Suppr超能文献

小腿假肢接受腔的机械测试:美国矫形器和假肢协会接受腔指导工作组的讨论文件。

Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, Padua (PD), Italy.

INAIL Prosthetic Center, Vigorso di Budrio (BO), Italy.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Feb 1;47(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000222. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advent of novel manufacturing technologies, materials, and socket design concepts could introduce risks to prosthetic limb users, as the existing knowledge base for safe fabrication may not apply. Moreover, although structural test standards exist for mass-produced prosthetic components, they are not applicable to prosthetic sockets.

METHODS

The "AOPA Socket Guidance Workgroup" was formed in 2020 to provide the prosthetic community with evidence-based clinical best practices and methods in the field of prosthetic socket structural analysis. This multidisciplinary expert workgroup undertook a critical analysis of the knowledge gaps regarding the requirements for mechanical testing of lower limb prosthetic sockets.

RESULTS

The Workgroup identified knowledge gaps in 4 domains. Domain 1 describes the shape and composition of a mock residual limb, required to support and generate in vivo representative loading within the socket. Domain 2 concerns prosthetic socket coordinate systems and alignment. Domain 3 regards the components and requirements of test specimens. Finally, Domain 4 considers test conditions, loading parameters, and acceptance criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper describes these knowledge gaps in detail and recommends potential solution approaches based on literature review, group consensus around existing knowledge, or the formation of new study groups to fill each knowledge gap. Our intent is for the recommendations arising from this paper to support the community (e.g., researchers in the clinic, academia, industry, and funders) in addressing these knowledge gaps.

摘要

背景

新型制造技术、材料和插座设计理念的出现可能会给假肢使用者带来风险,因为现有的安全制造知识库可能并不适用。此外,尽管存在大量生产的假肢部件的结构测试标准,但它们不适用于假肢插座。

方法

2020 年成立了“AOPA 插座指导工作组”,为假肢社区提供假肢插座结构分析领域的循证临床最佳实践和方法。这个多学科专家工作组对下肢假肢插座机械测试要求的知识空白进行了批判性分析。

结果

工作组在 4 个领域确定了知识空白。第 1 个领域描述了模拟残肢的形状和组成,这是在插座内支撑和产生体内代表性负载所必需的。第 2 个领域涉及假肢插座坐标系和对准。第 3 个领域涉及测试标本的组成部分和要求。最后,第 4 个领域考虑了测试条件、加载参数和验收标准。

结论

本文详细描述了这些知识空白,并根据文献综述、围绕现有知识的小组共识,或形成新的研究小组来填补每个知识空白,推荐了潜在的解决方案方法。我们的目的是希望本文提出的建议能够支持社区(例如,临床、学术界、行业和资助者中的研究人员)解决这些知识空白。

相似文献

6
Structural testing of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: A systematic review.下肢假肢接受腔的结构测试:系统评价。
Med Eng Phys. 2022 Jan;99:103742. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.103742. Epub 2021 Dec 12.
10
Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets.全股骨假肢接受腔界面压力的定量分析。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Apr 1;48(2):176-183. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000251. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
3D Printed Prostheses: The Path from Hype to Reality.3D打印假肢:从炒作走向现实之路。
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2023 Dec 22;6(2):42141. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v6i2.42141. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

3
Structural testing of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: A systematic review.下肢假肢接受腔的结构测试:系统评价。
Med Eng Phys. 2022 Jan;99:103742. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.103742. Epub 2021 Dec 12.
9
Prosthetic limb sockets from plant-based composite materials.基于植物的复合材料制成的假肢接受腔。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012 Jun;36(2):181-9. doi: 10.1177/0309364611434568. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验