e45/12325_2021_1709_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d2/8190015/4916aec288bd/12325_2021_1709_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d2/8190015/91b65116569a/12325_2021_1709_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d2/8190015/ab37add85e45/12325_2021_1709_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d2/8190015/4916aec288bd/12325_2021_1709_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77d2/8190015/91b65116569a/12325_2021_1709_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of 30-Day Unplanned Readmission After Carotid Artery Stenting Using Artificial Intelligence.使用人工智能预测颈动脉支架置入术后 30 天内非计划性再入院的因素。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):2954-2972. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01709-7. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
The utilization of artificial neural networks for the prediction of 90-day unplanned readmissions following total knee arthroplasty.利用人工神经网络预测全膝关节置换术后 90 天内的非计划性再入院。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3279-3289. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04566-3. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
3
Comparison of 30-day readmission rates and risk factors between carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的30天再入院率及危险因素比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1432-1444.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.097. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
Using machine learning to predict paediatric 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: a case-control retrospective analysis of medical records, including written discharge documentation.使用机器学习预测儿科 30 天内非计划性住院再入院率:病历回顾性病例对照研究,包括书面出院记录。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):328-337. doi: 10.1071/AH20062.
5
Evaluating machine learning algorithms to Predict 30-day Unplanned REadmission (PURE) in Urology patients.评估机器学习算法预测泌尿外科患者 30 天非计划性再入院(PURE)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02200-9.
6
Predictive modeling for 14-day unplanned hospital readmission risk by using machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的 14 天内非计划性住院再入院风险预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 20;21(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01639-y.
7
Thirty-Day Readmissions After Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy: Analysis of the 2013-2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database.颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术治疗后 30 天内再入院情况分析:2013-2014 年全国再入院数据库分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr;13(4):e008508. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008508. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
8
Carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic stenosis is associated with decreased 30-day readmission at very high volume centers.颈动脉支架置入术治疗无症状狭窄与高容量中心 30 天再入院率降低相关。
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Aug;114:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
9
Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict unplanned readmission following total shoulder arthroplasty.比较机器学习技术预测全肩关节置换术后非计划性再入院。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb;30(2):e50-e59. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
10
Hidden Readmissions after Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术后的隐匿性再入院情况。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.025. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-reported outcomes following lower extremity, carotid and aortic artery disease: protocol for the Danish Vascular (DanVasc) survey.下肢、颈动脉及主动脉疾病的自我报告结局:丹麦血管(DanVasc)调查方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e092479. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092479.
2
Prediction of 30-day mortality for ICU patients with Sepsis-3.Sepsis-3 所致 ICU 患者 30 天死亡率预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02629-6.
3
Readmission Rates in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Hidden Readmissions after Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术后的隐匿性再入院情况。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.025. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
Thirty-Day Readmissions After Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy: Analysis of the 2013-2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database.颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术治疗后 30 天内再入院情况分析:2013-2014 年全国再入院数据库分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr;13(4):e008508. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008508. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
3
Thirty-day readmission after endovascular or surgical revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.
多发性硬化症患者的再入院率:一项全国性队列研究。
Int J MS Care. 2022 Sep-Oct;24(5):218-223. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-089. Epub 2022 May 3.
4
Predicting 30-Day Readmission for Stroke Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Prospective Cohort Study.使用机器学习算法预测中风患者30天再入院率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 4;13:875491. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.875491. eCollection 2022.
5
Predictive modeling for COVID-19 readmission risk using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法对 COVID-19 再入院风险进行预测建模。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 20;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01880-z.
6
Prediction of unplanned 30-day readmission for ICU patients with heart failure.预测 ICU 心力衰竭患者的 30 天非计划性再入院。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 2;22(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01857-y.
7
Characteristics and Outcomes of Clinical Trials on Gene Therapy in Noncongenital Cardiovascular Diseases: Cross-sectional Study of Three Clinical Trial Registries.非先天性心血管疾病基因治疗临床试验的特征与结果:三项临床试验注册库的横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 21;6(4):e33893. doi: 10.2196/33893.
8
ResNet-BiLSTM: A Multiscale Deep Learning Model for Heartbeat Detection Using Ballistocardiogram Signals.ResNet-BiLSTM:基于心冲击图信号的多尺度深度学习心跳检测模型。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 27;2022:6388445. doi: 10.1155/2022/6388445. eCollection 2022.
9
Age- and Diagnosis-Based Trends for Unplanned Pediatric Rehospitalizations in the United States.美国基于年龄和诊断的儿童非计划性再住院趋势
Cureus. 2021 Dec 5;13(12):e20181. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20181. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Risk Factors, Trends, and Preventive Measures for 30-Day Unplanned Diabetic Ketoacidosis Readmissions in the Pediatric Population.儿科人群30天内非计划性糖尿病酮症酸中毒再入院的危险因素、趋势及预防措施
Cureus. 2021 Nov 2;13(11):e19205. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19205. eCollection 2021 Nov.
慢性肠系膜缺血血管内或手术再血管化治疗后 30 天内再入院:来自全国再入院数据库的见解。
Vasc Med. 2019 Jun;24(3):216-223. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18816816. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
Thirty-day Readmission Rates for Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术的 30 天再入院率。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:270-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
5
Frequency of 30-Day Readmission and Its Causes After Endovascular Aneurysm Intervention of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (from the Nationwide Readmission Database).腹主动脉瘤血管内介入治疗后 30 天内再入院率及其原因(来自全国再入院数据库)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 15;123(6):986-994. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
6
Prediction Models for Clinical Outcome After a Carotid Revascularization Procedure.颈动脉血运重建术后临床结局预测模型。
Stroke. 2018 Aug;49(8):1880-1885. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020486.
7
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.深度学习在医学图像分析中的应用研究综述。
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
8
Thirty-Day Readmissions After Endovascular or Surgical Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: Analysis of the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Databases.血管内或手术治疗严重肢体缺血后 30 天再入院:2013 年至 2014 年全国再入院数据库分析。
Circulation. 2017 Jul 11;136(2):167-176. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027625. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
Deep Learning for Health Informatics.用于健康信息学的深度学习
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan;21(1):4-21. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2636665. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
10
Readmission rates after lower extremity bypass vary significantly by surgical indication.下肢搭桥术后的再入院率因手术指征不同而有显著差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;64(2):458-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.422. Epub 2016 Apr 29.