Ahlstrom Linda, Holmberg Christopher
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Section of Learning and Leadership for Health Care Professionals, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens Backe, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
BMC Nurs. 2021 Apr 9;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00575-6.
Despite the advantages of using active learning strategies in nursing education, researchers have rarely investigated how such pedagogic approaches can be used to assess students or how interactive examinations can be modified depending on circumstances of practice (e.g., in online education).
The aim was to compare three interactive examination designs, all based on active learning pedagogy, in terms of nursing students' engagement and preparedness, their learning achievement, and instructional aspects.
A comparative research design was used including final-year undergraduate nursing students. All students were enrolled in a quality improvement course at a metropolitan university in Sweden. In this comparative study to evaluate three course layouts, participants (Cohort 1, n = 89; Cohort 2, n = 97; Cohort 3, n = 60) completed different examinations assessing the same course content and learning objectives, after which they evaluated the examinations on a questionnaire in numerical and free-text responses. Chi-squared tests were conducted to compare background variables between the cohorts and Kruskal-Wallis H tests to assess numerical differences in experiences between cohorts. Following the guidelines of the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS), a sequential mixed-methods analysis was performed on the quantitative findings, and the qualitative findings were used complementary to support the interpretation of the quantitative results.
The 246 students who completed the questionnaire generally appreciated the interactive examination in active learning classrooms. Among significant differences in the results, Cohort 2 (e.g., conducted the examination on campus) scored highest for overall positive experience and engagement, whereas Cohort 3 (e.g., conducted the examination online) scored the lowest. Students in Cohort 3 generally commended the online examination's chat function available for use during the examination.
Interactive examinations for nursing students succeed when they are campus-based, focus on student preparation, and provide the necessary time to be completed.
尽管在护理教育中使用主动学习策略有诸多优势,但研究人员很少探讨如何利用这种教学方法来评估学生,或者如何根据实践情况(如在线教育)修改交互式考试。
旨在比较三种均基于主动学习教学法的交互式考试设计在护理专业学生的参与度、准备情况、学习成绩和教学方面的差异。
采用比较研究设计,纳入本科护理专业最后一年的学生。所有学生均参加了瑞典一所大都市大学的质量改进课程。在这项评估三种课程布局的比较研究中,参与者(第1组,n = 89;第2组,n = 97;第3组,n = 60)完成了评估相同课程内容和学习目标的不同考试,之后他们通过数字和自由文本回答的问卷对考试进行评价。进行卡方检验以比较各组之间的背景变量,并进行Kruskal-Wallis H检验以评估各组之间经验的数值差异。按照混合方法研究良好报告指南(GRAMMS),对定量结果进行顺序混合方法分析,并使用定性结果作为补充来支持对定量结果的解释。
完成问卷的246名学生总体上对主动学习课堂中的交互式考试表示赞赏。在结果的显著差异中,第2组(如在校园内进行考试)在总体积极体验和参与度方面得分最高,而第3组(如在线进行考试)得分最低。第3组的学生普遍称赞在线考试期间可用的聊天功能。
面向护理专业学生的交互式考试在基于校园、注重学生准备并提供必要的完成时间时会取得成功。