Migliore Gian Luca, Petrone Nicola, Hobara Hiroaki, Nagahara Ryu, Miyashiro Kenji, Costa Gian Fabio, Gri Antonio, Cutti Andrea G
Applied Research, INAIL Prosthetic Center, Vigorso di Budrio, Italy.
Department of Industrial Engineering, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021 Feb;45(1):46-53. doi: 10.1177/0309364620946910.
Recommendations for the alignment of the socket and foot in the sprinting prosthesis of athletes with transfemoral amputation are either based on walking biomechanics or lack public scientific evidence.
To explore the biomechanical changes and the sensations of a gold medal Paralympic sprinter, while running with three bench alignments: a conventional reference (A0), an innovative alignment based on the biomechanics of elite able-bodied sprinters (A2), and an intermediate alignment (A1).
Single subject with repeated measures.
A1 and A2 feature a progressively greater socket tilt and a plantar-flexed foot compared to A0. The 30-year-old female athlete trained with three prostheses, one per alignment, for at least 2 months. We administered a questionnaire to collect her impressions. Then, she ran on a treadmill at full speed (5.5 m/s). We measured the kinematics and moments of the prosthetic side, and the ground reaction forces of both sides.
A2 reduced the prosthetic side hip extension at foot-off while preserving hip range of motion, decreased the impulse of the hip moment, and increased the horizontal propulsion, leaving sufficient margin to prevent knee buckling without increasing sound side braking forces. Biomechanical outcomes matched well with subjective impressions.
A2 appears promising to improve the performance and comfort of sprinters with transfemoral amputation, without compromising safety.
Observation of elite able-bodied sprinters led to the definition of a new specific alignment for the sprinting prosthesis of athletes with transfemoral amputation, which appears promising to improve performance and comfort, without compromising safety. This may constitute a major improvement compared to alignments based on walking biomechanics.
对于经股骨截肢运动员短跑假肢中接受腔与足部对线的建议,要么基于行走生物力学,要么缺乏公开的科学证据。
探讨一名残奥会金牌短跑运动员在使用三种接受腔对线方式跑步时的生物力学变化和感受,这三种对线方式分别为:传统参考对线(A0)、基于优秀健全短跑运动员生物力学的创新对线(A2)和中间对线(A1)。
单受试者重复测量。
与A0相比,A1和A2的接受腔倾斜度逐渐增大,足部为跖屈位。这位30岁的女性运动员使用三种假肢进行训练,每种对线方式的假肢使用至少2个月。我们发放问卷以收集她的感受。然后,她在跑步机上全速奔跑(5.5米/秒)。我们测量了假肢侧的运动学和力矩,以及两侧的地面反作用力。
A2在离地时减少了假肢侧髋关节伸展,同时保留了髋关节活动范围,减少了髋部力矩的冲量,并增加了水平推进力,留出了足够的余量以防止膝盖屈曲,同时不增加健侧制动力。生物力学结果与主观感受非常吻合。
A2似乎有望改善经股骨截肢短跑运动员的表现和舒适度,且不影响安全性。
对优秀健全短跑运动员的观察促使我们为经股骨截肢运动员的短跑假肢定义了一种新的特定对线方式,这种对线方式似乎有望改善表现和舒适度,且不影响安全性。与基于行走生物力学的对线方式相比,这可能是一项重大改进。