Wu Yudan, Liang Meilan, Wu Meijing, Fu Qionge, Zeng Cimei
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Haikou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya Medical College of Central South University, Haikou 570208, Hainan, China. Corresponding author: Wu Yudan, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):334-337. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201019-00678.
To observe the application effect of respiratory stepwise management in patients with septic shock combined with acute lung injury (ALI).
100 patients with septic shock combined with ALI were selected as the research objects in Haikou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya Medical College of Central South University from January 2018 to June 2020. Fifty patients were given endotracheal intubation or invasive ventilation on the basis of conventional treatment (conventional treatment group). According to the respiratory situation and blood gas, 50 patients were given systematic respiratory support step-by-step treatment according to the principle of simple to complex, and appropriate and scientific respiratory support was given according to the sequence from unarmed to mechanical (respiratory stepwise management group). The differences of cardiac index (CI), central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO), oxygenation index (PaO/FiO) before and after treatment were compared between the two groups, the therapeutic effects of the two groups were evaluated, and the resuscitation effect, postoperative complications rate, tracheotomy rate, utilization rate of invasive ventilator of the two groups were recorded.
After treatment, CI, CVP, EVLWI, PaO, PaO/FiO levels of the two groups were significantly higher than before treatment, MAP and PaCO levels were significantly lower than before treatment; MAP and PaCO levels after treatment of the respiratory stepwise management group were significantly lower than those of the conventional treatment group [MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 68.2±7.0 vs. 74.4±6.8, PaCO (mmHg): 37.82±4.05 vs. 41.76±4.59], the levels of EVLWI, PaO and PaO/FiO in the respiratory stepwise management group were significantly higher than those in the conventional treatment group [EVLWI (mL/kg): 15.34±3.03 vs. 13.64±3.32, PaO (mmHg): 84.44±4.83 vs. 79.03±5.54, PaO/FiO (mmHg): 452.42±51.32 vs. 431.73±50.03, all P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in CI or CVP after treatment between respiratory stepwise management group and conventional treatment group [CI (mL×s×m): 70.01±21.67 vs. 66.68±18.34, CVP (mmHg): 11.1±3.2 vs. 12.3±3.2, both P > 0.05]. Compared with the conventional treatment group, the average recovery time of the respiratory stepwise management group was earlier (hours: 2.04±0.54 vs. 4.29±0.20, P < 0.05), the stable breathing time was shorter (hours: 3.07±0.22 vs. 5.36±0.35, P < 0.05), the total effective rate and the success rate of recovery were significantly improved [86.0% (43/50) vs. 60.0% (30/50), 94.0% (47/50) vs. 74.0% (37/50), both P < 0.05], the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and airway complications were significantly reduced [14.0% (7/50) vs. 32.0% (16/50), 12.0% (6/50) vs. 40.0% (20/50), both P < 0.05], and the tracheotomy rate and the utilization rate of invasive ventilator were significantly reduced [8.0% (4/50) vs. 28.0% (14/50), 30.0% (15/50) vs. 60.0% (30/50), both P < 0.05].
Respiratory stepwise management can effectively improve the resuscitation effect of septic shock patients with ALI, improve cardiopulmonary function, blood gas index and the treatment efficiency, effectively reduce the incidence of iatrogenic trauma and complications.
观察呼吸阶梯式管理在脓毒性休克合并急性肺损伤(ALI)患者中的应用效果。
选取2018年1月至2020年6月在中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院就诊的100例脓毒性休克合并ALI患者作为研究对象。50例患者在常规治疗基础上给予气管插管或有创通气(常规治疗组)。另外50例患者根据呼吸情况和血气分析,按照由简单到复杂的原则给予系统性呼吸支持逐步治疗,并根据从徒手到机械通气的顺序给予适当且科学的呼吸支持(呼吸阶梯式管理组)。比较两组治疗前后心脏指数(CI)、中心静脉压(CVP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)、动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)、氧合指数(PaO₂/FiO₂)的差异,评估两组的治疗效果,记录两组的复苏效果、术后并发症发生率、气管切开率、有创呼吸机使用率。
治疗后,两组的CI、CVP、EVLWI、PaO₂、PaO₂/FiO₂水平均显著高于治疗前,MAP和PaCO₂水平显著低于治疗前;呼吸阶梯式管理组治疗后的MAP和PaCO₂水平显著低于常规治疗组[MAP(mmHg,1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):68.2±7.0 vs. 74.4±6.8,PaCO₂(mmHg):37.82±4.05 vs. 41.76±4.59],呼吸阶梯式管理组的EVLWI、PaO₂和PaO₂/FiO₂水平显著高于常规治疗组[EVLWI(mL/kg):15.34±3.03 vs. 13.64±3.32,PaO₂(mmHg):84.44±4.83 vs. 79.03±5.54,PaO₂/FiO₂(mmHg):452.42±51.32 vs. 431.73±50.03,均P < 0.05]。呼吸阶梯式管理组与常规治疗组治疗后的CI或CVP差异无统计学意义[CI(mL×s×m):70.01±21.67 vs. 66.68±18.34,CVP(mmHg):11.1±3.2 vs. 12.3±3.2,均P > 0.05]。与常规治疗组相比,呼吸阶梯式管理组的平均恢复时间更早(小时:2.04±0.54 vs. 4.29±0.20, P < 0.05),呼吸稳定时间更短(小时:3.07±0.22 vs. 5.36±0.35, P < 0.05),总有效率和复苏成功率显著提高[86.0%(43/50)vs. 60.0%(30/五十),94.0%(47/50)vs. 74.0%(37/50),均P < 0.05],呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)和气道并发症的发生率显著降低[14.0%(7/50)vs. 32.0%(16/50),1十二点0%(6/50)vs. 40.0%(20/50),均P < 0(05)],气管切开率和有创呼吸机使用率显著降低[8.0%(4/50)vs. 28.0%(14/50),30.0%(十五/50)vs. 60.0%(30/五十),均P < 0.05]。
呼吸阶梯式管理可有效提高脓毒性休克合并ALI患者的复苏效果,改善心肺功能、血气指标及治疗效率,有效降低医源性创伤和并发症的发生率。