• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版边缘型人格障碍的替代模型概念化:证据回顾。

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, alternative model conceptualization of borderline personality disorder: A review of the evidence.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):402-406. doi: 10.1037/per0000563.

DOI:10.1037/per0000563
PMID:35787130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9558039/
Abstract

In the 10 years following the publishing of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), studies have accumulated testing the validity and utility of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the context of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this article, we review the studies that have tested how well the AMPD conceptualization of BPD captures the traditional (DSM-5, Section II) conceptualization of BPD. Although we note that studies that measure the full conceptualization of the AMPD-BPD are limited compared with studies focusing on a single aspect of the AMPD, studies reviewed suggest that the AMPD conceptualization of BPD largely overlaps with Section II, is associated with a similar range of external constructs, and can be measured with similar levels of interrater reliability. This evidence is promising in terms of the goal of the AMPD developers to not lose relevant and clinically meaningful information associated with traditional conceptualizations of BPD. However, further applied research is needed to understand how the AMPD may improve upon our existing categorical conceptualization of BPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

在《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)出版后的 10 年中,已经积累了大量研究来测试人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)在边缘型人格障碍(BPD)背景下的有效性和实用性。在本文中,我们回顾了那些测试 AMPD 对 BPD 的概念化如何捕捉传统(DSM-5,第二部分)对 BPD 的概念化的研究。尽管我们注意到,与专注于 AMPD 单一方面的研究相比,衡量 AMPD-BPD 完整概念化的研究有限,但综述的研究表明,BPD 的 AMPD 概念化在很大程度上与第二部分重叠,与类似范围的外部结构相关,并且可以用类似的评分者间信度进行测量。就 AMPD 开发人员的目标而言,这一证据是有希望的,即不失去与 BPD 的传统概念化相关的相关和具有临床意义的信息。然而,需要进一步的应用研究来了解 AMPD 如何改进我们现有的 BPD 分类概念化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, alternative model conceptualization of borderline personality disorder: A review of the evidence.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版边缘型人格障碍的替代模型概念化:证据回顾。
Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):402-406. doi: 10.1037/per0000563.
2
Different routes to the same destination? Comparing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition Section II- and alternative model of personality disorder-defined borderline personality disorder.殊途同归?比较《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版第二编与替代性人格障碍定义的边缘型人格障碍。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):352-360. doi: 10.1037/per0000676. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
[Validation of a screening procedure for borderline personality disorder based on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders].[基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍替代模型的边缘型人格障碍筛查程序验证]
Sante Ment Que. 2022 Fall;47(2):17-39.
4
Interrater reliability of criterion A of the alternative model for personality disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition-Section III): A meta-analysis.人格障碍替代模型标准 A 的评定者间信度(《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)-第三部分》):一项荟萃分析。
Personal Disord. 2023 Nov;14(6):613-624. doi: 10.1037/per0000631. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Reconceptualization of borderline conditions through the lens of the alternative model of personality disorders.通过人格障碍替代模型视角对边缘性状况的重新概念化。
Personal Disord. 2022 May;13(3):266-276. doi: 10.1037/per0000502. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition alternative model of personality disorder.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍替代模型。
Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):347-355. doi: 10.1037/per0000524.
7
Reliability, structure, and validity of module I (personality functioning) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders (SCID-5-AMPD-I).DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型结构临床访谈模块 I(人格功能)的可靠性、结构和有效性(SCID-5-AMPD-I)。
Personal Disord. 2023 May;14(3):287-299. doi: 10.1037/per0000576. Epub 2022 May 5.
8
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, personality disorders and the alternative model: Prediction of naturalistically observed behavior, interpersonal functioning, and psychiatric symptoms, 1 year later.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版、人格障碍与替代模型:对一年后自然观察到的行为、人际功能和精神症状的预测
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):361-370. doi: 10.1037/per0000677. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
Comparing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, personality disorder models scored from the same interview.比较《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版,从相同的访谈中对人格障碍模型进行评分。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):371-378. doi: 10.1037/per0000663. Epub 2024 May 9.
10
Criterion A: Level of personality functioning in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.标准 A:人格障碍的替代 DSM-5 模型中的人格功能水平。
Personal Disord. 2022 Jul;13(4):305-315. doi: 10.1037/per0000551.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) according to DSM-5 revision criteria.根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订标准,人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的有效性、可靠性和临床实用性。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):319-340. doi: 10.1002/wps.21339.
2
Antagonistic Narcissism in Women with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Case-Control Study.边缘性人格障碍女性中的对抗性自恋:一项病例对照研究。
Psychopathology. 2025 Apr 21:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000545761.
3
Compare the effectiveness of two treatments, behavioral activation and acceptance and commitment therapy, on depression and mental rumination in mothers of children with cerebral palsy in Ilam city.比较行为激活疗法和接纳与承诺疗法这两种治疗方法对伊拉姆市脑瘫患儿母亲的抑郁和心理反刍的疗效。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 29;13:260. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1720_23. eCollection 2024.
4
Quality of Life Assessment Using the WHOQOL-BREF Survey in Hospitalized Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder from Romania.罗马尼亚酒精使用障碍住院患者中使用世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)进行生活质量评估
Diseases. 2024 Jul 16;12(7):158. doi: 10.3390/diseases12070158.
5
Borderline personality disorder features and their relationship with trauma and dissociation in a sample of community health service users.社区卫生服务使用者样本中的边缘型人格障碍特征及其与创伤和解离的关系。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Jul 3;10(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40479-023-00228-x.
6
Maladaptive Self- and Interpersonal Functioning Increments General Psychiatric Severity in the Association with Adolescent Personality Pathology.适应不良的自我及人际功能会增加青少年人格病理学相关的一般精神疾病严重程度。
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;10(1):120. doi: 10.3390/children10010120.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Big Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological trait scales.评估大五人格作为常用心理特质量表的组织框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;122(4):749-777. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000395. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
The Inter-Rater Reliability and Validity of the Italian Translation of the Structured Clinical Interview for Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Module I and Module II: A Preliminary Report on Consecutively Admitted Psychotherapy Outpatients.人格障碍替代模型定式临床访谈意大利语翻译本Ⅰ和Ⅱ的评定者间信度和效度:连续入组的心理治疗门诊患者的初步报告
J Pers Disord. 2020 Dec;34(Suppl C):95-123. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2020_34_511.
3
Assessing Criterion A in adolescents using the Semistructured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5.使用 DSM-5 人格功能半结构式访谈评估青少年的标准 A。
Personal Disord. 2021 Jul;12(4):312-319. doi: 10.1037/per0000454. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
A systematic review of the clinical utility of the DSM-5 section III alternative model of personality disorder.DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍替代模型的临床实用性的系统评价。
Personal Disord. 2020 Nov;11(6):377-397. doi: 10.1037/per0000408. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Elucidating the relationship between borderline personality disorder and intimate partner violence.阐明边缘型人格障碍与亲密伴侣暴力之间的关系。
Personal Ment Health. 2020 Aug;14(3):284-303. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1480. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
The DSM-5 section III personality disorder criterion a in relation to both pathological and general personality traits.DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍标准 A 与病理性和一般性人格特质有关。
Personal Disord. 2020 May;11(3):202-212. doi: 10.1037/per0000383. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
An evaluation of DSM-5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology.DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍标准 A(损害)在解释精神病理学方面的评估。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Oct;31(10):1181-1191. doi: 10.1037/pas0000620.
8
A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 section III personality disorder models.ICD-11 与 DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍模型的全面比较。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):72-84. doi: 10.1037/pas0000772. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
9
Interdiagnostician Reliability of the Section II and Section III Alternative Model Criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder.二、三部分替代诊断标准用于边缘型人格障碍的诊断者间信度。
J Pers Disord. 2019 Dec;33(6):721-S18. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_362. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
10
Meta-analysis to derive an empirically based set of personality facet criteria for the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.元分析得出一套基于经验的人格特质标准,用于替代 DSM-5 人格障碍模型。
Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):97-104. doi: 10.1037/per0000307. Epub 2018 Dec 6.