Suppr超能文献

《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版边缘型人格障碍的替代模型概念化:证据回顾。

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, alternative model conceptualization of borderline personality disorder: A review of the evidence.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):402-406. doi: 10.1037/per0000563.

Abstract

In the 10 years following the publishing of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), studies have accumulated testing the validity and utility of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the context of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this article, we review the studies that have tested how well the AMPD conceptualization of BPD captures the traditional (DSM-5, Section II) conceptualization of BPD. Although we note that studies that measure the full conceptualization of the AMPD-BPD are limited compared with studies focusing on a single aspect of the AMPD, studies reviewed suggest that the AMPD conceptualization of BPD largely overlaps with Section II, is associated with a similar range of external constructs, and can be measured with similar levels of interrater reliability. This evidence is promising in terms of the goal of the AMPD developers to not lose relevant and clinically meaningful information associated with traditional conceptualizations of BPD. However, further applied research is needed to understand how the AMPD may improve upon our existing categorical conceptualization of BPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

在《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)出版后的 10 年中,已经积累了大量研究来测试人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)在边缘型人格障碍(BPD)背景下的有效性和实用性。在本文中,我们回顾了那些测试 AMPD 对 BPD 的概念化如何捕捉传统(DSM-5,第二部分)对 BPD 的概念化的研究。尽管我们注意到,与专注于 AMPD 单一方面的研究相比,衡量 AMPD-BPD 完整概念化的研究有限,但综述的研究表明,BPD 的 AMPD 概念化在很大程度上与第二部分重叠,与类似范围的外部结构相关,并且可以用类似的评分者间信度进行测量。就 AMPD 开发人员的目标而言,这一证据是有希望的,即不失去与 BPD 的传统概念化相关的相关和具有临床意义的信息。然而,需要进一步的应用研究来了解 AMPD 如何改进我们现有的 BPD 分类概念化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

5
Reconceptualization of borderline conditions through the lens of the alternative model of personality disorders.
Personal Disord. 2022 May;13(3):266-276. doi: 10.1037/per0000502. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Big Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological trait scales.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;122(4):749-777. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000395. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Assessing Criterion A in adolescents using the Semistructured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5.
Personal Disord. 2021 Jul;12(4):312-319. doi: 10.1037/per0000454. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
A systematic review of the clinical utility of the DSM-5 section III alternative model of personality disorder.
Personal Disord. 2020 Nov;11(6):377-397. doi: 10.1037/per0000408. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Elucidating the relationship between borderline personality disorder and intimate partner violence.
Personal Ment Health. 2020 Aug;14(3):284-303. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1480. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
The DSM-5 section III personality disorder criterion a in relation to both pathological and general personality traits.
Personal Disord. 2020 May;11(3):202-212. doi: 10.1037/per0000383. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
8
A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 section III personality disorder models.
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):72-84. doi: 10.1037/pas0000772. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
9
Interdiagnostician Reliability of the Section II and Section III Alternative Model Criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder.
J Pers Disord. 2019 Dec;33(6):721-S18. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_362. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验